AVOID
THE
DANDELION
SEED
SYNDROME

STAG'S  LEAP

It is as if from a sleep so 
deep
Awakens a spirit ready to make
the leap
Viewing a forest green and cool
to stay in this desert is to 
act the fool.
There is nothing here, nothing
but rocks and clay
Nothing to make me sing.
Only to make me to cry
and pray
But listen to the yonder forest
Hear, as the ferns glisten
you have only to know and see
and feel and touch
Believe in the Mind!
One cannot believe too much
Think not of the rocks below
As you contemplate the leap
While wakening from that repose 
So deep.
See yourself on the other side
Yes, even with a little help
From your guide
When you believe and choose - 
Awake from your snooze!
Leap my friend, yes the 
Mind will bend -
Spirit and body will
Go to the forest on 
The other side
Where contentment
And knowing seem
To reside.

								My friend	
								Phil Powers
								1981

FORWARD

The souls choosing to reincarnate are many.  However, as mortals we are born without the conscious knowledge of that motive.  Our life's purpose is to discover the reasons for our choice to exist and fulfill the mission.  There seems to be one problem - the preconceived ideas of civilization.  They tend to minimize justifying or devoting any time or interest to this inherent goal.  Too many important pursuits are foisted upon us such as career, productivity, and money which are further emasculated by morals, scruples, religions, and the like.

Victor, our "teaching/spirit guide" for over fifteen years, has communicated his approach, via automatic writing, to live sanely in this insane world by employing the pragmatic approach of choice, belief, creativity, logic, and reason as our daily thought process.  He says that our "obstacles" are not insurmountable but are denials chosen by man as an indication of his lack of grace to accept that which is available to him.

For the seeking mind, Victor's teachings and anecdotes assist the reader to be objective to all that is, eliminate detrimental emotions, become less manipulated, understand his scheme in eternity, gain patience, attain self worth, and recognize his choice rather than presume the existence of cruel fate.  The result of this will be to gain some peace of mind.  The tact, empathy, and love of Victor should become quickly apparent, hence entice any reader to practice the teaching and perhaps pursue his own guide as outlined in the afterword.

Avoid the Dandelion Seed Syndrome  is formatted by an introduction of Pauline and me that subtly leads into the initial communication with Victor.  This is followed by the main context: lessons to be applied to daily life interspersed with sundry questions and quick poignant answers, some humorous, some sullen - on a variety of subjects.

          CONTENTS
		
	Introduction................................................................	6
	Our First Contact........................................................	14
	Our Second Contact...................................................	17
	Our Third Contact......................................................	18
	Our Forth Contact......................................................	19
	Our Introduction to Automatic Writing........................	22
	Reincarnation?...........................................................	34
	Souls.........................................................................	39
	Choices.....................................................................	48
	Contact with Souls.....................................................	51
	Present, Past and Future.............................................	58
	What is a Guide?........................................................	59	Lessons of Choice.....................................................	65
	Gurus........................................................................	71	Mortals Lessons........................................................	79
	Immortality................................................................	88
          Preconceived Ideas....................................................	94
	Earth..........................................................................	96	Sensual Stimuli...........................................................	100
	Choice.......................................................................	105
	Death.........................................................................	118
	The Brain....................................................................	134
	Cloning and Cryogenics...............................................	138
	The Choices of Children..............................................	140
	Special Events.............................................................	143
	Looking Within............................................................	149
	The Offended..............................................................	155
	Crime..........................................................................	161
	Limitations...................................................................	166	Manifesting Choices.....................................................	170
	Materialism...................................................................	179
	Choice, Belief, Creativity, Logic and Reason..................	183
	Patience........................................................................	210
	Doubts and Worry........................................................	213
	Independence................................................................	221
	Exercising the Lessons..................................................	225

                             INTRODUCTION     xxx 

						

I'm one of those guys who have stumbled through life without the the joy
I believe I could have had, but I have to admit that age, by itself, has provided me many unexpected comforts.  The most obvious is knowing I
don't have to do what's expected of me anymore or care how I'm judged.  There's also mounting insight, realized by age, that without some deliberate effort I'll depart this existence without having made much of a lasting contribution to anything except work. This book, therefore, is a purposeful act, designed  by me, to do something to effect joy for myself and provide a memoir of my having existed.  I haven't considered money as a motive for the amount of time, effort and miserable lessons I contributed to create this book.  I'm sure I've already set the record of having made more money than this book will ever generate from more mundane and less satisfying pursuits.  If, however, what I've written assists you who may sense that life could be fun and exciting but so far haven't discovered how to find or live it, then I've doubled my pleasure...so says Wrigley!  If you've dismissed suggestions to improve your life because they failed to impress your interest or beliefs - who knows - perhaps the thoughts in this book may help you create that life you do want.
Before getting too inspired about the possibilities that this book may solve all your "problems" let me forewarn you about something.  This information is not intended for those of you who would prefer a quick injection approach or results without effort for that euphoric life you might hope to attain.  Because it isn't, however, does not make it any less beneficial.  Quite the contrary, the results could be a life with perhaps more rewards and enjoyment than you may have bargained for.
Your present life style may be similar to a TV variety show without the dubbed-in laughter.  For a better understanding of what I mean, view one with a conscious awareness of the dubbed-in laughter to understand how funny it isn't.  I am suggesting that the environment in which you live may be having a similar effect as it controls or conditions your reality quite differently from how you may have viewed it without the influence.  These false impressions and the way we are conditioned to think, believe, and thus behave, is what this book is all about.  Perhaps you are already coming to some conclusions that if this is all the book is about you're not interested, because what you need is what you have again been conditioned to believe is important: big bucks, flashy cars, big houses, a job with status, and to get it quickly.  I empathize with you for it was my belief for so many years that nothing could suffice for the "comforts" accounted for by such "stuff."  Fortunately, there is more and it is this that may be more inspiring, thrilling and enjoyable than all the possessions that you could ever acquire.  Nor do I infer that "things" aren't important...because they are.  Who wouldn't prefer the softness of supple Mercedes leather to that of sun split vinyl in a bucket of bolts?  You may discover you are being deprived of more than the leather seats and that your fulfillment doesn't totally depend on things.  Life isn't the things you own, it's what you are - and what you are - is what you do.  Think about this.  Couldn't your life improve drastically if what you did, was more energizing, more inspiring, more natural to your interest?  Sure it would.  Not much else will change it.  I respect the leap some of you would like to make in this direction of your life and don't want to slow you down from proceeding by interjecting my autobiography.  However, from personal experience I realize we may tend to question these self-declared gurus proclaiming their suggestions for life's improvement and wonder, "Who is this guy to believe, or, does he have some special capability, education or creativity that only provides me just another excuse to fail?"  It is for this reason that I want to tell you about myself.  I am quite like you, as you will see, and I should not further justify your excuses to fail or succeed by being so much more capable.  I'm not!  You and I begin from the same gate and exist within the same rat race.  We may have experienced the same emptiness of a broken heart, the uncontrollable emotions of sorrow or joy, the loss of purpose to life or how or where to start anew.  I feel my ability, if you must label me, is my curiosity and objectivity of questions posed to myself, coupled with an unexplainable desire to relay the enlightenment derived from the answers to others for the sheer joy of watching their light turn on.  In other words, pulling others up from misery to enjoy life is pretty fulfilling.  Other than this, I know our respective worlds would be more enjoyable and purposeful if man's thought pattern could be more developed.  So far I'm not that much different, am I?  At the beginning of this writing I was fifty-one years young.  Before this book was completed I was sixty-six.  I have had two unsuccessful marriages and one happy, to which I'm still committed.  I have been well off and not so well off, both financially and psychologically.  I therefore, chose to have had a lousy and great attitude...depending on the circumstances.  I have been conditioned by morals, ethics, business and organized religion to name only a few.  I am a college graduate (don't feel short changed if you are not) and have not applied myself to what I spent countless hours and years learning - accounting.  I have a son and daughter.  I have worked in a sales capacity for some of the largest corporations such as IBM and Xerox.  I have had numerous other jobs.  Some only justified by the fact that they were convenient and provided an immediate income.  I sold water softeners on a pyramid program and garbage disposal services.  With most of these I was not successful or cared less if I had been.  I wanted survival.  I have been analyzed, refused and dismissed from employment.  I've always had excellent health and as sound a mind as my conditioning dictated.  I have been told by others that I could do anything I wanted and said they would, if they had, what I had going for me.   Perhaps you too have heard all of this before.  Perhaps you also feel, as I did, just plain purposeless, rudderless or disparaging in spite of how others evaluated your abilities.  At this point in my life the question was "Where do I begin?"  This was my consternation.  Does any of this sound familiar?
About twenty years ago I was introduced to some "How To" books and pursued their train of thought by continuing to read more.  They ran the gambit from winning friends to manipulating and intimidating enemies interspersed with ideas on positive thinking to the metaphysical approach.  The initial impact from several of these books was astonishing for a couple of days and then I'd return to being my old miserable self, full of doubts, guilt and insecurities.  It was beyond me to discover anything that would sustain those momentary highs.  After a number of such vacillations with each subsequent high based on more credibility than the last, I was presented a book by some unusual circumstances that would be the catalyst that literally changed my life.  The book narrated the communication between a woman (who the public may label a psychic) and a state of consciousness, soul, guide or spirit.  Call it what you may.  I sensed something unusual about the "guides" communication.  The ideas and thoughts were objective, lacking prejudice, void of judgment and applicable to men of all races, colors, creeds and lastly didn't offend me by being too far out.  There wasn't any mention of what chosen few could take advantage of the ideas.  I was instantly inquisitive about the philosophy, the source and the ability of a guide to assist me to discover more pleasure in life.  Fortunately the author had the insight to offer the means to make contact with one's own guide should there be any inclination to do so.  She suggested the means to be the Ouija board.  "Hold on, Not so fast," I told myself.  "Don't jump to a conclusion regarding her suggestion. You may be reacting as a result of what you have been taught."  You see, my belief system on the Ouija board was formed for me by my parents.  As a child I was forbidden to visit a friend whose mother was known for holding seances, tipping tables and using the Ouija board.  My recollections of this family, formulated by Mom and Dad didn't contribute to my acceptance that the "board" or anything connected to it or them could be useful.  This sentencing, provided by my parents, eliminated the possibility that anything but evil could result from their attempts to Ouija, contact Napoleon or levitate stuff.  I remember thinking as a ten year old, "This is exciting," and had I continued to believe my parents judgments this book never would have been written.  Reflect on how many rejections, prejudices or exceptions you allow that are the direct results of a parent's belief system and multiply that to the tenth power as the result of the other's suggestions.   In total disregard of past impressions of what would happen if I became engaged in the "occult," I rebelled against what Mom and Dad had taught me (at 50+, I felt the right to be insubordinate).  Guess what I did?  Yep, I sneaked into a toy store (another of my conducts manipulated by societies acceptance) and bought my Ouija board and sneaked back out as if I'd just registered my old dog, Muffin, at the pound for euthanasia.  I tried to feel indifferent when I bought this two foot square box assuming I was about to suffer the indignity of scrutiny by a store clerk's captive audience when I would be told what happened to her uncle, Billy Bob, when he went to "Ouija."  It's the sort of feeling I would have suffered as a kid in the 40's had I attempted to buy "rubbers" from a lady salesclerk.  The embarrassment originated from what I hadn't been informed about.  Today, if I were a child, no sweat!  I wouldn't have to buy them from anybody.  A grade school principal would probably issue me a couple packs along with a high protein lunch in the cafeteria with a short discourse on the merits of both while simultaneously threatening my parents with and ACLU lawsuit should they interfere with my rights of privacy or civil liberties.  
Well, picture the next scene.  We've got this thing at home with thoughts of it producing some of the occurrences we might see on HBO's latest horror movie.  Should we dare use it?  What then?  Remember, I was conditioned to the same doubts and expectations that you may have been.  
Obviously, the only answer to this was the unknown.  Anything can happen in the unknown.  Remember the movies!  This could be the sequel about to happen...another Friday the 13th complete with Freddie.   You know, the guy you can't get rid of - regardless of his last physical condition or location.  To minimize any aggravation of the "spirits", which was the last experience I wanted - a psychotic spirit I couldn't extricate - we prepared the room as we believed proper for such soul raising.  A little soft music, the lights adjusted just right with no glare and definitely not too dark, no booze or cigarettes (we smoked at the time), and the two of us sitting in straight-back chairs half scared to death at what we might be inviting into our house, forever - night and day!  Could there be anything worse than a permanent, invisible Freddie roaming through the house that you can't see?  With the limited advice on how to make the initial contact from the book I had just read, we courageously stammered as our hand shook on the pointer, "Is any, ah person, ah thing, ah with us tonight?"  We were almost delighted when nothing happened and felt even more comforted as we threw the "board" in the closet and turned on the TV to watch one of those "funny" sitcoms.  We were saved from the unknown for the night.  But, our curiosity got the better of us and we tried again, and again, until some three weeks later we got our first message...  "My name is Victor."
I have discussed our contact with Victor with others since our first contact only to have them look at us as though we were brushing with the wrong end of the toothbrush.  So, for the moment, try to simplify the idea to this.  On a person's physical death, what do you believe happens to his consciousness?  Does it get turned off like a light bulb.  If you believe it does, that's pretty much the end of it. You can then say, "See ya" or "Wanta beer, now that we've have our in depth talk?"  If you don't believe in the lights out theory, or choose to stretch your imagination, you may accept the possibility that consciousness continues to exist after physical death and may continue to communicate without attachment to physical form with other consciousnesses, some without and some with physical forms - like yours.  I admit, this requires a lot of objectivity, but believe, you could believe more unaware beliefs than this.  In any case, accept this as my only explanation for the moment.  If you don't, it doesn't really matter where any information is derived as long as it effects, in you, a greater peace of mind.  Who cares the source?
I gave much thought before starting this book how I could assist others in making a smooth transition from what they may not consider an acceptable source, to one they could cherish and obtain information from to their ultimate benefit.  After much reflection on our past experiences and failed attempts to provide this consolation to ourselves, we have concluded it best if we don't even try.  Pauline won't discuss our communication with Victor with anyone.  As for her reason...I consider that's her choice.  For those of you who will not consider this as another possible source for mortal assistance, I will only be empathetic because you could miss a lot by not being more objective.  Notice, as we progress with these new ideas and suggestions, if some offend you,  the defenses you use to justify your present beliefs.  There could be some benefit in just this awareness.  Try to be aware of why you believe what you do and the possibility there could be other ideas that may make you happier than those beliefs you have accepted.  There have been enough instances to reflect on in your life and history to realize the effect of preconceived ideas on man's belief system: women's right to vote, abortion, black pro athletes, Viet Nam war, and our respectful elected officials to name a few.
Conversely, don't absorb as fact  what I or anyone else says...unquestioningly.  This book is to help you think and assist your direction toward heightened awareness.  You will do neither by taking the words contained herein as truth without first accepting it as good and developmental for you.  I do not continue to believe what I read in the book that suggested the use of the Ouija was developmental.  My hope is that this book, as her's did me, will stimulate your interest to seek your own truths, wherever they may be discovered.  If you desperately need to know rather than to take the righteous approach and judge, this book, my dear seeker, is something to really sink your teeth into.  I realize that what I have written and the source from which it comes is not unnatural but most unusual.  But, you could say the same about advice from a billionaire.  There aren't too many around to ever feel "natural" with... assuming familiarity is the prerequisite.  If anything is natural, it should be the willingness and need to accept developmental ideas as beneficial and to talk about them openly.  If you find the source of these ideas objectionable, blasphemous etc., at least try to listen, rather than refute, what is said about life and how to enjoy it to it's fullest.  It is not for me to judge what you believe or to whom you would listen for comfort but in so many instances it is sad that you have blocked enjoyment by accepting only what you have been told and assimilated as truth.  I can accept your present attitude, whatever it may be, and as you read this book, I'm sure you will notice I was not prepared for the answers to many of my questions.  All of your questions will not be answered in this book.  Nobody will ever write such a book.  This I promise, however, if you have the sincerity to know and the fortitude to search for your own answers, 
here is one approach to discovery.  Before we proceed let me say this book could have been written in a thousand different ways, and has been.  The books that have been written on kindred subjects attest to an author's belief that his approach is a creditable and purposeful arrangement of his subject matter.  I am not attempting to attain credibility as a writer but as a thought prompter.  I haven't attempted parallelism, coherence, pronoun respect or all the other ingredients of a good novel.  This is not my attempt to entertain you.  I'd play tennis with you to accomplish that.  At times, therefore, I may appear unclear with my thoughts, the book poorly organized and flat, rambling and repetitious but I believe there will be enlightenment in the long run.  There may be subjects that are discussed to excess, that you may prefer not to discuss, or you may question why they were discussed at all in a book supposedly designed to heighten awareness and enjoyment.  My interest is to provide you a book that will leave you without an excuse to fail and an approach that is pragmatic for attaining whatever it is you may choose.  I'll be the first to admit, it is highly improbable for nothing or nobody, at least on this plane, will answer everybody's question or solve everyone's "problems."  But, if nothing else is gained, this book should get you out of the starting blocks.  It was my hope when I started seeking that the answers could assist me in finding more peace of mind.  At the outset I felt depressed in recognizing it required so much effort just to reach basic sanity.  I recognized my need (want) for money, acceptance and approval of others while simultaneously needing expressiveness and independence and a mate with whom communion and love existed without the associated stipulations.  I wanted to discover and experience what was of interest to me - my niche so to speak - without first denying myself the possibility to succeed by disabling my pursuit by first having to justify how I could succeed.  You don't have to be a psychiatrist to evaluate my state of mind at the time.  This was all taking place simultaneously with my second divorce, a condo in foreclosure granted me in the divorce proceeding, no car, no job, a bike to get to divorce court, no money and an attorney taking what was left over.  My questions were how to get going from pretty much the position of an indebted street bum.  I remembered thinking, 'They're better off than I - at least they're debt free and can qualify for some free soup and welfare.'  At this point in my life a lot of what could have been inspirational instructions I classisfied as too advanced.  There was too much disparity to account for before I could begin to apply their suggestions.  One book I read suggested beginning with a position of self-worth.  Well, that's all well and good if you know how to acquire it...other than this, that accomplishment alone would have solved all my problems at that moment.   I recall another book in which the author referred to selling life insurance and commenced his teaching from having been confronted with a million dollar life insurance premium prospect.  Beside the fact that I have never been an advocate of life insurance I was only slightly more offended that this guy had a job.  My thoughts were infinitely more basic like: how the hell did he get a job with million dollar spenders or better yet, how can I make enough, quick enough, to eat and pay my lawyer.  You know what I mean...don't tick me off before we get started.  
Now if this isn't common enough ground on which to start, tell me what is.  Hopefully, you're a level above this.  At the finale, I trust the ideas in this book will help you as much as they  have me.  Before going any further I suggest to those of you who are serious about changing your life for the better to acquire a spiral-ring notebook for the purpose of taking notes while you read.  This information will provoke many questions, doubts, contradictions and perhaps desecrations that I want you to write down as you proceed.  If you have ever been deluged with great jokes you'll know a similar feeling of wanting to recall the perfect one, the next day, but can't.  Don't trust your recall to remember all the nuances this book will prompt.  I am also going to tell you how to contact your own guide and the formulation of questions, as a result of your notes, will be invaluable toward this end.  The direction of your notes whether they imply dismay, disapproval, disgust or sundry other emotions will be less tentative relative to your need to know and provocation from this information.  Accept this as developmental.  It is the first step to awareness.

                       OUR FIRST CONTACT  xa

Consider this question.  If you could communicate with God or a source you could accept as Truth what would you have to say?  What questions would you ask?  What would you like to know?  Who or what would the answers benefit? Would you like to change something or everything?  Better yet, would you give a drip or even listen if you got an answer?  Interesting thought, isn't it?  Conversely, what questions would God answer?  Is there a God to answer?  If there is what would God want you to know?  Why?  Everything?  These questions will give you some perspective as to how we started to think upon realizing the possibilities with our contact.  What kind of answers were we going to receive, once outside a mortal's perception?  To be truthful we didn't have any objective or idea of what was going to happen.  I only had doubts and confusion regarding my life.
Pauline has never once asked a question, that I'm aware of, in the vein of how to best direct her life.  In our years of marriage she has been an almost perfect example of an A student of these teachings.  If she wants, she does.  She disregards negative thoughts.  She does not worry about what could happen.  She does not berate herself.  She does not judge herself for what others would consider "mistakes."  She directs her actions in a direction to please herself without the slightest reflection they could be offensive to others and honestly believes they are not because they are her acts of truth.  She lives in the NOW.
The contents I alone formatted as a result of my questions and am aware they seem to exclude Pauline - not purposefully, not egotistically.  Be assured, however, this book couldn't have been written without her.  My only interest when gathering the information and writing this book was that the information be acquired for myself and others who choose to use it.
One thing was obvious to us, or at least we took for granted, and that was we weren't in contact with God and therefore didn't break out the chisel and slate.  This knowledge, however created the next obvious question.  Who is Victor?  What did Victor want to tell us?  Why?  Furthermore, did we really want to find out?  For sure I wanted to know who Victor was/is.  I continued with the first nights questions as follows.
Q.  Where are you from?  Why contact us?
A.  No - enough - a process. 
Q.  What is the process?
A.  No
Q.  Why not tell us?
A.  Too soon.
Q.  Do you know time as we know it?
A.  Now is all.
Q.  Meaning?
A.  Now is all.
Q.  What should we do for greater awareness?
A.  You are aware - be still - know thyself.
(In this conversation we had asked about any former lives not fully convinced there was such a thing as reincarnation.  We were told that we were associated with him in Warwick when he was an Anglican priest in the country of Old Engleterre during the seventeenth century.  This prompted the next question).
Q.  How or why is it that we meet 300 years later?
A.  The process to know thyself.
Q.  Is this predestined?
A.  No - you chose to learn.
Q.  Learn what?  (You can see I was still a little drifty regarding my directions or rather wondering when Victor would start telling us something useful or with some direction on a more unsolicited basis.  You know, spill the beans, Vic, gimme a lotto number - make it easy.  I was slow to understand this was not his approach.  I would soon learn, I asked the questions, he would answer them.  No questions, no answers.  Neither of us ever got a feeling that he chose unsolicited communication.  On a few instances, he would add an extension to an answer, to clarify his answer).
A.  Live and learn.
Q.  Can you give us any advise on going to sleep tonight?
A.  Godspeed to you - dream in stillness - learn whyle you  
    sleep.
(This was our first contact and it had left us in exhausted exhilaration.  We were actually doing it.  This experience wasn't coming from a book.  We had actually bridged the gap ourselves and received answers that  we
found acceptable.  Us, a couple of real estate agents who didn't even sell Himalayan condos with a view.  (Oh, I forgot to add since one in three people in the U.S have a real estate license our uniqueness can be further discounted).  We continued to be apprehensive, cautious and awed until he ultimately calmed us with his patient, and above all, objective and loving manner.  At this point the learning really started.  You will notice that the interim conversations continued to be indefinite.  For those of you who will try making your own contact let it be known our beginning communications were not as clear as you read them here.  Much of it was scrambled and had to be deciphered.  It took us the better part of the first month before we eliminated the disorder in the communication on the Ouiji board).

          OUR SECOND CONTACT   xb

(The following evening we again questioned his presence and discovered to our delight that he was still present).
Q. How are you this evening?
A. Quite welcome.
Q. Do you communicate with others?
A. Yes.
Q. Someone living now?
A. ESP with 4 students 4 time - I will guide you.
Q. Do we have that correct?  You will guide us?  (I had no idea what he meant or could do to guide us.  Here I was past fifty and someone wants to guide me.  Furthermore, where would anyone want a fifty year old to follow.  From all I had read or heard I conjured up this thought - now we'll get to the nitty gritty of what he really wants from us).
A. Simplify 2 U - guide U yes.
Q. In your message last night you said "Be still."  What did you mean?
A. Free your thoughts.  Now U learn to live yes.
Q. Do you mean we worry too much?
A. Grow in love.
Q. What are your suggestions on freeing our thoughts?
A. 2 soon 2.
Q. Well then, is the process one of me just floundering about, asking abstract questions?
A. I guide you.
Q. Is this done with the awareness that you are always with us?
A. As need be.
Q. Is it acceptable to ask you for guidance?
A. I am aware.
Q. Are truths learned?  (I meant accumulated from former lives - assuming I could believe there was such a thing).
A. Now is all.
(This ended the second evening conversation as I sensed I wasn't getting anywhere.  Furthermore, I had no idea of what he meant or what tact I should be taking and rather than try to figure it out, in one evening said, 'Good night Victor').                                            
Victor replied, "I bid your Godspeed."

      OUR THIRD CONTACT   xc

The next evening...
Q.  Will you come into our home?
A.  Welcome.
Q.  Can anyone use a Ouija board to contact a soul?
A.  U learn different times.  Not all are at level you are in now.
Q.  What do you mean by level?
A.  2 learn 1 must yearn.
Q.  What is the most important thing for a mortal to        
    learn?
A.  2 know the self.
Q.  Do you mean what is right and wrong/good and bad?
A.  There is no evil - all is the process to discern truth.
Q.  Do you mean that we can do no evil, if, what we do is thought of as truth/good.
A.  Only as you believe.
(At this point I got confused but assumed I could write a long list of evils and wrongs.  Certainly my weekly $.50 allowance suffered drastically from having accommodated my dad with enough "wrongs" for him to justify giving me nothing but a bad time.  With such assurances that evils and wrongs did exist I felt it best to change the subject again and come back to this subject later when I was more prepared to prove my point).
Q.  Could you define to "know oneself?"
A.  Look within.  U see more each day.
Q.  How do we look within?
A.  Be still.  I guide you.
Q.  As in meditation?
A.  Some what - there is more.
Q.  What's the more?
A.  2 soon.
(Again, sensing my frustration by the vague but provoking answers, we ended the third evening conversation as I was completely baffled how to arrange any enlightening direction to the line of questions).

      OUR FORTH CONTACT   xd

The following night...
Q.  I would like to revert to our discussion of evil.   What do you call murder if it is not evil?
A.  U learn to accept expression.
Q.  Are you saying the murderer is just expressing himself?
A.  The process eliminates violent expression.
Q.  Is this another way of saying he'll meet his fate?
A.  He chooses to his knowledge.
Q.  Meaning he creates his own fate through the knowledge of what he does?
A.  Each one chooses his expression.
Q.  Do you suggest we improve our lives by being unconcerned that people are being murdered?             
    (I asked this question rather cynically in hopes of prompting an answer that would coincide with my beliefs).
A.  U will not be murderous nor murdered.
Q.  Have you ever been told you have a dry sense of humor?
A.  Tragic
(I continued to change the subject each and every time I felt the answers too unresolvable.  This appeared to be one of those times.  Most of my questions at this time were prompted by thoughts as a result of reading various "psychological" books.  Not many searching questions emanated from within.  I decided to question automatic writing...another theory I'd read about.  It was proposed that a contacted soul could render his answers by writing through us - his channel).
Q.  What can you tell us about automatic writing?
A.  Quicker than the board.
Q.  Will we be able to write automatically?
A.  Speaking is far superior to both.
Q.  Did we get that sentence correctly?    (At this point we were doubtful again; had we been too naive...again?  Maybe this was the point at which our "possession" started).
A.  Quite so.
Q.  Are you really capable of speaking through us?
A.  Perhaps we must proceed with humor.
(I'm sure he sensed our apprehension of his suggestion from what Pauline and I had to say to each other about his suggestion.  He continued...).
A.  You will know my wit eventually.  Proceed at your level of understanding.
Q.  Should we be so apprehensive?  Automatic writing is one thing but speaking through us is another story.
A.  I wish you only good.
(I kept thinking that's what anybody would say if their real intent was to do you in - like Freddie always does)!
Q.  Are you aware of all knowledge?
A.  Not on all levels.
Q.  Of which levels are you aware?
A.  Several.
Q.  Can you be more specific?
A.  2 soon.
Q.  Some of our friends and many books describe frightening contacts with souls.  Why do we seem to be so "fortunate?"
A.  You are not afraid of knowledge.
Q.  Do you mean non-seekers are more likely to be frightened?
A.  Like attracts.
Q.  You say it is too soon for us to look within.  Why?
A.  It will come.  There is much to discover.
Q.  Will you provide this input in an unattended way or will the information be provided to us during automatic writing?
A.  5 yes 4 yes 3 yes 2 yes 1 yes
Q.  Will you explain that message?
A.  Steps to learn.
Q.  What step are we in presently?  Plus or minus...?  (Thought I'd add some  humor).
A.  Somewhat primary.
Q.  Is there any validity to the mortal idea that a person is what he believes himself to be?
A.  Yes.  Basic term to us.
Q.  Does the will of an individual account for his future?
A.  Assures wishes to succeed or fail.
Q.  Does the will effect success or failure?
A.  Yes.  Without doubt.
Q.  Is astrology a truthful process?
A.  For their level of awareness.
Q.  How many levels of awareness are there?
A.  2 many to recall here.
(Again I did not feel a clear line of questioning or direction in the discussion and asked the final question of the night).
Q.  What line of questioning would you suggest we pursue to attain a higher level of awareness?
Simplify 1 step each time.  Godspeed 2 you.

                        OUR INTRODUCTION TO
                          AUTOMATIC WRITING      XE

(It was over a month since we had begun to use the board that we had this conversation).  
Good evening Victor.  It's been a while since we've talked.
Yes fare thee well.
Would you like to say something to us?  (We weren't yet fully aware that he would converse only if questioned.  This was our approach to have him enlighten us - which he wasn't about to do, without our interest to know).
Fare the well.
Are you wishing us good night or a Happy New Year?  (It was the second week in January).
Another time.  You may write now.  Do not fear.
(This was the first night that we attempted automatic writing.  We had no further discussion regarding what we felt, was his ''queasy'' suggestion to speak through us.  However,  inwardly we trusted his suggestion as the only acceptable way to speed up the communication.  I had the same feeling as a child when my elders suggested I gulp down a couple tablespoons of castor oil for whatever ailed me at the time.  A means to speed things up a bit ).
How do we begin?
Ask and receive.
Do you write through me?
Questions please.
(At this point our apprehension returned to doubt as to what was going to happen.  I wrote out another question as I had done before, but rather than placing our hands on the Ouija pointer, I held the pen in unknown expectation.  Nothing happened.  We tried the Ouija board again and Victor provided the following message).
Pauline will write out the answers.  U ask and write out the questions.
(I would understand the reason for this later and rather reluctantly, as I would many of his answers.  We continued with my first question).
What religion comes closest to the Infinite Intelligence/Universal Mind/God?  (You can tell I didn't know what to call IT).
There is no one group that is totally in tune with the infinite mind.  Several are aware of and practice some facets but are not completely aligned with the infinite mind.
Has Christianity confused man's mind, rather than clarified his alignment with infinite intelligence?
Christianity has been more harmful than good for real Christians.  There is much to learn if we can only separate the lessons from the fictional accounts of the 'supposed' lessons.
Are you referring to the Bible as fictional accounts and supposed lessons?
Most assuredly.  The bible is a wonderful collection of folklore and for many it has been the source of some very interesting philosophy.  It is at times humorous, frightening, dour, enlightening, morbid, gay, and sundry others.  You should treat it as a well edited collection of short stories, all fictional.
Victor, you have indeed, by that comment, given us ample reason to believe that to be "in tune," we must first feel well justified to undo what we have been conditioned to believe.  It seems difficult to think about discarding all our Christian ethics in search of a new beginning.
Yes.  There is difficulty in letting go of all your props, as it were.  You will find great relief in not carrying forward burdens from the past.                                                                                    I start to get confused when you sign off with Godspeed, Victor, and yet you say the Bible is folklore.  Who is God/Jesus/etc., etc., to you?  Do your beliefs relate to our conventional belief; are they synonymous with infinite mind; just what?
The expression is a loving sentiment, not necessarily to mean "the speed of God (SIC)/God".  God is a convenient catch-all for the 'unanswerable' questions.  There are no such questions - only un-comprehendible answers.  Do you see my distinction?  The authors of some of the material you have read are trying to 'simplify' to the point that it is insulting to our intelligence.  Anyone's intelligence.  The premise of the material is good but they lose the total validity by attributing the whole works to 'God.'  God is - you - me - creativity - Not some omnipotent FATHER on high watching his little lambs screw up!  (Sorry for the wording but it does get my ire up when some persons - in the guise of educating - purport more confusion into man's already avalanched comprehension).  Jesus was a very advanced "prophet."  His teachings at least were very advanced and therefore he was outstanding in historical lore. There were many teachers of his caliber at that time but not so well known (or so well publicized).  Who/What/Where/When/How?  Do you perceive him/her/it/them? to be?  It, as I will remind you, many times, is your choice!  My beliefs (perhaps I should say choices) are my choices after having been through a very intensive learning period.  Infinite mind - intelligence are the closest I can come to a simple explanation.                                                                                                                                             If there is no right or wrong with Universal Mind, why did you pardon yourself when you used the verbiage "screw up?"                                                                                                         It is not exactly indicative of my vast vocabulary and only on rare occasions do I stoop to use of the vernacular, but at this time it seemed most appropriate.
How should man reflect on Infinite Intelligence - with awe, paternalism, reverence, humility, holy?  Those concepts to which I'm conditioned seem to dissuade me from having become more involved.  Why is that?
'Man' is part of Infinite Intelligence.  He should/will/does look upon it as an integral part of himself - and himself a part of it.  Those who look upon it as a separate - omnipotent 'force' are deluded and do not enjoy their full awareness.
How do you suggest the mortal establish the knowing that he is created by Universal Mind?
He 'creates' therefore he IS - he is part of it and it is part of him.  
Can he prove that to himself on this plane?
Proof?  Rod - this line of questioning has no point.  Of course not Rod - he must KNOW it - therefore it is - it is not to be proven.  Use your own mind to discern these conclusions please.
What's your definition of knowing?
Perceiving - discerning your own true thoughts.  I cannot emphasize enough that your own TRUE THOUGHTS (thence TRUE CHOICES) are the key!!
What's the difference between knowing by proof and knowing?                                             
Having proof means you have assured others (or will).  Knowing is almost a sixth sense - What is - is!
Why does proof relate to assuring others rather than the self?
You don't need proof - unless you're trying to tell someone else that you KNOW!!
In line with the idea of trying to prove something to myself I have attempted to move an object suspended from a thread and get it to move by the process of thought.  So far I've been unsuccessful.  Is there a different object I could suspend that would be more responsive than others?  ( I had read some books discussing bending spoons, directing compass needles, moving hanging objects all by concentrating the mind and thought if I could accomplish such feats I could consider myself...psychic, advanced or something.  Looking back... I feel nerdish attempting to justify myself by such "abilities").                                                                        Why don't you just suspend YOU - these little "tests" are becoming rather COMICAL - DON'T YOU AGREE.  Look for affirmation of you knowing - not your doubts!
I just thought I could start on a small mind control test...dahhhh.  
If you must FOOL YOURSELF - your choice my dear!            
OK let's skip fooling myself and go for moving the Sierra Madre mountain range!
OK! Let's go!
Or better yet, let's tilt the axis so we have more sun on the front porch!
That may affect too many CLOCKS - inconvenient and all that ROT.
Are you just going to agree with me or don't you understand my interest to prove mind control to myself?     
I see the "testing of the pond before you jump in."  It is quite "normal" Rod - only not very necessary.  It does denote a lack of "faith" but until you have 'proven' these teachings, I will forgive your apprehension.
Frankly, I thought this "test" to be more a measure of awareness than to have it be the basis for one's lack of faith.  However, if this is appraised as a test of my faith I shall cease with the joviality.                           
I would certainly never determine your motives, my lad.  In my opinion, it could be testing the "water."  The sign is a placebo - would you agree?  Perhaps youngsters need it but I didn't feel you do - I felt you KNEW that your interests are what you have chosen and will manifest.       
I've also been prompted to wonder by some of the Seth books (another spriritual guide) I've read what effects you could produce.  Don't you think that could be interesting/fun?
What do you want?  That is the point!  For fun I could flicker the lights or shake the 'tree' but I know you didn't want apparitions or strange noises.  What would be acceptable?
It would have been acceptable, if yesterday, you would have told Ellen (a friend of mine) her mother's maiden name.  (I meant this sarcastically because, the day before, in his "disinterested" manner he hadn't provided an answer to prove his existence to some acquaintances we had introduced to Victor).                                  
If this were a very relevant question I would have pursued it more intently but is that the question or is it, "Are you REAL??"  It can be extracted and it is available but there are more important questions.
When she was asking you questions you said you would answer her questions if she would ask specific questions.  She did and your answer was incorrect.  Was I set up, if as you say, the answer "can be extracted?"
I feel that I was set up - in other words - If you don't answer this question - I won't believe - that is not relevant - in my humble opinion. Ha Ha.
OK, how about broaching this subject by a little entertainment from "your side."
Rod - what are you getting at?  If I did something 'physical' it would scare your pants off and if I 'appeared' to you it may not be as you have pictured me and I wouldn't want to surprise you or disappoint you.
I'm thinking more of the experience.  We could agree in advance what was mutually acceptable.  Beside, isn't awareness understanding the experience?                     
I'll let you know when it seems like the 'right' time for it.  You have a lot of other 'experiences' to understand.   
Does that mean that only the aware can experience such occurrences/happenings?
If - in fact - they do experience it.  (Or are they just very visual in their 'belief')?
I've heard where a contact such as yourself could put a message on the tape of a recorder.  Could we do this sometime?
There could be a time for this (test) but my "voice" may be quite foreign to you and may alter our "conception" of each other.
How do you mean foreign?
Not as you envision it - perhaps distressing (with no intention on my part) until you know a bit more about 'our' plane and the difficulty of "transmitting" in your "vernacular."
I will respect your observation if you don't think I'm prepared.
Thank you Rod.  I feel this is not yet the time - but when the time is right - you will be the first to "know."  
Agreed?
It is not that I'm requesting a sign by asking this question but what can you do to show us your capacity in this area?  (I wasn't quite prepared to let the subject drop if I could convince him to provide some entertainment and continued to be a pain in his rear).
Would you like that I rattle your windows - (blow out your NON-EXISTENT fire)?  What would you consider fair PROOF?  That your life has changed?  The atmosphere?  The circle of acquaintances?
None of these.  I only ask because my curiosity questions why so few signs are provided.  I suppose from your vantage point you can be blase about gaining attention but I'm interested in what curbs this activity from being exposed more in this plane?
The 'demonstration' is often frightening and discourages further communication - Not "meant to be" but that is often the case.
Since I'm getting nowhere with this subject let me ask you a question regarding God.  I heard a philosopher state yesterday that he has concluded God exist but that he could not so easily prove God's benevolence.  Any comments?
In his view - "God" doesn't have time (or need) for man - I would tend to disagree with that - (again) the whole purpose of God/god/UM is that he/it/we are created by "it" so it is a moot point.             
Concerning your succinct answers - are all souls naturally endowed with such concise thought and ability to communicate?
I am sure all understand the subtleties I have conveyed to you, however, communication of 'our sort' is very unusual and therefore many entities do not have the opportunities that I have, to "show off."
Why is it unusual?  Isn't it more our opportunity than yours?
Most do not care to be involved with 'mere mortals' but again, most do not come into contact with such delightful ones as you.  It is my pleasure, believe me!
Do you get into philosophical debates about teaching us mortals, with souls on your plane?
There is a variety of opinions on which 'method' is most effective - My belief is honest communication - on any subject - in the vernacular - I suppose that comes from being a teacher of sorts) for many lifetimes and seeing how miserable one can fail to get an idea across when talking down -- (a bit of humor)?                         
(His reference here, was obviously to his former life as a minister and how he looked down on his parishioners from the pulpit).
If you realized this in your incarnation as a Father/minister you must have given some unacceptable sermons - as viewed by the church.
I myself was not educated enough to be really inspiring - as I might be now but alas - that is past (and I do not choose to change it or re-live it).
From a personal observation why is it that with all my formal religious teachings I don't take your statements as blasphemous and almost want to accept them?
Because (I) vocalize what you had been thinking since you were old enough to question the material.
What does this tell me about myself?
You knew enough to question - not to take someone else's 'truth' for your own - to look for more than the neatly tied package 'religion' seemed to be.
If the bible is folklore why does there seem to be such a parallel of events?
They are 'predictions' just as those printed in the tabloids.  Some are coming TRUE because persons have chosen to enact them.  They are good guesses!
What is the difference between "folklore" and "Oldlore?"
It begins with the spelling.  There is only the difference of semantics.  Folklore is, in my terms, common stories, laws, handed down generation from generation.  Olde Lore is probably a bit of fantasy, mixed with a bit of mystery and labeled wisdom.  At least by those of us who expound upon it.
How did a story get started that Jesus rolled back his tombstone to the cave and escaped?
Yes some clever 'moves' there and good PR.
So the whole story was rigged?
Well he did go into the cave and three days later he was not in the cave.  What do you think happened to him?
I'd need a motive to surmise.
They were hostile enough to nail him to the cross - if I were him - I'd get out of there pronto!
Real funny.  Since he didn't walk out I can assume someone else had a motive.
I think he had some help and he was taken out of the area "surreptitiously."
The question is why?
He didn't especially want to hang around there!
I can see this subject doesn't delight you.
No - I think it is crass to make such a gory scene - the delight of movie-goers and serious 'history' buffs.  It is maudlin and in very poor taste!
Has this ploy on mortals been a topic of conversation on your plane?
Not in particular!  There are so many other instances of ignorance!
Just think of all those poor little ducks that have suffered the humiliation of being dipped in purple and red dye at Easter.  All for naught.
That is quite a different custom - at least that has some basis in originality.  By giving the children each a baby chick - the tribes assured that there would be eggs and, later, meat to eat when the winter season came.
In what country did this custom start?
It was widespread in the Asian and Indian empires.  It was a celebration of the beginning of spring and the end of winter.
What do you have to say to people who believe all this and that Jesus is our savior and God our creator?
Hello - Goodbye!
A great way to do a shoo-fly!
Yes that is one of my 'talents' - never investing too much 'time and effort' in 'losing propositions.'
I know you've explained this but if we are a part of something doesn't it seem logical that we were created by it?
Universal Mind is a part of all of us - it is the product not the origin.  Do you see?
How do you derive a product without an origin?  Do you see?
Adam and Eve were created and we are derived from.  Is that your question?  (My statement is put in simple terms).
No.  The question is, what is the origin of all that is?
There was a creator.  This is a mystery that's very difficult to understand.  You believe and understand it as Universal Mind or God.  This is a mystery that you should not break you head or let say give you a doubtful headache.  Just believe in God or Universal Mind - however you choose - you will not be wrong.
So much for the total understanding of that question, eh, Victor?  Perhaps we can return to this question later. 
I recall seeing some ministers on TV philosophizing about Christianity.  They felt the general consensus of Christians is that they feel it would be nice to be able to package the philosophy - put it on the mantle - and say, "I've got it."  Do you sense us using you in the same way: us choosing to believe your views as a crutch, consolation, guide or an "I've got it, package?"
I suppose it could be construed as a 'crutch' but one must learn the steps somewhere - as surely as a child must learn to tie his shoestrings.  He could probably - in time figure it out for himself - but in the interest of time and using his time for more advanced learning - someone teaches him the simple method and later he may improve upon it.
Why does the Bible make the suggestion that we should not communicate with the spirit world - or something to that effect.  I know many, to whom we've mentioned our guide,  are afraid of you as the result of religious teachings.
The reference to having no 'false gods' before me - I presume is your question - the protection of one's "turf."
What about religious statements like, "Confession to God, in heart and soul, makes man able to approach perfection?"
To God? Who then plays God?  George Burns?  Confession - or honesty should be with the self - meditation is awareness of your honesty with your self.
Parts of that book are excellent - and honest - but it includes much 'learned response.'  I would venture a guess that the author (or publisher) is a dyed-in-the-wool - catholic evangelist sort that has taken the guise of honest teaching and is simply fostering his beliefs in another - less orthodox form.
You say there is no one religion that is in complete alignment with Universal Mind.  What name would you suggest be applied to the practice that was?
Awareness.
What do people feel/mean when they say they are "saved."
I supposed - saved - from what - I can't imagine?  Seriously, I'm sure this is a point of realizing there is much more to life than a mere 7 or 8 decades in Earth time.  When one realizes that this period is spent in very tedious lessons and when you graduate from (Earth) mortal life - it is too splendid to imagine in ordinary terms.  I guess that is what they are referring to.
They refer to it, but in general do they do anything about it?
Most do not!  A Pity!
What is the purpose of us being made mortals on Earth?
You must experience mortal feelings, thoughts, emotions, foibles before you can know the feelings, thoughts, emotions, and true comedy of immortality.  It is a training ground for the steps to other planes.
You use "true comedy" as encompassed by mortality - can you explain?
There is much encompassed by immortality.  Comedy is only one facet.  Comedy entails much more than humor.  It is perhaps one of the most basic lessons in human nature.
Does humor exist on other planes?
Humor is a 'true universal language.'  My idea of the humor of the universe in not the pity of it all but the irony.  The task of learning - teaching - existing.  Humor can change a problem into an asset, a jealousy into a joke, an enemy into a friend - Let's use it!  All must be perceived with a smile for this is the ultimate humor.
(My step-mother was sitting with us during this conversation and asked us to present this question:)
Why can't all souls be nice, sweet and fully developed and skip all the earthly trials and tribulation of learning?
My dear, you will have enough time in the plane of 'spirits.'  You were created in this plane to learn your 'steps' - patience above all and when you 'graduate' you will have the 'enjoyments' that you so desire.  Peace, tranquility and also humor.  The reason is not penance, so do not take that attitude.
Please explain what you mean by "foibles."
Foibles - Noun - pertaining to petty and harmful - time consuming - thoughts of greed, jealousy, envy, covetousness, so on adinfinitum.
I am beginning to be more conscious of one of my foibles - criticism.  Think I'll ever get to the "acceptable level?"  (This evaluation of myself was created by other's not finding interest in my newly found interest - awareness.  You might even say I was nothing less than righteous).  I've noted this attitude in some others initially delving into the "spiritual."  In time they have become less opinionated and intellectual.  Like me...ha ha!
You are aware it is non-productive.  Do you wish to continue with this behavior?  If, as I hope for you, you have realized that it is time consuming and non-productive.  I am sure you will know the answer to that statement.   Observation is for your own evaluation - not as a reinforcement of your stance.
I am concerned about being annoyed and judging others.
Rod, not long ago you were not even aware how 'lacking' some persons can be.  They can still be friends but you must overlook their lack of discernment or it will begin to be a detriment to your peace of mind.  Try to help them discern and when all seems lost, rise above.
Is it from lack of discernment that I become annoyed/concerned?
You are discerning.  When you judge - you know it.  When you discern you learn.  The facts are all in the interpretation of each observer so discrimination is as you view it.  Do you see?
I understand your point but a part of me still says it's a pretty cold attitude to simply discern an emotionally, stressed individual.
That's what traps you Rod - when some become 'emotional' they manipulate.
What would be their basic motive?
Attention - and perhaps 'habit' - it is hard to change one's stripes.  It is a great change from the conditioning you have had - all your lives - sympathize - empathize - wear down your emotions because others are sad or sick or helpless.  It is a great relief NOT to follow those dictates and the euphoria seems almost 'sacrilegious' in the face of others woes!  Keep in mind not to pronounce judgment but to watch, notice and discern (evaluate).  With practice you will overcome.
Victor, are you on a plane that can associate with all life, on other planets?
Some yes.  Some are distant, even to  me.  Many live in several planes - not on one planet.
Is outer space endless in terms of miles?
Endless in terms of light years - miles could not be counted -
As a child, I remember my impression of space was that it terminated by a "brick Wall."  I concluded my thoughts by wondering what was on the other side.  I have to admit my understanding isn't any clearer now.
No - no brick walls and as to the 'other side' - there is no distinguishable difference - except in your mind.
So physically you can go indefinitely?
Physically is rather questionable - in theory one can go on infinitely - mentally - perhaps, but not physically.
Why not physically?
Too much effort for too little reward - there is more in the six inches between your ears than the trillions of miles of 'space.'
Do you see any justification in our space efforts?
In what respect?  Expenditures?  Exploration?  Resources?  To bring back Rocks??
What about the feasibility of obtaining needed resources?   
More likely - needed resources will be found in the oceans of the earth.
If it's too much trouble to travel to the limits of space I must assume you are "located" in a area that you determine.  Can you expound on this?
Why 'extend' yourself when 'all that is' is within your own mind - literally!!  I have chosen to be where I am which is not a specific location but rather a range of many planes in which I can operate to my heart's content.   
Would you have the same planes available to you if you were a trillion light years away?
Yes - of course - for distance is only a 'state of mind' - so to speak.  You will see as we progress - now begin.
Now begin what, Victor?
This is your learning period, not mine.
Victor, I think I'll take a break for the day and come back tomorrow with some new question.  Until then, good night.

                           REINCARNATION?      

What can be said to a non-believer of reincarnation?
WAIT AND SEE -
Not a very convincing pitch for the magnitude of a possible next life, is it?
There are some folks whom you will never convince - in this life or any other! Rod, you do not have to 'sell' these ideas - give them to others if they have interest - if not, it is their loss.  They will find it sooner or later.  It is only those who have no confidence in their own reasoning power, who have a 'fear' of being sold.  The comprehension is directly relating to KNOWING - It is otherwise only a THEORY!
Rather than discuss politics I'd find it interesting to talk about some of these subjects with my friends but frankly it's difficult to discuss these subjects.  Ed's comment was a typical reflection of how other's judge your teachings.  (Ed was a friend of mine with whom I briefly discussed some conversations we'd had with Victor).
And is 'Ed' so highly evolved?  Let he who is without sin - or guile ($$) cast the 'proverbial' stone.  Rod, you will be bucking a very powerful machine!  Begin with yourself - then teach another - and another.  It will begin to 'snowball' - when I cannot say.  There is much 'propaganda' to conquer!  And Rod, there will always be those who will not pursue any other track than the one they are on - and so it goes.  The methods we have employed are sound and by your example, persons will begin to seek - (not soon - but very gradually).
I don't want to sound like the proverbial hypocrite but...confronting the reality of reincarnation catches me unprepared to admit that I believe in it.
The hypocrisy is not in saying what your believe - it is NOT SAYING IT!!  The basic question might include those concerning the 'soul'/mind/entity - where do they go?  The energy of thought/consciousness/intelligence, do they die with the body?  Can one 'perfect' his 'awareness' in one (relatively) short lifetime?
Has a mortal's consciousness ever been as free on this plane as his consciousness in the "after life" plane?       
The concept of mortality is not freedom - though it should be - it is when one does NOT need freedom that he finally GETS IT!
What effect does earth plane brainwashing have on consciousness after mortal death?
It doesn't have a lasting effect - It doesn't matter what is 'brainwashed' - it is the integrity of the consciousness to have learned the lesson or not - to develop or not.
What can be said to a person who feels that the consciousness does die with his body?  He may compare consciousness to the energy emitted by a transmitter.  Destroy the transmitter and you terminate the energy emitted by it.
Then you probably won't have much more to say to each other - if he does not consider reincarnation, he does not accept the concept of development and progressive awareness.
If we were truly developed how would we visualize nature?   
You along with the cooperative mind of Infinite Intelligence, create nature.  That is certainly an attainment of development.  In some other planes, you, also, will not require physical sites, sights, IE. tangible evidence of your creativity.
For the moment, however, I suppose we'll have to be concerned more about earth plane nature and its wonders. Should we dwell more on the benefits of nature?
It can become and obsession - this wonder of nature (and food)!  Just enjoy the benefits of nature - take what you need and leave a little. Simple -                                                               
No big deal, eh?
Yes - it is big and very important but not so that it becomes the main focal point of a rich life.  It is only part of the entire picture.
Do animals have souls and are they reincarnated?            
Yes, they do have souls, quite different however from human souls.  They can appreciate warmth and affection but also have basic survival instincts.  They do not choose existences as you do but instead are generally (there are exceptions) reincarnated only once - or rarely - two times.
Do they have a specific purpose?                            
Yes, but rather 'unspecific' in your terms.  Their main purpose is to keep intact the balance of the biological chain of nature.  There is a delicate balance and the eventual elimination of one species can upset the entire balance.
Do plants and animals have a part in our life as humans, aside from just being nature?                          
There is a reason for all life forms.  The smallest particles of form have a life force, there is energy in all that is and "all that is."  Aside from the balance of nature, the inanimate forms are much like storage batteries - brimming with energy to be used at a later time, perhaps even for your own delicate balance.                                                                                                           Fire ants - strange insect!  What is their reason or purpose on earth?
A challenge to man's ingenuity.  He will conquer this 'dragon' too.
Chemicals?
Perhaps just a big stick!  Hah!  Beat them to death.
Seriously, do you know how?  (Can't you just sense when Victor is disinterested in my line of questioning?)
I have not researched that particular problem but I presume it will be some miraculous new chemical which will find its way into all the hominy grits and present some new dread.  Always a new challenge.
Why is a new challenge created - always?
Supposedly for 'man'  - 'universally' there are no such problems.
That brings up an interesting question.  I have never had a cause, worked for a cause, tried to overcome one of mans' problems i.e. politics, disease, famine, illiteracy, poverty, etc.  Doesn't this sound like a classic case of leaving it up to the next guy?
Whom ever created the problem should 'take care' of it.  Personally, I would leave that sort of thing up to whomever will deal with it.  We have much more important areas in which to expend our energies.
Like trying to determine what allows certain birds to navigate?  Hum... Now there is a real baffling question.
They choose!  Really, Rod it is not that simple but they did choose this characteristic in their original form and they need it for survival so it is 'allowed' them  by the 'ultimate creativity.'
I'm sure the embellishment in that answer will provide the means to drive some scientists nuts.
Most are now!
Then the same must apply to turtles, salmon, whales?
We could go on forever in this subject.  The variety is endless and each has a very unique characteristic (for some it is hard to even justify their presence but that also is a choice).
Can you give me examples of other animals that have more unusual characteristics and why?
The salmon spawning, herds of moose crossing endless terrain to mate and establish their 'home ground.'  Bees - establishing their hives, protecting their queen and her 'suiters'  -  Each species has some characteristic - man has countless idiosyncrasies.
In other words, we could explain the birds and the bees if man could be understood?
The birds and the bees are simple - and I might add - predictable.  Man is neither!
Were animals, like mortals, created by mass consciousness?
Just for practice before they tried for the 'deluxe model.'
(The latter type answer always led me to feel as though he wasn't answering me seriously; didn't feel it was important enough to answer or wanted a more developmental question.  However, since time wasn't of the essence, I continued with my limited, mundane questions and felt we'd get there, wherever that was, sooner or later).
Do you mean by that, the human body?
Yes, they felt (or 'consciousness' felt) this was the ultimate creation (always room for improvement, though).  
How long ago and how many mortals initiated life on earth?
In terms of time, Rod?  Now, you know there is no distinction.  For now and ever - the 'pro' creators of all mortals were/are groups of thought energy - only creating for itself a manageable form in which to experience some of its 'created' pleasures - experiences - so on.
If this same thought mass created plant life why did it endow the process of thought to a plant?  (Reference - The Secret Life of Plants)
Their purpose is to provide the earth with needed chemicals, gases and minerals (transformed through photosynthesis to usable materials).
Is there a purpose, designed by Universal Mind, as to why plants respond to our thoughts or have thoughts of their own?
They are responsive as all life forms are.  In response to human thoughts, they anticipate needed materials for the survival of the 'higher' but very vulnerable life forms.
Then inanimate objects also respond to our thoughts?
Definitely.  it is an imperceptible (to you) response however.  Inanimate objects are very aware of human (or lower animate) needs and can change their very makeup to suite your demands.
Do animals survival instincts suggest they have a choice to enable adaptation to their environment?
The questions basis is whether or not they have made a choice - and how can they without thought?  It is a moot question.  They are instinctive, not choosing.  They are "at man's mercy" so to speak - 
Without thought, what does an injured animal feel?
PAIN!!  It is only a physical response at that level - he does NOT wonder why or take it as a physical offense - he just hurts!!
In relation to an animal, how do we differ from what we are to learn from our experiences as both animal and man experience the same stimuli of sight, smell, etc?
The difference is that man has all the senses of the animal plus thought!!
What's your attitude toward people who pour their hearts out to animals - perhaps believing their dog is thinking, "Man, do I dig this new coiffure...and these new soy sauce dog bones...YUmmmmm!?
Which is more stupid?  The human or the animal?
I get the distinct impression your teachings are geared more toward developing than admitting our faults...and where we may ultimately find ourselves.
Quite simply, re-incarnation - or constant incarnations - are a bummer!  Is it not 'better' to accomplish all your quests in one lifetime, than to pick up a fragment here - an inkling there - and so on?
As a mortal did you ever feel as though you'd like to know a lot more about "all that is"?
Of course.  I wanted to KNOW IT ALL!!  It's not impossible  - you know?  The only drawback is that you become so ethereal that the earth plane doesn't offer much in the way of education - HA HA - I'd as soon spend earth time on earth!  Good night all!

                                  SOULS   

We ended our last discussion on the subject of earth and I have a question regarding its population explosion.  Are there enough souls for all the bodies - or visa versa?
One soul, as you use the term, may occupy more than one body, at any given time.  Your physical incarnation, as the man in this room, is only one facet of your many dimensional soul.
Have we ever met "facets" of our many dimensional soul?
You have knowledge of others with whom you have an affinity of soul, however, it is most difficult to be two places at one time with your limited view of time and space.  You will have contact with your other dimensions at times but it will be very hard to communicate with one another.
What would be the result of two people meeting with affinity of souls - would there be an exceptional attraction?
You will have an attraction to each other as though there were some invisible bond between you, which there is.  You may not be able to communicate this to another, however, you will both be deeply stirred by it.
Could our own soul have facets on other planes/planets?
The soul has many dimensions.  You may share a soul with incarnations on many planes, planets, as you say, and times.  If you can free your thoughts, and be receptive to these notions, I may be able to demonstrate at some future meeting.
(I did not ask what he meant by the last sentence.  I had enough tangential thoughts to concern myself with and continued with my existing line of questioning).
What role does our affinity soul plan in this search?  It seems to me that by diverging one souls objective, by having many facets out, the lesson would be weakened or lose intensity.
The physical incarnation is neither the first nor the most important, it is just one step in the process of many.
Are we capable of being aware of having been through these many steps on various planes?
Some are conscious of some incarnations, seldom all recall each incarnation.  You may recall in dream state or light trance state.
How is it possible for certain souls who have obviously gained all knowledge to live in other planes to use their awareness or immortality to haunt or frighten us mortals.   I'm referencing books,  movies and friends experiences in this question.
Obviously, these souls have not gained all knowledge.  They, as many such undeveloped souls, may be in an interim state.  Also they do not intend to frighten other, just fear of the unknown.
Your interpretation of immortal is rather misleading.  Because they are not in physical form, does not make them immortal, only not mortal.
What is your definition of immortality?
It is not a simple phrase to explain.  It is the level of highest development.  Not only as the mortal advances, but also, many stages of development of which your are not aware.  This may include many instances of teaching others, learning from teaching, being taught by more advanced souls, and eventually reaching a state of development as creative as our infinite source of creativity.  There is more to development than customary thoughts of good and evil.
Why do we mortal cling so tenaciously to the concept that there is good and evil?
Without "knowing" what else there is, how does one know to expect more?
What prohibits one from knowing "what else there is?"  I'm sure most everyone feel he "knows."
Many think they know "everything" Ha  HA  HA.  They "know" the least!
Well, I wouldn't admit to knowing everything but I do admit to knowing my thoughts...but I'd say you're about to dislodge that belief. eh Victor?
There is always room for improvement - Your TRUE THOUGHTS may be more indiscernible than you expect Rod - record you TRUE thoughts today - and see if they are the same tomorrow - the 'next day' -
This is an extremely subtle suggestion made by Victor and one that I urge you to try.  We'll refer to one list of thoughts as a list of affirmations.  The idea is to list today, in order of priority, your choices, needs or as some refer: "Gotta have's."  Look at your list daily and change priorities or choices at will.  You will be amazed what familiarity, time, circumstances and emotion will do to your original list.  Try it.  This is a lesson in awareness and one that will alleviate a lot of senseless yearning in your life).
Is it just a matter of being aware of one's vacillations?
First you must KNOW your own TRUE thoughts - before you can discern a change in them -
In spite of not knowing our own true thoughts isn't it possible to pursue situations that are "wrong" - morally wrong?
You could if you wish.  As always, Rod, there is a choice.  You could do 'wrong' in other states than dreaming but choose not to.  The choice is always yours.
(I did not understand his reference to dreaming and continued).
In other words - "wrong" is as each person perceives it?
That is correct. Each personality has his own evaluation of 'right, wrong, good, evil.'  (I am using these terms to explain emotions - there is really no such distinction).
Each chooses his own value system and lives according to it - although some compare that to a set of values determined by mankind in general and then can confuse the terms 'good - evil' etc.
The system seems to be against the individual choice.  The majority rules - that's the 'norm', etc., all are designed to eliminate such choice and if you appear to be exercising your choice - it frightens people.  This is an annoyance but retain your stand and you'll overcome it - otherwise - you give the annoyance power over you!
Knowing your choices - not just "going along with the flow" - to choose your emotions - not to RE-ACT to others emotions.  It is quite a revelation when one can look at his own choices - OBJECTIVELY and see what his choices REALLY are - not the facades he has chosen.  Without 'civilizations' influence many people have lived quite well for centuries without any 'problems' - perhaps more are coming to the realization that it (civilization) is the problem - not people!
To your real question: each has a choice - there are certain steps that each must take in order to develop one's soul.  You may take them running or creeping but you must take them.  You 'know' if the path you are on is the 'right one' when you feel that you are happy, loving, learning and sharing.  I am not being 'coy' (as in the movie Semi-Tough where it was implied the 'IT' was easy and if you didn't get IT you were an absolute moron).  You know when your life works for you - no one else can judge it - no one else can change it.
The difference is all in one's perception of reality!  It is as ever - your choice!
It's difficult not to want some measure of your progress but eventually you will see that the only measure of this comes from within - are you ecstatic happy?  reasonably happy? relatively happy? average, fair?  You see it must be your judgment - alone.
You say it's a revelation to look at one's choices objectively.  Where in the process does subjectivity have any application?
The process eliminates UNNEEDED subjectivity (unconscious involvement) and makes one aware when he is choosing to be subject.
Rod - subjectivity is NOT altogether UNDESIRABLE.  It is only UNDESIRABLE when it is unknowingly applied and creates confusion and dismay.  Objectivity is desirable in cases where one has first made a true choice - If the choice has been made on a 'gut level' - not involving superficial element and one can then proceed OBJECTIVELY  - he will surely prosper.
Hummm.  Ok, but I don't understand how one can make a true choice objectively.  It would seen to me it would be best to make a true choice subjectively.
Perhaps we are missing the understanding by the definition of the words involved.  Of course one is subjective in a choice.  It is impossible not to be.  The advantage is to be as objective as possible once the choice has been made even though it is premised by an emotional involvement (if only on a sub conscious level).
Let's discuss my choice of a car.  What could be an objective attitude and what could be a subjective attitude?
Good example!  If you were 'subjective' - you'd have seen the car - jumped with joy - asked for the keys and driven away - Wallah - Choice made - choice accomplished.  As it was, you saw the car - looked at it objectively - concluded that was a good choice and set about obtaining it through sane and acceptable measures.  Wallah!!  Choice made - Choice accomplished (almost).
All right!  Now we're getting somewhere.  I like the first approach...if you're asking.
If you can see it objectively you have made a correct choice that will be beneficial to you.
Let's clarity this further by applying objectivity and subjectivity to a conversation we might observe between Pauline and Kristi (Pauine's stepdaughter).
The objectivity is the key.  If you are - you would observe and discern a conversation.  If you are subjective you would see your wife and your daughter in an emotional dialogue.
Is this discernment: observation without judgment?
It can be but it is primarily seeing or knowing a separate 'object' or 'objective' action.
What's the difference between objectivity and discernment?
One cannot be discerning without being objective but one can be objective and still not discern!
Where or when is subjectively desirable?
The subjectivity would be used when one chooses to be 'emotionally involved' (that can include manipulation but also can be very pleasing).   Occasionally one should be subjective to recall the entrapment that it once involved and to know he can be objective at the "drop of a choice!"
If man were to be totally objective would he eradicate love?  Isn't love subjective?
By becoming completely objective, man can clear the path to REAL sensitivity - which includes LOVE - JOY - WONDER - KNOWING ETC.
To put this "jective" thing in a nutshell, why is it suggested to be objective and discerning in arriving a TRUE CHOICE?
The emotions should be held aside in determining true thoughts as they are what manipulates and disguises the truth.
(The preceding answer is the reason I suggest to the reader to make a list of choices.  You will be amazed how they vacillate over time to where you will wonder if you will ever make a true choice).
Like suppressing hate for someone?
Yes - suppression especially!  It does no good for you and it is best to throw it out of your thoughts and choose to go on to constructive thoughts - not DESTRUCTIVE!!  VIOLENCE and BITTERNESS only hurt you!  Do not even treat them as possibilities.
On your plane are there any emotions from which your are best rid?
Not really - we do not concern ourselves so much with the 'lesser' human foibles as guilt - envy - jealousy, etc., - more so with wonder - joy - expectancy and the like.
Incidentally, is this lesson designed to eliminate all compromise with one's self?
It is a lesson to illuminate your own TRUE  thoughts!  You already know you will not compromise.
Is this more of what we must learn to escape another incarnation.  If it is, we could be back a few more times.
You are learning your lessons well, but please, let us not get the cart before the horse.  Your lessons are along the lines of discernment, experiencing different emotions that will expand your awareness of others' emotions, seeking the truth and light that is all about your but shrouded in darkness and confusion.
How can "experiencing different emotions" expand my awareness of "others' emotions?"
To understand others emotions and sensitivities , you must first understand and experience your own.
Understand or just be aware of them?
See and discern, that is the beginning of understanding.  Awareness is having experienced and developing awareness through having experienced!
I don't feel very sensitive to others emotions although I've got some I'd rather be without.
Yours are most important thus yours come first, the awareness of others will come in time and as needed - not in a deluge that inundates all your waking hours.  
You also say, "Seek the truth and light..."  What is the difference between truth and our own evaluation of right/wrong/good/evil?
The use of the word entails many "discernment's" - it is your interpretation of what is true.
Then it must follow that we provide our own shrouding of darkness.
Yes, of course, by not pursuing the truth!  By not seeking awareness!  By not discerning what your experience!
(I'd like to make a note to the readers at this point regarding discernment.  Many of us can look at a child who may insist on touching a hot light bulb and wonder why it is they haven't learned it's hot and that it will continue to burn them every time it's touched.  I suspect our guides wonder why it is we continue to repeat some of our lessons without learning we'll get the same results if we choose the same experience).
You say truth is as each perceives it.  If that's the case why not let well enough alone?  We all perceive, so we must already know the truth.
The perceiving is the key!  Of course we all have TRUTH within - as we have access to all KNOWLEDGE - it is only the recognizing of truth that is 'our life's work' that is the reason for these earthly incarnations.
What us the common denominator of truth?
You are becoming very balanced in your views.  I think you are asking a slightly different question than you have stated - Is there a common denominator?  And the answer is - there can be but is very elusive.
I stand corrected.  You're correct.
The common denominator is that we each have one - and we 'allow' the other to have his even though it may be in conflict with ours.
Where does one learn all these steps and learn to practice them unless he has a guide or reincarnates a few hundred times?
These are all available from within - if one has the time and patience to seek them.  The most difficult is patience (for most entities) the others are knowing you have a choice and exercising that ability, tolerance (also patience) equanimity with one's self - peacefulness in your decisions, empathy for others, curiosity and on an on.
Why are we reincarnated in the first place if we've already experienced mortality and know the merits of the non-mortal plane?
You have learned much, in each incarnation but you have not, gained all knowledge necessary to live in some places.  In each incarnation you move one step closer to true knowledge.  As for the periods between, it is a time to rest your mortal self and try to gain insight from the experiences your have lived in that period.  Remember, Rod, you must take each and every step and you must take them in the prescribed order or you may lose the continuity of a pattern of thought or an idea.  These are the basic steps to perfect the soul and become a 'creator'!  That is the ultimate goal.
I see a great need to introduce our youths to this "philosophy" so that they won't have to reflect on life as so empty.  What are they so desperately lacking that would require drugs or suicide?
Each chooses!  The lifetime they choose may be front with obstacles or they may "breeze" through as so many more do.  The drugs - fee sex - problems are chosen much before they are teens or even in this plane.  Sad - that they choose such but also look at the 'triumph' over adversity that many go through.  This is the testing ground they have chosen.  Many choose such adversity for others' benefit (so the others can rescue them - so on) but it is their choice.  You may influence but never make the choice for them - only for yourself.
I get the distinct impression that your brand of development is not being overly concerned with "getting along" with people.  It appears to be more concerned with eliminating the unfavorable environments of mental and physical for the self.
Correct - one has to 'get along' in the environment he chooses to exist in but that does not mean he should strive to 'buddy up ' the whole world.  My philosophy is let them be and ( mostly) they will let you be.  The 'prize' will be when you no longer have to deal with such and can 'tune them out.'  I can see where this idea will meet resistance.  Many still believe there is nothing else to life but the inadmissible facade of good friendships and acquaintances.
When I think about what you're trying to teach us, it still seems unchristian not to try and love everybody.
If you choose to love thy neighbor - turn the other cheek - bear another's burden - go ahead and enjoy your martyrdom - I simply do not choose that way of 'life.'  It is apparent to me - only after many lives of suffering dedication to others - and being a compost heap for my fellow-mans' problems that I came to the realization that one can only live one's own life - suffer his own injuries - and conquer his own problems.  You are doing others a disservice by taking on their 'problems' for then you have made their choice.
Your best friends are not those who smile and slap your back (then turn on you) they are ones whom you may not see for months or years at times and when you do - you know that they are true friends.
What's behind the paradox of seemingly the more one friend does for another the more likely that friendship will be destroyed?  I believe the military phrases it, "fraternization breeds contempt."
Perhaps it is basically that 'helping' him relieves him of his own choice - no matter how altruistic the intent!  Fraternization doesn't breed contempt - manipulation does!
Does awareness and development have an inherent capacity to make one more impersonal?
When one realizes that he is responsible for himself first  - it has a tendency to make one feel a bit isolated from the others (and allows him to ENJOY the solitude)!
Any comment on Will Roger's comment - "I never met a man I didn't like?"
HaH!!
On the other hand, what could I say in this book, that does not portray development as misanthropic?  This is not the impression I want to make.
The development does not suggest complete disregard for you fellow man - only disregard for his ulterior motives - I believe in true friendship and amity between persons but I do not advocate blind devotion to and ideal (i.e. friendship).  That is a very unusual phenomena in the Earth plane.
You have mentioned before that we can advance "as slow or as fast as we choose" - when we can accept but "always as it should be."  How does "should be" and "as fast as we choose" correlate?
As for the semantics of the conversation, "as quickly or as fast" as you desire is in perfect alignment with what "should be."  Do you see my fine line of distinction in using that word - should?  It should be exactly as we choose.  That word - should - conjures up too many visions of dictates from others and that should NOT be the case.  It is as you choose.  The discussion is not simple.  The main thing you should be concerned with is that there are steps which we all must take, and the choice will change your circumstances; but not the end result.  Think about this to night...we'll talk later. 

                                CHOICES   

Surely the choices we make are important to our development in the sense one choice has desirability or an advantage over an alternate choice.
The choices will alter the circumstances in which you learn - not at all what you learn.  Your development may be 'fast' or 'slow' but eventually (you) will come to the same destination.
Is there any truth to the "Law of Retribution" which suggest you receive what you project?
To a certain extent this 'law' prevails.  However, it concerns more the 'total entity' not especially the individual 'facets.'  At times, an entity 'sends in' a martyr, or a satyr - for his own reasons - to test the feeling of the day (or era).  It is generally a futile effort and when one (entity) needs a certain lesson, he sends out the appropriate personality to experience this particular lesson.
You also say that each personality has his own evaluation of right/wrong - evil.  Is this the entities or personalities evaluation - assuming there is a distinction between entity and personality?
Yes, for the personality in a given set of circumstances or a value system, has that particular idea, concerning his/or her total entity, he may have several 'shades' of ideas about that particular distinction.  In other words, one must try on several hats - then will come the idea or decision of which fits best!
How is a specific personality produced/created?
When a child is born, (whether 'they' all realize it) there is a determination, a pact, made by all concerned to produce the environment or circumstances.  Many persons, in a state of confusion or stress say, 'why oh why has this happened to me?'  Because they chose it.  Only that!
Will the "right" or certain choices determine the speed of development?
You can eliminate a lot of repetition by choosing a clear path rather than one that is full of obstacles.
To help me understand what you're talking about explain obstacles I have chosen to repeat.
The obstacles in your are now few, but previously you had many.  Trying to make choices and decisions for others, taking their burdens/problems on you own shoulders, trying to remedy situations long past the time that any good could be accomplished.
Have I repeated any recently?
Not too many - you were going over some until it became almost comical!  
Which ones?
Choosing your direction - not letting others steer you.  Choosing enjoyment rather than entrapment.  On and on.
Would I have learned these lessons had we not met?
You'd have learned them sooner or later - perhaps not consciously until much later but isn't it nice to learn them now and be able to USE them?
I keep thinking it should be easy to realize this without being told and that I should have known better.
You are learning 'better' - it's now a matter of not REPEATING these lessons - you're learning quickly - though it may SEEM a lesson in patience.  You have to learn patience - KNOWING that your subconsciousness will effect your choice in the perfect time.  The waiting is frustrating but it is necessary to accomplish your choices and to be aware of it.  The waiting and the thought of patience is making you more aware of your lesson in patience.
In respect to our choices does each goal have a different "charge" requirement for ignition?
But of course!  As if each had a price card attached, that will be the required amount of intent to accomplish - When a loved one is ill, it is certainly more important to you than the new car you're visualizing is it not?
What is the affect on energy required to effect a choice?
Energy is never destroyed - only changing from active to passive forms and vise versa.  It is available when needed, can be stored, can be multiplied or divided, but never destroyed.
How can we use this energy to manifest our choices?
Concentration on the objectives (this may occur through meditation or, at times, in a split second, such as an emergency or danger situation).
It's interesting to become aware of the fact that our thoughts as well as our bodies utilize energy.
Yes.  Each (in a different manner, however), is used for the entity/soul/mind for a tool of development and awareness.  The human form, very basically to experience sensory stimuli.  The energy, intelligence, natural phenomenon for insight to the universal thought-energy mass/infinite mind and so on.
Is thought energy "generated" within the body?
Energy is everywhere - you have all you need - when ever you want it and you can always have more -
Do we employ various kinds of energy?
Yes - molecular - chemical - electrical - static - kinetic - thought - heat - light - on and on.
Which one is used in the manifestation of an affirmation?
Mostly thought energy, although the others just follow with your actions in those areas.
Please explain, "with your actions."
You do other things than 'affirm' - you touch some - write others down - so on.
I also have esoteric affirmations. Do these require as much energy as would a material choice?
Some more - some less -
Is energy all that is necessary to manifest a choice?
The choice and belief are the most necessary ingredients.
Do future lessons become less difficult?  I choose the ride of my future to eliminate the speed bumps.
The lessons get easier!  (The answers may be tougher - however)!  It is actually quite smooth once you're over the foundation.

CONTACT WITH SOULS   

Has the "type" of soul that inhabits the human body reached the highest levels of development or are there species of souls that will always be more developed?
We are developing (through incarnations and experiences in interim states) to become as highly developed as the 'ultimate creator!'  When you speak of a species, more highly developed - no - the same species but in more advanced levels than any of the species that you presently are aware of.  With a great deal of learning and experience we (hopefully) will progress to the more creative states in which these advanced souls are striving to advance to even higher levels.  You will not live out all of your various circumstances in one lifetime but will - through a progression of incarnations - come to KNOW reality and ultimately CREATIVITY (of the greatest perfection - YOUR OWN CREATIVITY) YOU ARE YOUR OWN CREATOR!
What are the more productive means available to us for further development?
Introspection, suggestion of recall, hypnosis, if you like, telepathy, other types of development, not just discernment of the mystical questions.
What's the most beneficial type of hypnosis?
You are in a hypnotic state many times in the day.  Begin to recognize your alpha state and you may use hypnosis for more rapid advancement.  This is only concentration of focus.  Self-hypnosis (one form of meditation) is not fearful.
On what particular thoughts do you suggest we focus?
What would you suggest?  Where does your interest lead you?  Start with the very basic notions and I assure you, the more difficult questions will come soon enough.
On what level of development, on a scale of 1 - 10 is the immortal soul?
An IMMORTAL soul, is beyond the scale - touché, friend Rod!  If you're inquiring about mortals and interim state souls the rating is about one to ten - it all depends.
Do the more developed souls still have their "lesson" on earth or is there a plane that furthers their development better elsewhere?
Some project to mortal or physical forms to educate beings that can only understand in a physical form (or tangible) but there are great masses of thought energy in all planes.  Occasionally one may pass through such a mass and this (experienced by a human mind) is the experience of great insight - intuition or rapture. 
What is the relationship of what one learns in physical, earth reincarnations and learning in other planes?
When one has learned enough to escape the limitations of physical forms, it is a pleasure to advance in the learning steps.  If one needs physical form to learn, one is not very advanced; is he?
Well, to be truthful, I'd never given it a blink of a thought!  In fact, I hadn't realized until now that a question could be fabricated on the subject.
(My son Greg, who was in on the conversation asked this question):
Regarding non-physical forms -"I was awakened recently and saw the image of a person over my bed.  I thought nothing of it until my wife, Camille, confirmed she had seen it.  What was that all about?"
There was an entity tying to make contact with you - not a very inspiring soul but at least trying to communicate.  He was as fearful of you as you were of him.
I believe you have said, "If you seek good, you receive good.  How then, did you explain this entity?  I assumed his presence was ill intended." 
The entity could not come through because there was great fear involved on both parts.  If, Greg, you had been seeking a guide at the time (and had been ready to accept the reality of a guide) the entity would have been able to come through clearly (also if he had been aware enough - not to frighten but to teach).
Greg asked, "What did the entity have to fear from me?" 
Rejection.  Dismay.  Disgust.
Greg continued, "I think I would still be frightened but I would be more apt to accept now.  What keeps other entities, other than yourself, from tying to communicate with mortals as this one did?"
It is very difficult to communicate as directly as we do here.  For most entities, this is a great enough deterrent to go about this stage of development in another way.  We all have a stage of teaching or guiding others and generally go about this in dream states or 'intuitive' flashes - hunches, etc.
Greg asked, "Why do you refer to that particular soul as, "not very inspiring?"
He was not a very evolved soul, and was in fact, a soul in transit.  He had recently passed into another plane and still trying to associate with the physical plane.
Victor, I have heard from various sources not to get involved with earth-bound souls.  Is there any reason to take this suggestion seriously?
An 'earth-bound' would be one such as the personality that visited Greg.  In a state of transition but trying to grasp at the familiar (thus 'earth-bound.')  They are correct although I do not feel you will have such encounters for your are much more developed than most in your plane and I doubt that you would be approached. 
Could you comment more on the fact you didn't think the soul was very inspiring?
The entity was in a very confused state, passing this plane but trying to hold on (being confused by 'the next steps') - trying to keep a physical contact with anyone handy so as to be able to remain in this plane.  Many times when one has just left the physical state, they are visible to others because they are in a state of flux and often cannot 'let go.'  When one has passed from the physical plane, there is a 'rest' period and a time to reflect on one's previous incarnations and to learn a bit before deciding on one's next incarnation - for some it is an extended rest time - for some an almost immediate need to return and 'do it again' (before one forgets or blurs all the memories of the recent past).   
Are you judging this entity by saying it's not very inspiring? (I'm picking on Victor because he's stated we should not judge others).
Not at all, Rod.  Just stating the facts.  The entity was not in a state (at that time) to help anyone.  He was just grasping for a hold on something familiar.  If he were to contact Greg now, or anyone else, he would be quite beneficial in some areas.  As for 'judging' this entity or any other - it is all relative.  There is always someone that can benefit from each entities learning and progress.  
What sort of communication would one generally have with and "earth-bound" soul?
Probably none - a few whimpers and perhaps some reflective sympathy but they quickly realize they must go and usually don't have any communication.
Are those "spirits" entities (whole) or facets (part) of the soul?
Generally facets of entities that have not chosen a physical incarnation but just choose to observe in a very detached capacity.  They can be very helpful and if a bit noisy at times, are usually gone in a twinkling, if they feel they have disturbed you.
Noisy?  In what way?
Little squeaks and groans.  Very seldom do they 'speak.'  Only in cases of great danger to those they are observing and then sometimes are not heard.
Have I ever heard such sounds coming from this source?
Not that you would remember - but at times a slight noise can make you very alert thus avoiding danger, etc.  These are the times.  It sounds like an 'inner' sound and may well be.
The only sound I'd like to quell is that cricket outside our window.  He seems to be excessively long lived!  (This particular cricket, if in fact it was the same one, had been screeching for a week).
If you choose to be disturbed by it, that is your choice.  If you choose to 'quell' his mating song (cruel, Rod!) take some poison to his nest.
Surely there are more females about than his chirping would indicate.
He may be choosy!
While we're on the subject of making contact...is it true that anyone can make contact on a Ouija board?
It can be done - in most cases however - other means may be more effective.  The method I suggest to most is the writing of questions and thoughts - then meditating and afterward writing thoughts that surface in meditation.  Most (entities) do not feel that form of communication (Ouija) is always meant in the most serious vein - usually just a party game for sensationalism.
What is generally discussed on a Ouija board?
The conversations are generally very frivolous but occasionally one encounters a genuine seeker of truth.  These folk are often 'picked up' by guides that continue with them in one form or another for extended periods of (as we have done)!
How is the general awareness/consciousness of mortals perceived by entities on your plane?
With great amusement!
Why?
Most are so befuddled with their own 'complexities' they cannot see past the nose upon their face.  Just look back a short time in your own life - now it is laughable - then so very acute!  Your previous life (or reasonable facsimile of) was totally hit and miss. Even so, you 'came out' better than most in your same circumstances. 
How could I have emerged better than I did?
If you had sought - earlier - and known  you were seeking 'better' - your choices were not bad (with limited knowledge) but if you knew then, what you know now, what would you have chosen?  From early training, we feel we are at the mercy of the whims of 'others.'  You know now, you are not.
You have said our communication is unusual but conversely admit most people "pick up" a communication with the Ouija board.
The Ouija board is a very common - albiet sort-lived communication.  Our communication-exchanging ideas, knowledge, thoughts is much more complex.  I sought you on the "Ouija" for I was aware of your interest in expanding you realms of thoughts.
Since you were aware of my primary interest when we first talked I'm surprised you took offense of me asking questions of the sensational nature.  I would have thought you would have KNOWN our true intentions and been less offended.
I knew but you didn't - it was still too new - too 'spooky' and the sensationalism was part of that intrigue.  I wanted to keep you on a 'progressive' track - not a bug splash then jump out without any more thought about it.
Yes.  I have explained to others when they have asked, "Why did you get into this?" that I didn't know what I was getting into.  It was all quite a delightful surprise - to say the least.
The 'surprise was that it was delightful and not terrifying as you expected it might be!!
And... if we had not used the Ouija board?
The contact would have been another way - that just seemed the most 'relaxed' and 'fun' way to do it at the time.
Why is contact on the Ouija easier than by automatic writing or in a meditative state?
That is in the attitude of the 'communicator' - Personally I feel direct contact in meditation is the easiest but many people 'hear' and feel they are talking to themselves and discount the contact.
Seldom can I attribute communication with you during meditation.
If you would relax and let it flow you would have a great running dialogue with me - however, I think it is very considerate of you (both) to include the other and record the conversations for posterity.
What is your attitude to the parapsychology teacher we heard this week when she said it is unwise to encourage the use of the Ouija board?
She is speaking of reactions in general...There is a problem with some uneducated 'souls' reaching their counterparts in the transmission and having an uncomfortable conversation (or more contact).
Do you mean "possessed?"
It has occurred from this type of contact.
Are you admitting the results from this form of a contact really are that questionable?
No, you do not have determined circumstances, as I have mentioned before, if you choose good, you will have good.  If you choose sensationalism, you will have likewise.  If you are uneducated or default in your learning, you will have contact with entities that are uneducated or devoid of the intent to learn.
What is soul possession?
Time to reminisce - the 'good old days' eh?  Possession - a generally misunderstood term - but it is the period when a mortal INVITES another facet or entity into his body (for mortal circumstances). This is generally done for very altruistic reasons - it is NOT a 'spirit' invading a mortal body while he is (OUT) astral traveling or just projecting.  It has become a trademark for the 'spooky' side of the metaphysical interest -
What reason would an entity be invited inside another's body?
To help an individual overcome a particularly difficult lesson or when the individual is the only one who could understand the circumstances - family interactions, etc.  
Want to hop inside my body and help me with my problems...HA?!  That's it - why don't you just evict me and after things are all tidy I'll move back in...?
Good try LOAFER!  NO way!  
I have wondered since we first met how it is you "see" us.  Are we a visual perception or more a mental perception?  You seem to know so precisely where the line is on the paper; where to dot the is, etc.
My perception is very concise, not necessarily in your "physical terms' but I have my own method of knowing your whereabouts - mentally and physically.  As for punctuation, you know that I am a master, Rod.
Victor, are you an entity or a part of an entity (facet)?
I am an entity.  I prefer to be known as a teaching guide.  I have many personalities - or facets - of my existence.
Do you know where they all are?
Ah, yes.  Of course.  They are like my 'children' except that they are all me.  I've 'collected' all my self and I'm beginning to graduate to other planes.  It is much easier to understand when you can transcend time and space.  We can talk about this later.

PRESENT PAST AND FUTURE   

Why does man evaluate time in terms of present, past and future?  What is the advantage of this appraisal?
Only that he can break it down to manageable parts.  The original decimation of time was begun so that some could have more control over others.  Using it as a tool - against the 'masses.'  But as always, each had a choice - they were, for the most part, duped into believing that their decisions were past, the 'leaders' were present, and a future was/is the almighty or whatever some few had decided. 
How would a man raised by a wolf pack evaluate time?
Now.
As he would have acted before the influence of control?
Feral children - or really any child - can live instinctively.  I do not mean by that, animalistically.  I mean the natural laws allow one to live in all dimensions concurrently.  One does not distinguish past, present, future. That is a learned response.
Unfortunately, my evaluation/interpretations is: time is of the essence and should be productively applied - too precious to waste.
Time is of the essence - past, present and future all combining to send one into a frenzy to accomplish - acquire - and alter.  It is the JOKE of life Rod - Time is all but it is 

NOTHING!!!

Yes, time is too precious to waste but one has to determine what is 'important' enough to 'spend' it on.  Certainly not pursuing mindless pleasures - making money - building a 'career.'  These things are a by-product of your real pursuits which are peace of mind - knowing yourself - and your environment - and learning, being aware and curious!  These are life's true pleasures.
Do you and other guides actually see/experience the "past" or learn of it from others?
Some have good enough memories to recall it in great detail - most however have to refer to 'records' in the Universal Consciousness (as sometimes called the 'akashic' records). 

WHAT IS A GUIDE? 

I'm sure I have botched it when I've attempted to describe a metaphysical guide to my friends.  How would you properly describe yourself?
Just another plane of existence.  We all know - we have several levels of consciousness - don't we??  Just as we have levels of consciousness in this plane - we have several planes in which to exist.  I am a source outside your own consciousness and am your guide and 'connection' to Universal Consciousness.  Surely 'man' is not ignorant enough to believe "this is IT."
You speak as though you are part of our consciousness, rather than a part of another entity.
I am trying to demonstrate the idea as though you are talking to others.
To begin you might ask a few questions of your audience - 'Do you understand levels of existence or planes?'  "Are you psychic?'  'Have you encountered experiences as telepathy - intuition - premonitions and so on?'  This is very common Rod, and will break down some of the initial resistance to the idea of a 'guide.'
What keeps the consciousness of entities in your plane from having greater communication with mortals?  I should think it would be common enough that the idea wouldn't be frightening.
Yes, it's a little precaution to guard against such occurrences.
Why?
Why not?
It appears to me, if our destiny is development, that we could be acquainted more with the metaphysical and less with our preconceived ideas if such contacts were more prevalent.
That is the point of having an 'earth' plane - Mortals must learn somewhere! 
Is it coincidence that we associated with you?
When one is seeking new knowledge and awareness, the means will come about (through our own wanting and needing this information).  Coincidence in essence means ironic connection of events, thus it is ironic: however, we'd have met one way or the other - sooner or later - and for better or worse.  (My humor Rod, do not take that too literally).
Are you going to be our permanent guide?
One may have the same guide through a lifetime or several in succession or several as a group - your choice!  Variety or stability.  In these planes (anyway) the way to 'grow' is to help one another!!  A good lessons for 'some' planes.
What can you tell us regarding the Catholic belief of "guardian angels?"  Are they, in essence, guides?
There is a great similarity of guides is all religions: guardian angels , guiding spirits, prophets, ghosts, etc., etc.  For all who seek, there is knowledge and wisdom to be had.
If, as you say, each mortal has a guide and yet that mortal doesn't believe in guides - what then?
Consciously they may say they do not believe but as the saying goes, "There are no atheist in foxholes."  None the less - you HAVE a guide as they have a guide - whether or not they choose to learn anything from the guide - Thusly everyone has a guide.  What IS - IS!
How would a guide teach a mortal with whom there wasn't any communication?
There is communication - not always as direct as yours but the guides are there to help - guide - instruct - answer appeals, etc.
Why can't everyone have this form of communication if they choose?
They CAN - if they CHOOSE!  (most however do not and will not)!!
Not everyone - in fact - few - will have as direct a communication as this written form.  That is why there is such stress on the recording of thought and dreams.  This will be their communication with their guides - in dreams or in meditation.  It is extremely important!
Frank's wife (a casual friend of ours) won't pursue a guide in fear of encouraging his presence and continued observations.
Hah -Hah - Hah.  It is quite a common worry but we here really do not have the inclination for voyeurism and if we do occasionally 'look in on you' believe me - it is only with your permission and for your benefit.  We do 'close our eyes' to much human folly but are usually aware of you "deepest" thoughts because they are so often on your mind and you are broadcasting very clearly to us - if not to your mortal counterparts.  (But of course we do not JUDGE so you can feel safer with the thought that we won't punish you)! 
Frank - well his little woman is terrified of the unusual so he won't pursue (and stand her incriminations).  He would have been an interesting (and interested) seeker if it were not for the influence of the wife.  She is not ready yet but if she could see that your source (me) is 100% pure GOOD and only exudes goodness and logic - she could not refute there may be another path than the one she's on.
Why don't more people accept the "guide" concept, or if nothing else, valid guidance?
They aren't looking!
Isn't this akin to the use to which a psychic, in a recent TV program, applied her "skills" to her pet?
If no one else is communicating - why not?
Why?
As you have experienced - so many bumps on the head on a brick wall tends to make one somewhat apathetic about 'spreading the word.'
But aren't you astonished by the fact that those to whom you have given advise or means to contact their own guides have expressed no continuing interest...or have totally forgotten?
Not with astonishment, for I have seen it happen many more times than this, Rod.  It is the usual pattern!!  So much for development!
What are some indications of an earnest searcher?
Some signs are willingness and perseverance (which you probably would not easily recognize in most acquaintances) and the "VIBES" which you will recognize but they are very rare so you may not come across a lot of students - The approach should be of an expensive but EASY way to begin!  That separates the diddlers from the dabblers!  The presentation should be pleasant - certainly not to the point of groveling but your remark in one of your questions, "I'm just a beginner" should be paramount in your mind - most of your students have never had any inkling of this and you must have empathy for them as I have had empathy, for you.
If I were a teacher I can sense the difficulty responding to questions that could be posed me.  For instance, if I were to make the analogy that exclusive of man, there is perfect harmony in nature.  I see difficulties answering such retorts as: "One animal eating another is what you call perfect harmony?  Even man isn't that disorderly"
Man does eat animals though - at least most do.  And nature was in perfect harmony because of it - that tack isn't really the point you are trying to make.  (That sounds as though you are espousing a UTOPIAN society which is not at all what you are trying to point out.  You are addressing the question of living happily and fulfillingly in a less than perfect scenario - get it?  Yes folk - in spite of pollution, taxes, mayhem and presidents this can be fun and fulfilling period of your existence.  Let me show you how! 
Why do some people pursue some of the obviously "kinky" approaches but would not consider developing via guides, meditation, writing down thoughts, etc? 
Non-involvement or at least non-commitment to involvement.  With the books, one can read a bit and put it down and move to another point of view and try that for a while and flit about for years on end always feeling that when they fine "it" it will smack them between the eyes and light up the lights and it will explain their existence.  When one is looking within, he may just find it and that scares most people off.  Too real!
If that's the case why were so many people attending the awareness class at the college last night?  (We had attended and adult education class on metaphysics).
Mostly curiosity, they are trying to get some information without putting forth the effort to experience for themselves what is going on about them.  It is quite a basic group and though you may acquire some new ideas, I feel there are other avenues for you to pursue.
There were some contradictions in that class.  In fact, the psychic painter seemed to be a contradiction.  She is a terrific trance painter but expressed little appreciation of her ability and less interest in her development.
I will not judge her performance except to say she should stick to her 'art' form and she is a good channel.  Perhaps the 'force' she speaks of needs a blank space in which to communicate.  Ha!
Do you refer to the canvas as the blank space?
Not particularly!
Was there a guide involved or was this an act - why is she induced to paint pictures?
She has a 'guide' and also a need to express herself which she cannot seem to do in any other manner.
My point in discussing her, is that I would like these lessons to affect more development in others, than this class affected us.
That will come in time Rod - first you must be affected and benefit before you can pass along that benefit to others.
What's you impression of the reward sheet for a cat posted in our meditation class?  (The school had mailed me a reward poster designed by a student who had lost her cat.  She wanted the students of the class to help determine the whereabouts of the cat by meditating and seeing it in the mind's eye).
I find it hard to believe some one with the initiative to take the class in the first place, would react so stupidly to the disappearance of the animal (who has probably long ago outlived his usefulness). 
You just don't have any empathy for this woman and her cat!!
I have empathy for the cat and sympathy for the woman. 
Funny.  Our attempts to explain your jokes aren't half as difficult or frustrating as explaining our experience with you.  How do you suggest we face this futility?
Knowledge is there for all who seek it.  If one is ready for development and awareness of one's self - he will pursue it in the 'right' way.  If he only wants sensationalism or a continuation of manipulation and subjectivity - he will have that also.  You are not a teacher at this point in your development.  It will come when you are prepared to deal with futility.  Rod, the greatest frustration of 'teaching' is your own learning (or lack of it)!  You will see.   You had (also) better be "prepared" for a lot of "in-depth" questions - many of which may make you doubt your own learning.  It is a difficult first step.
What is the most obvious fact that could explain that it's the consciousness and not the physical form that is meant to be developed?
The mortal body is "at the state of the art" - so to speak - nearly perfect for this plane of existence - but the very idea that people seek knowledge is a reminder that the mind - the soul - the consciousness KNOWS there is so much more.
Do you foretell teaching as a possibility for me?  (I have long since dissuaded my interest in this).
It is a possibility.  There are more productive means at your disposal, at this time.  If you wish to teach there will be much opportunity to do this at a later time.  It's not so easy to teach.  Teaching your program is not the time for it.  People are not ready to learn.  You do help people on a one on one.  Group teaching is not something you should attempt at this time.  Don't take it as a personal offense it is not meant as one.  It's just not the time.
Is being a guide and teacher as frustrating a job for you as you imply it would be for me?
Yes but 'most of us' have already had our patience primers!
Why is man's development on Earth so interrelated with other people?
Most persons can learn very much by experience and example - not especially watching others but experiencing with them the alternatives that could be.
Are certain entities (or facets) paired to specific mates to effect chosen experiences?
It is part of the 'process' and it can be facets or (whole) entities teaching; that depends on the level of the development of the mortal.
What characteristics of our facet/entity do we want to improve by having chosen you as our guide?  I assume we had a part in the choice.
Of course you had a part in choosing me - and I had a part in choosing you (two).  The main function I hope to improve is your ability to think for yourselves - asking questions, certainly but then gaining enough "basic" knowledge to reason for yourselves and enjoy the true "logic" that you will encounter - this will be much different from the "logic" you now seem to use.
Is "think for ourselves" synonymous with making our choices?
Yes but more!  It is also creativity, logic and reason.  So very different!
Are these lessons what you would call, universal; taught by all guides?
The lessons are the same but perhaps each guide uses a different approach.  Mine are rather simplistic but I have found them quite effective.

                      LESSONS OF CHOICE  

Are you going to suggest the lessons that will assist in our development?
Yes of course - many!  Do ants sleep?  When do fish meditate?  What of the Bermuda Triangle?  Is the polar cap really a frozen continent?  What happens to dead skin?  Do escalators ever pile up?  Your choice - dears!
Very funny.  I'll improve the quality of my questions.
I aim to please. 	Questions of this nature may lead to some unexpected areas of development.
Is it natural for mortals to feel consoled by their guides?  I don't find much reward just floundering about asking questions that might produce some desired results.
I do not console you - only try to make you see your own true choices and some paths to follow that may get you to the end results in the most expedient manner - that is not to say it is always the most comfortable route - but in the end - it really is YOUR CHOICE!
You will not and do not acquiesce in your choices by seeking all the advice available.  Sometimes the abundance of advice confuses persons so they would rather narrow the field and feel they have no alternatives - It is easier than seeing all - considering all and choosing!
Talking about seeing all, and in the interest of "science," can you tell us if you can/could predict our/the future?
And there it shall remain - your future is your choice - mine is my choice etc. - and most of us do not have the time or the inclination to delve into others' choices, See!  Rod, when you are in this plane - you will know all you ask now - for the time, I would like to help you along these lines, however, where there is no faith, there is no truth.  The truth is as each perceives it.  My opinion or yours or any other could be the "right" one, however, it will depend upon who is most involved in the choice - And it can change mid-stream if another stronger choice is interjected.  What I am really saying - and not harshly - only emphatically - is that each has a choice - in all matters that affect him and when he exercises his choice, "circumstances" can change (for they are only determined by our own choices)!
It is all in the interpretation of the event - good - bad - productive - destructive - Your attitude is what determines the validity of an event.  It is developmental if you realize your choices are involved - if not - it is all explanatory and may be considered rationalizing - Do you see the difference?
In other words, if what happens appears to be our choice, we can consider this developmental - if not, we can reflect on why it was not our choice.  It is your choice in either case - If you want to acknowledge that - it is developmental - if you say -'Look at what Fate has done to me' - I would consider that rationalizing.
I am sure your curiosity is overwhelming, however, to explain the 'given circumstances' would be to eliminate your free choice. It is always - ultimately - your choice.
What I am trying to do is help you to know - and be aware of - all that is about you.  At times - however - we seem to step into a groove of 'leader' and follower - I am not trying to brainwash you with my ideas or what I see as truth - I am only trying to make you aware of what you perceive as truth.  Independent - self reliant - and creative - that is my greatest lesson to you.  If you differ from my view - I am not offended - I am joyous - for this assures me you are not seeing life through my eyes - only your own.  Do you see my point?  It is a very small distinction but is so very important!
Sorry to seem devious Rod, but there is a certain awareness coming to you from within and if I easily answer all your questions - your doubts and all - it would detract from your own growing confidence. 
You are creating your own reality!  I am only helping you to see your TRUE THOUGHTS!  I am here to help where I can  - keep you on the right course and stir your interest when I can - It's a "cushy" job - all in all.
If that's the case everything we do should be prefaced by a conscious choice.
Ideally that would be the perfect choice.  However, Rod, we are a long ways yet from making all our choices and thereby having complete control over our lives.
Who then gets involved in that part of our lives we don't choose?
The choices not made are in themselves a choice.  If you choose to ignore an area and some choice is there to be made - it is made by Universal Consciousness.  In most cases, this is a good system and works generally to your advantage, but there are exceptions to every rule: and at these times, another's choice 'seems' to be inflicted upon you.
To eliminate the feeling of being "inflicted upon" it would appear the answer would be to make as many choices as possible.
We should make as many choices as we consciously realize we can make.  The benefits may be unseen for some time but there is always a benefit in making you own choice!
If a choice isn't made, are you saying subsequent events may be a surprise or even disappointing?  Somewhat like the dandelion seed that is blown around - why grieve about its destination if there was no concern of direction in the first place?
Exactly, Rod!  If there is no goal/destination/end result - the steps follow no order and therefore are disappointing, surprising and without any benefit.
This may explain why in many instances I'm reluctant to communicate with you for fear of continuing my inability to handle my own problems and determine my own destination.
For shame, Rod!  You know that we can discuss any subject and perhaps it would have lightened your load to have heard a different point of view.  Your "earthly" concerns are mine as well.  You are not incapable of making a choice but so far, incapable of KNOWING that what you have chosen - IS!  You are beginning to analyze your own thoughts very concisely these days.
There are days I wonder if I understand what a choice really is.
Yes - I believe you know what a choice is but when you make a choice you do not always believe in your choice and thus the results are as though you had not made a choice.  Do you understand the distinction?
Do you mean I don't believe my choice will/can manifest or really don't want what I have chosen?
I believe you are not quite ready to accept some of your choices - either through fear, doubt or what have you?
How do you suggest I approach the elimination of such subliminal emotions as doubt?
The negativism is only not knowing - when you see the results you have chosen - over and over - it will begin to impress you that it certainly is your choice and you know what your future is.
The first step is STOP trying so hard!  It is an idea so simple that you must first eliminate all you know - every idea you have - simple enough?  Then - meditate - deep simple relaxation.  It will come.
Does this "simple" idea produce results in the form of a revelation , like Shazammmmm$*^#!*+~! or does the idea grow and evolve so gradually one my not realize his progression?
You already 'know' the idea and it's use.  It is just so deeply buried - under all the notions - doubts - questions - that it seems elusive and 'unknown.'
Isn't it true, however, since we all need to think for ourselves, although you could provide an uplifting viewpoint, that I should be capable with your teachings, to make progress in the areas of awareness by myself?
That is true, Rod, but I do not feel our conversations are a "placebo" to your problems or questions - do you?  I have always felt that we had a free 'exchange' of views.
Here's my analogy - take a poor math student - he knows the formula but applies them only when continually coached by his professor.  Wouldn't it be more rewarding for the student if he worked out his own problems using the formula as his guideline?
That is all well and good - the conversations can then be purely social - okey?  Dear one - did you have an enjoyable 'holiday?'  How's the family?  Did you miss me while I was 'away?'  Get a new car?  Dog?
That's a good line!
I still feel I should be able to create my own consolation and to choose without the use of "props."
Rod, you do choose your own attitude - however when you barraged with negativism, there is always a possibility of some 'sinking in.'  You are much more aware than most and can more easily 'detect' the negative - the fact that it does not all  'magically' disappear in not as important as being aware of it and not accepting it in your sphere!  You have not become dependent on my advice - and you will not!  It is only meant as a helpful tool to combat the overwhelming negative odds!
Just don't give up too easily.  These conditions that have taken so very long to build up strength, cannot be dissolved in a matter of moments.  You seem to be disappointed with your progress but, please do not despair.  There is a great energy building and you have not yet reached the peak.
I have meditated on my tensions, thoughts and choices as you have suggested... perhaps I am somewhat disappointed in some areas by the ease others seem to manifest their choices.
Rod, patience please.  Please do not feel anger.  These are the exception.  You have been deceived by you thoughts for so long it is difficult to see them in this new honesty - it is quite a shock when you realize how deceiving many things in life have always been.  There are many who struggle through lifetimes without the progress that you have experienced in a very short time.  Just discern!
Choices are - you know - on two levels - the conscious(surface level) choice (looks good - sounds good - will please everyone) and the sub-consciousness (or REAL) choices - those which YOU really truly want, need, and expect, FOR YOURSELF!  So many choices are whims that float in and out of consciousness without more than that passing thought.  What may seem very important one day may seem trivial another - or something trivial once accomplished may have more significance in the after-effect of PEACE OF MIND.  The rate of progress will differ in each area.  You may be running lightening fast in one area and simply creeping in another.
Well, if I' not beginning to feel like the Six Million Dollar Man with an edge on the playing field with you at my side.  ( I made this comment with a rather sarcastic and yet doubtful attitude that many of my choices would manifest).
I certainly hope so!  The 'edge' however is not something 'added on' - it is from within - your own awareness, my dear!  Incidentally - six million is cheap! compared to the value of awareness.
It is interesting to note, that however lacking I feel in certain areas how entirely differently I interpret other areas of my experience since we've associated.  I'm less capable of being swayed; less awed; see greater plausibility and light at the end of the tunnel for greater conviction.  I know I joke a lot and am cynical and sarcastic but I do want you to realize I'm thankful for your teachings.
I am so pleased, Rod and P, to know that I have been able to awaken these feeling in you.  It is a great reward to me to be able to talk with you about such meaningful subjects and perhaps add a little different meaning to what you once believed and in so doing, alert you to possibilities which had not yet surfaced.  Our relationship has been undeniably strengthened by the trust you have placed in me, and I in you.  We shall continue to grow together.
Anyway I can brighten you day is marvelous to me!  I am so pleased that you're so interested in our 'little program.'
It may appear to be a "little program" but it's a tough one!
Yes, Rod, and if in some cases it is difficult to convey the simplicity of it all, just keep heart and remember the years of confusion and puzzlement you had.  It helps to keep up your perseverance in the face of ignorance, boredom and intolerance.
I would like to see some of our friends get as much enjoyment from contacting their guide, as we get from you.  Incidentally, your teaching would be considered one of the great "con" jobs if we could prove them false.
I understand.  It is difficult to accept 'teachings' that are so foreign to the average - normal ideas on the subject.  I can only assure you that your beliefs are the most important and to gain insight and development you must accept the 'challenge.'  It is not meant to startle you or to set you against your friends - only to stir your own deeper thoughts and when the choice must be made, to make an intelligent, informed, unbiased decision.

                                GURUS   

I saw a program on Marin County, California last week about all the "teachers," gurus, Tai Chi instructors etc., doing their bit to straighten out the lost souls of the world.  I reflected on myself writing a book about our conversations/teachings and question my own motive.
There are many motives, not the least of which is monetary.  It is a field where one does not need and official' education in any particular area - just a basic idea and a little "flim-flam."  Some, as you are motivated by the obvious need of most persons you encounter - the spectrum is as wide as the number of 'leaders and instructors.'
Would you give me your impression of three books?
Yes.
1. Psycho Cybernetics
Twenty years before its time.
2. How To Win Friends and Influence People
Be a patsy and everyone will say you're a nice guy (to walk on).
3.  I'm OK - You're OK
Ah - finally a realistic sort of book.  Much too involved for the general public to grasp - but the original thought is excellent.
I'm fascinated by your teachings but why is there so much disparity in what is taught by different guides?  I am particularly referencing books in which guides are mentioned?
As ever - each has a choice - some 'souls' (entities - guides -??) are too lazy to teach creative thoughts so they pass along such mumbo-jumbo (if indeed - they are being quoted).  There is always a question regarding the Origin of All That Is!
How would you suggest to those who read this, to regard these teachings as truth, rather than mumbo-jumbo?
The only way to 'know' is research all available information and prove to YOURSELF which is mumbo-jumbo and which is KNOWLEDGE.  You can only know from within.  It is your development which confirms or denies the possibility of any idea.                                                                                                                                                      (I had became progressively agitated by not getting definitive answers to sundry questions and this last answer only justified my disturbance.  If you are feeling similarly, consider this example to help you understand: a book - it is neither good or bad.  To prove this premise, ask a few others that have read the book about which you have formed an opinion.  Some will agree with your appraisal - others will disagree.  Who is right - who speaks the "truth?"  Whose judgment supports the proof?  Isn't it significant enough what the book meant to you?  Remember what Victor said earlier - "You don't need proof unless you are trying to tell some one else that you KNOW!"  So, get off the ego trip - you believe what you want and allow the other guy to believe what he wants - simple as that.  An argument to dissprove his appraisal may indicate  you think he's incapable to determine its value for himself.  Surely you don't believe that).
Doesn't it appear to you, as it does me, that if guides are to assist development, their stories regarding origin, past, etc., should be more similar and not stand out as a bad, C rated, Japanese, science fiction flick?
A very astute observation, my friend, but as you know - everyone has their own versions of the same 'joke' and it may sound completely foreign when told by another.  The true version is the one which you feel comfortable with and the one which explains your inner questions.
How could anyone, however, find truth in the book I just read that was written by a "psyschic" in the thirties?
Perhaps I should keep them to myself - not very complimentary.
How about the description of an "elastic, sensitive, viscous, gelatinous substance that is put forth from a mediums body that ultimately separates from the medium to materialize as another spirit - with form."  As they say, "Cut me some slack!"
A very unpleasant thought.
Is that all you can say?  This is his published "truth."  He also said he had witnesses.  It's no wonder people have difficulty formulating their own truths and particularly those regarding this subject.
I believe the author had a very weird imagination and the event he describes is the result of a childhood dread of vomiting and some nightmares combining to give him the basis for such a horrid description.
Remember, this was a best seller in the 30's...with witnesses.
The description is misleading.  A like sort of material would be the ethereal body although it is not tangible - touchable and the like.  The appearance is fluid, not mucous-like (how gauche!)  There were present in the 30's and 40's many so-called mediums.  Many were genuine channels for communication, however, the visions they attributed to spirits were illusions (for the most part).  Occasionally one could produce (he didn't - but it was in his 'act') an apparition or ghost.  This is 'in the eyes of the beholder' - not so unusual really.
Has the mass consciousness of the 80's and 90's changed?
It is beginning to be a bit better informed - Seeking answers to age-old questions and not being taken in by frauds.  The quality of investigation is much better and the results do not so 'rock the boat' as they did in earlier generations (when it was considered magic - witchcraft and the like -)
You comment on "investigations" as though they are welcomed.
The investigations are welcome, Rod.  This shows an interest to learn, if only to try to disprove, but when irrefutable evidence is found, they are then convinced.
Do you have any comments on the claims recently that the Russians are researching psychic abilities?
There is a great deal of sensationalism in most of that reporting.  They have made some remarkable advances in fields of parapsychology but also have persons from other countries.  At least they do have the sense to pursue the unknown.  No harm will come from persons who have true talents in any psychic fields.
Let's talk about more recent guide and psychic stories I've read.  One suggests that souls first entered animals and enjoyed the eating of fruits and berries.  Like blueberry pie, maybe!
Entities have no need to enter animal bodies when there is an abundance of human bodies.  Although the Earth plane in mortal body is somewhat restrictive, it is much less so than an animal skin!  You will always, have always, been a human.  For instance, you have never been a St. Bernard or a tree.
Great, but the author says that these animals, inhabited by souls, co-habited with man and produced centaurs, nymphs, mermaids, unicorns and the rest of the weird menagerie of mythology or our best nightmares. Incidentally, this book sold!
I certainly would forget such 'things' always and ever man has had a vivid imagination and has attributed to some animals, very human characteristics or visa versa - It is harmless unless treated as truth!
She reports this information having come from a "guide."
I feel that she produced a very imaginative book - it has sold quite well so do not fault her that the buyers are so shallow-thinking.  It is her choice to express her opinion.
Was it only imagination? The information was given to her by her guides?
A small part I am sure - originated elsewhere (than her subconsciousness).  Much more is embellishing upon that framework.
Another current, author's guide seems to object to her unwillingness to record his dictation by limiting the "predictions" he'll make for her.  You, conversely, say nothing; choose to say nothing, until asked...and never a prediction!
The remarks seem in part to be an explanation of writing something about which the author obviously feels uncomfortable.  I suppose the rest would be pseudo-modesty that 'she is chosen' to write such an important work.  All of 'us' begin by being do-gooders until we tire of the frustrations of trying to communicate with 'psychically' 
blind, deaf and dumb persons.  It will come to them eventually.
You mean, although this guide is on your plane, he hasn't learned to communicate with people who have a genuine interest?
He is not on my plane - only just not in an earthly plane.  He has a bit more work to get to where we are (and going)!
I'm also confused about the difference of advice/input given by different sources: praying, meditation and asking for guidance. What's the difference?
Praying - in my opinion - is asking someone or some thing else to do your learning for you.  Meditation is asking your self for any help you need - and getting it!
Is there any reason to worship Jesus and God or is development attained only as a personal endeavor?
You are one with "all that is" - you needn't worship other souls although they may have developed more than your present learning.  You will, in time, also be more advanced than most who are seeking.  Would you have them worship you?
Well, if they'd contribute to my medical insurance...  Just kidding - just kidding. 
So, how do you suggest we proceed from the present sacrificial lamb approach of religion to full enjoyment, expectation and excitement as a result of awareness?
It begins - as you began - with seeking an alternative to that 'brand.'  There is no easy way to make others aware - they must seek also and most do not have the inclination to do anything for themselves - even the simplest of seeking and enjoying!  It is a very select group you are in, Rod!
That's pretty sad.
I agree  - wholeheartedly!
You don't mind if I'm still confounded why I've not read similar teachings and yet, here I am, benefiting from your exclusive tutoring?
Many who "know" are not of the temperament to 'write' and have not the patience to go through all the 'lessons' so thoroughly as you do.  When your book is published, you'll have a lot of "Ah so's" but also a lot of livid do-gooders.
To what extent will this information help those that might otherwise have contacted a psychiatrist?
There are many that will be helped that WOULD NOT seek psychiatric advice - but if they are SEEKING - they know the answer is not in analysis (at least not that type).
Can a person have a severe psychological problem and still be aware enough to seek?
Yes - but he will soon have to admit the problem - IF HE IS TRULY SEEKING!!  You will find many many many who appear to be seeking and in fact are only 'flipping through the pages.'  BEWARE!!
Be aware or accept futility?
Beware that you do not allow yourself to be too frustrated by not being able to 'get through' to many who seem to be seeking!  They are putting up a barrier.
Please explain what you mean by barrier.
It can be very depressing when you work so hard to get people started in the right direction and they 'drop the ball.'
What's the relationship of one's psychic abilities with daily enjoyment and development?
The spectacular is what SELLS - when the practical side of this becomes more popular you will probably see it as much as 'SOAPS' on the television.
Wasn't that the attempt of the recent TV program, "Selling The Supernatural," to determine if psychic abilities really do exist? 
A 'news' show eh?  My but they were 'un-biased' weren't they?  Hah hah hah.  Typical of doctors, scientists and the other exclusive fraternities trying to protect and exalt their own stance.
60 Minutes was a little more objective.  They at least invested a good length of their show to outline the scientific results of a woman who spent six years of her life, attempting to communicate with an ape, via a computer board.
It could certainly have been easier, but it is her choice.  In that case, I would suggest that she has great difficulty with human relationships and has 'adopted' the ape in place of children in which to pour her dedication and emotion.  A pity!
It's interesting to observe how susceptible we are of being convinced by the scientific community there is such need for this type of study.
Each needs an outlet for their curiosity, emotion, dedication and this type of research grants them their needs.  It is harmless, non-involved sort of science where they can escape and yet appear to be greatly involved; emotionally and scientifically.
I'm not especially interested in apes but I am curious as to why I've not read teachings similar to yours.  Are there any?
Other than yourself?  Of course - many - and as varied as the interpretations of each one's choice!
Shouldn't these teaching be more similar?  (Is it graphic enough yet that I didn't get the point)?                                                                                                                                  No - absolutely NOT!  You have already seen several interpretations of 'the way.'  There is Silva - Tai - Yoga - Kirlian just to name a few and that is only a smattering!
Yoga and Tai aren't methods to manifest a choice are they? 
Yes - they are methods as VIABLE as any others.
Then why aren't you teaching Tai Chi?
Too strenuous for me!  Other guides may have had their own reasons - but isn't this more fun!?!  And EDUCATIONAL?
What about Silva?  He limited his teaching by only teaching introductory meditation.
Many have and many more will!!  The methods are different of course Rod - and none are as EXACTLY like yours - oh never mind - if you are such a stickler for detail let's go back to square one!  NO -  THERE IS NO ONE ELSE LIKE YOU IN THE WHOLE ENTIRE UNIVERSE AND FURTHERMORE - THERE NEVER WILL BE - OR EVER WAS.  ENOUGH SAID!?!
So what's the answer to the question that some people might derive from this; that I'm only preaching your perception?
The impact of the lessons is derived from "universal truths."  There will always be personal perceptions interjected but how else is one to learn the 'fundamentals?' There must be a personal touch or it becomes a matter of only information - not a 'lesson.'  The personal influence is what makes it 'VIABLE!!'  This lesson cannot be completely impersonal and objective or it would not be necessary anyway!
Doesn't objective mean this info should be presented without personal involvement?
Yes - but if its totally impersonal - who will be interested in learning? (from you). You are providing a framework Rod - that is all.
Sounds like Watergate all over again.  There is nobody around to explain what really happened.  If I ask a question, I'd like to know if it occurred.
Did what occur?  It?
(This was again one of those times I was not specific and continued in an inane direction).
Are you being evasive?  I meant the beginning of man's history.
I am not being evasive, Rod, I thought humorous!  "Man's history" began when he allowed himself the luxury of reflecting upon his existence and thence - "ego-drive" - preserving it for generations to come.
Very funny!  I'll learn to be very precise yet, with you.  I meant to say mans' existence.
'Man' existed long before he began recording his exploits.  The early humans were a docile peaceable group only interested in experiencing "sensory" stimulation (for evaluation and learning processes) and only much later became the animalistic, greedy, clawing creatures that so overpopulated the earth.
How did Jesus, in the midst of these attitudes, account for such awareness?
He was quite advanced in his learning and of course had experienced enough "miracles" to know it is all choice/belief/faith!
So each subsequent choice was assisted by those 'miracles' that he had already made come true?
It gives one the confidence that affirmations (like fairy tales) can 'come true.'  It is a reinforcing method.
Is that what you mean when you say he experienced enough miracles?
I do not mean 'miracles' in the sense that they are related in the Bible - such things as levitation - astral travel - faith-healing, etc. are/can be ordinary situations - if your faith/belief/choice is strong and clear!
When man chooses awareness is his path one of benevolence?
I think his choice is the development and benevolence is the by-product (usually)!
Victor, I think you said at one time for us not to expect miracles but don't you think our future experiences may appear to us as miracles?
The future, in your terms, is always miraculous, however, you will feel very comfortable knowing that this is all very natural and normal in the process.  The possibilities are so vast that I encourage the future arena - much more so than past (which can be altered but why bother? When you already have the results and present is interesting (but seems a bit 'limited' in my estimation).
P and I certainly give you credit for the "biggies."
I thank you for your kind evaluation.  In some circles I am known as a 'sunstruck' optimist (but I have always admired the connotation).

                        MORTAL'S LESSONS   

Can you, or will you tell me, what I was incarnated to learn or develop this time on earth?
Rod, there is so much to do that can improve a way of life.  Your primary interest should be to develop your own well-being-state of health and learning.  First be concerned with your comfort in thought and body.  Then you become more magnanimous.
Prior to each incarnation does the soul really intend to enjoy his life?  This doesn't seem likely as millions are born into such human depravation.  Is it possible they are unaware of choosing better?
Many choose 'less than perfect' circumstances in which to learn a particular lesson.
Isn't that being totally unaware?  
We are striving for awareness (when choosing our lessons and incarnations).
I still have the impression that the plane from which they return, would goad a more pleasing choice than millions presently make.
One would think that but all the 'interim' planes are not as advanced as you may guess - It depends entirely on the development of the entity.
Then all mortals aren't born with the same level of awareness?
Each chooses his level of 'awareness' before he makes his mortal debut.
Why would an entity choose less awareness in a subsequent incarnation than what he could have by choice?
One chooses a certain set of circumstances in which to learn a particular lesson.  If 'developing awareness' is the lesson, one must start somewhere!
If developing awareness is what's sought why not just choose more in the first place?
They choose whatever level they feel is adequate for that particular circumstance.  The awareness level is not as important as developing from that point!
What about the child that is abused, sodomized, starved, caged, etc.?  Why would any entity choose this regardless of his awareness?  It would appear this would only be a greater deterrent to future development.
The circumstances are bizarre but each does have a choice.  Some choose to be 'martyred' because of a lack in some area of confidence or competence.
What is the process for having certain parents or lovers assigned to a reincarnate?
There is always the agreement - if the child is born - in the case of abortion - or miscarriage there is last moment change of idea!  If the child is born - he (or she) is chosen by both parties and is a part of that relationship.
This is hard to buy.
You don't have to buy any of this.  What is - is!
My stepmother said she would not have chosen her father because she didn't love or like her dad (he had a bad temper) and therefore your idea isn't valid.
Although he seemed a veritable tyrant, he did instill in his children a great 'respect' if only derived from fear.  He was a very powerful man and well respected by most.  She was too young to appreciate him but in meeting him later she will enjoy the meeting.
At what stage would a reincarnate choose adopted parents?
The choice would have been made before conception - the circumstances are determined beforehand but can be altered at any time by any of the parties involved.
Why would the child choose to be born by parents other than the adopted parents - assuming they could also conceive?
There are qualities to consider from each relationship - the natural parents contribute the characteristics of physical qualities and perhaps some of the 'personality' but the adoptive parents are the determining factors of the environment.
I thought our physical attributes to be by virtue of choice!
They are always - ALSO - a choice!!
When does the soul/entity enter the body of the reincarnate?
At conception.  Before the conception there is a period of deep rest.  A few days to a few months depending on the entities need for that particular incarnation, then at conception the entity enters the 'body' (only a glimmer at that time) and while gestating acquires all the chromosomal knowledge of the parents - genes, hereditary traits - family consciousness -
On a miscarriage or abortion does the entity have similar feelings, on his return to another plane, that he would have had returning from a normal life span?
Perhaps that was a normal span for that particular incarnation - it depends on whose idea was the abortion or termination of the pregnancy.
There is present debate regarding test tube fertilization.  Do you feel authority has the right to destroy the ingredients (sperm and ovum), in spite of, a willing and consenting couple?
The doctor that destroyed was a frustrated busybody!  If the two 'parents' were willing and knowledgeable about the 'experiment' it was their choice to make - not a by-stander's.  The question involves 'whose' choice supersedes and triumphs.  It was a desperate choice for the 'parents' and 'should' have been allowed to culminate 
(in my opinion).
What would your opinion be regarding a male who indiscriminately donated his sperm to a sperm bank?
I would say he is intending to fertilize an egg and 'father' a child.  I am sure he did not 'donate' for much other reason.
How would the choice of father - mother - donor - entity be answered in this situation?
There is still the agreement - in the case such as an anonymous donor - the 'father' is still considered.  As for a couple who choose artificial insemination - it is a pact of the three plus the surrogate father.
Still - they choose all factors?
Of course!
What process occurs when a couple does not communicate directly with the entity of their choice to be their child?
The choice would have been made FIRST - then they would have made an agreement with an entity to accommodate all their choices (all 3 involved). Then they would have the child. 
Not all are conscious of the agreement but it has to be agreed before there is a birth.
Why would a soul reincarnate as a white person rather than a black or visa versa?
Each chooses a certain number of characteristics with which to cope with the given set of circumstances in which you will be incarnated. Occasionally one chooses a difficult incarnation in which to learn certain lessons, overcome certain fears - or to work out past difficulties with certain persons.  A minority incarnation lends itself to much struggle (and strengthens the soul) but I dare say I have seldom chosen extremely difficult incarnations.
Variety is the spice - ad nauseam.  The purpose, if it can be construed as purposeful is to give a somewhat different set of circumstances and therefore a choice to stay put - move up, down, or out of that particular set.
Does awareness result from the experience or the benefits of a lesson?  (This question was left intact just to give you an idea of some of the ridiculous questions I asked and my authorization of yours).
The benefits cannot be KNOWN until they have been experienced.
Isn't it possible to experience and still not know?
Yes!  Some will experience over and over and over and still not 'get it!' (Refer back to discernment).
How is it possible to know a true choice without first experiencing it?
Well if you would like to experience all those choices without first KNOWING it is a true choice - you may be pretty busy and mighty disappointed!  Rod, you may do whatever, whenever you believe.  There is not a limitation except in your own mind.  Believe and it will be done.
Why would entities choose a particular country in which to be born?  (This question arose from having spent the day in Tijuana, Mexico and experiencing some deplorable living conditions).
The choice of birth areas for many persons concerns the weather - the magnetic draw - the lifestyle - the economy - and so on -  In Mexico - although it is known for great tradition it is now also a very progressive area (except in "civil" comforts).
What is magnetic draw?
The effect of the magnetic position of an area related to polar positions.  The equatorial have the least "effect" of magnetic draw - or at least are much more balanced than extreme regions.
What's it effect on human life?
The "magnetic effect" has an influence on demeanor, features, stature and the like.
Would the effect be the same if someone moved to an area with a different magnetic draw?
The "moving" is a choice too - is it not?  As living in the city or the country - there will be a difference in the effect, of course, but the birth area is significant - that is after all - the first choice.  Many people - in fact - the majority of people in the world EXPECT 'bad times' thus they are choosing the miseries (perhaps not consciously) but persons who choose to live in the path of a hurricane or tornado corridor - or in an area where there is drought or pestilence year after year after year are not FOOLING anyone - but themselves - when they bemoan their misery!
So, I guess by that, we can take for granted the people living in the more desirable areas are more likely to make aware choices.
Yes - of course!
I know I have asked a similar question before but why would an entity choose a mentally retarded lifestyle?
Some choose to spend a time simply observing and not being obligated to communicate or 'performing' for others.  These 'mongoloids, morons, idiots,' etc., generally have a short, happy, life.
Are they more conscious of what they observe than we credit them?
Yes, they are very aware of basic and instinctive emotions and drives.  They have difficulty in expressing their awareness, however, for they have not learned the finer points of communicating as deceit, cynicism and intolerance.
With these attributes, are you sure you wouldn't rather have me think, as one of them?
Rod, to learn to live in the mortal world it is good to be aware of these things - aware does not mean that one must 'employ' them for growth and development.  Discern and learn!
What can you say regarding the millions starving to death in Africa?
As I have related previously there is always a choice.  Perhaps their circumstances may not seem ideal to you, but then again, yours may not seem ideal to them.  In another incarnation - perhaps on another simultaneous plane, they are enjoying an idyllic life.  There may be some lessons for them that you would not necessarily choose - or have already lived through - it's their choice.
Are we capable of eliminating hunger on earth?
There is an awareness in allowing others their own choice - and if you can do that - and if he can choose - then it certainly can be eliminated.  It is ultimately - though - and individual choice.  The general pattern, however, is to limit those areas where you have been taught there are limits.  If you had been taught there were limitations on sunrises - there certainly would be for you - or limitations on how many hours one could work per day or so on - you get my drift.
Rod, this is the nature of the times.  The ultimate winner is he who gets what he wants by choice not only in security but also the leisure to enjoy his time in this plane.  When the nature of the 'beast' changes, the best reward is development.  It will come to pass eventually.
In regard to the "have and have nots" why do some people with an abundance feel incapable of enjoying, when abundance had to be the choice to start with?
The abundance then is not the enjoyment of the 'product' but more challenges in what or why the product - and how to '`handle' it.
What would be the reason for such a challenge?
Not feeling a comfort in the pleasure of the acquisition but rather a challenge of feeling comfortable with the thought of keeping it!
I'll keep that in mind when I "arrive."
Please do!
Are there a set number of incarnations one must make to eliminate further incarnations?
No - each reaches his own levels in his own time.  It is not graded - only a certain amount of understanding must be reached before he can surpass the 'earthly' incarnations.  Then he goes on to the next levels.
Have any of us been exposed to similar teachings in past lives?
Exposed yes, but have not yet 'graduated' or we would not all be here as we are now.  There is always more to learn.
Are we judged or do we judge ourselves as to whether we need another reincarnation?
Do you mean by this; is there a panel (or similar) 'upstairs' to send down a sentence or penance?  No.  Each must take certain steps to attain a level of development and this can be done as slowly or as rapidly as you choose.  You 'judge' yourself but generally by others 'values.'  When you no longer compare your progress to others you will have reached a grand level of development.
Is there ever a hesitation on the entities part to be reincarnated as he must realize life, survival and death must be faced all over again?
When the decision is made and all the details ironed out, the entity has a period of deep rest and the 'mind' of the entity becomes a blank to be ready for the input of new information from the parents.
Would the recall of past incarnations assist our present development of awareness?
It won't solve the 'problems' of this life - however it may help one to know his purpose for this incarnation (although not likely).  There will be a time when you can remember EVERYTHING -                                                                                                                You mean after this one?
After each incarnation to recall what you have learned so you won't choose to repeat it.
What importance should we place in our heritage?
Your ROOTS begin in your mind - it's not the other generations but your other incarnations that are important.
So you don't regard it as an advantage to know one's heritage?
Just for curiosity - I'd say.
Does that also apply to those people with whom we've had former incarnations?
Yes - though they may be searching for an answer to their curiosities also.
I don't understand.
They may be actively seeking answers or they may be 'just curious' (as your are)?
If one were seeking what could be gained by knowing of past friends or relatives?
The development is interrelated and all contribute to each individuals progress.  With one person it won't be - with another it is a tremendous influence.  If one could know all his past family and friends he would have a clue as to his direction of development and he could probably avoid a lot of repetitions of old 'mistakes' (don't jump on that word - old lessons - shall we say)?  Is this clear now or should I draw you a picture?
Thank you very, very much - real clear...and, the best way to attain this knowledge?
Introspection - dream and thought recording - meditation - You will KNOW your 'history' and your direction.
Is this all we could be doing in our first steps toward greater awareness?
That is a pretty big order in itself, Rod.  When you have mastered these three very important steps, we shall proceed to greater heights of awareness.  Your psychic development, which is progressing well and later to some very creative areas that I'm sure will be delightful to you.
I'm starting to wonder when I'll have any time to work.  This could be a 24 hour job just keeping up with my thoughts.
Yes it is time-consuming, Rod, but how else to enjoy your development than to be conscious of it every waking - and sleeping - moment.  It is a joy!  Your growth in awareness (I do not care for the connotation attached to the "spiritual") is directly related to your desire (choice) to progress.
Is the honesty with one's self after death increased by applying these earthly lessons?
It insures one's honesty with oneself in LIFE!  That is where the need lies - after death - one cannot be dishonest - so there you go.
Is this "direction" of awareness synonymous with 'life's work?'
Your choices would - of course - include life's work - but you have more choices than WORK.
I can't help but wonder how the self imposed judging by the entity can be so truthful, so as not to cheat just a little and avoid or choose more pleasure in subsequent incarnations.
One wonders, Rod, but in fact - one can only be honest with ones' own self.  That is the irony!  You may fool the others' and even yourself (mortally) but all in all - one does come to a day of reckoning and he alone makes the final judgment.  Better to deal with it all now than to prolong and return over again!  It does get better when you make that 'affirmation.'  Next plane, please!
At death what does an entity/facet judge itself on if what he has done during his life by choice, which as I understand, is his truth which should dissuade analysis?
The entity judges himself on what he has learned - to enrich his life - to broaden his thoughts - to enable him to teach others-
Do we also judge ourselves on our ability to have been a parent - as could parents who have fostered murderers, etc?  Would such a situation effect the parents advancement to another plane?
Each judges their progress in every aspect of the incarnation.  As for parents of criminals - in most cases it is the 'fault' of the entity, although in a way the 'parents' have contributed to the atmosphere of less than perfect development.  In this way they must judge their own awareness and learning (and ability to impart learning). They alone decide if they've 'botched' it and whether they need additional learning to overcome the stigma (of crime).
While we're talking about judging - I still compare my awareness to others.  Isn't this a contradiction of my own awareness?
Your progress is 'grand' but if you had not had some comparative level, you would feel it was just mediocre.  The idea is to realize without having to continually compare, match or exceed another.  It is in your estimation where the goal stands!
Greg asked the next question.
If we don't compare ourselves to others aren't we all atomatons?
Automatons - please, (my spelling is improving also with our lessons).  No dear Greg.  I do not mean to infer that one should become an 'island.'  There is always concern (or should be) for one's fellows.  What I am speaking of is, not comparing one's life and learning with others, for there will always be others that are beyond you (above you or beneath you).  In this case one becomes either complacent or envious and that is not progress, is it?
With this lesson learned we'd be getting close to that scale of 10 for sure wouldn't we?  Ha!
In your question, you ask me to judge.  As for being immortal at that point, close; to be sure, but there are still more steps after one has shed the values of mortals.

                              IMMORTALITY   

I am still unclear as to your definition of immortality.  As I understand it to this point, we have a whole, known as the entity and facets (part of the entity) out there learning whatever lessen they choose.  If the entity and facet are part of the Universal Mind why are they spewed into space to seek development as creative as the original source of Universal Mind?  Seems like a lot of confusion and redundancy - if you ask me!
Curiosity.
Hey!  That's a ten line question and I get a one word answer?  NOT funny.
The answers are not meant to be humorous; however with my innate wit, it just can't be helped.
Then you really meant curiosity?  I would have thought the answer more complex than to create all of this for curiosities sake.
I really could not say why only that is the impression given.  To take perfection and try to make it better.  Mass consciousness is so creative that we feel it can always be better!  I agree with that - don't you?
Look, Victor, I'm still in Awareness 101 and have just been exposed to transposing Universal Consciousness for God and am still looking for a better way to butter my toast.  This degree of perfection may require too much of my imagination...or a migraine.
Universal Consciousness may be your interpretation of what some refer to as God/god/All That Is/ etc., etc., - however, if he/it/we/ were perfect - we'd have no need for 'life' - it would just BE!
Relative to my present "problems" I think I'd trade for some "perfect" and just "be" for awhile.  At least till I got bored with it!  Let's see now...ah yes, the Med, my Italian yacht cruising the Greek islands complete with peace of mind, helicopter and hoisting a "Milwaukee Best" while waiting on my French chef to serve crepes and tea.  Naawwww!  Too depressing.
Just be alive on Earth plane?  There's lots more than that without even getting close to perfection.
One argument might be that our purpose is to just be as perfect as our perception of God.
Then one would suppose one would strive for perfection not just define it and put it on the pedestal - and label it "The Impossible Dream."
Pauline and I sat discussing what was just discussed; the splintering of Universal Consciousness, the choice of lessons by each entity, repeated incarnations, that we're still unaware and still trying to reach immortality - what a perplexing circle!  Pauline had the urge to write and wrote the following:
Rod, this is the ultimate humor!
Well, if this is the ultimate humor, a good joke will soon cease to exist.  I really can't relate to life as humorous so let's get on with what happens to the entity that reaches total awareness and returns to immortality - do they relinquish individual identity?
All the individual entities (identities) are a part of Universal Consciousness but not as a gig blob of gelatin - Jell-o - each is discernible within U.C. but U.C. is not discernible as part (a separate) part of the individual.  It just IS!
You know, Victor, it wasn't too long ago you might get locked up for telling this story and presently many churches would still deny you a communion "cookie."  In fact I'm so happy it's the 1990's else I'd probably be quartered and barbecued for just thinking of repeating your story.
Do you think for an instant I care what others think?  My concern is only to communicate with a 'chosen' few - and that doesn't make me Jewish! does it?  So happy that some have come to their senses.  I have experienced lifetimes of such hypocrisy and I choose not to be involved in such again.  (I enjoy your wit, Rod, but this does bring to mind a rather serious question - many - more than you imagine - will not accept me or any of my peers - and for this - you may suffer some social 'slights').  It will be better in times to come!  Now on with lighter subjects agreed?
Will our present wisdom carry over into our next incarnation?
By all means!  Each incarnation is a step forward and the total wisdom you acquire in all your incarnations will carry you to higher levels of development, eventually to the Ultimate Of Creativity.
Have I ever known a mortal that will not be reincarnated on Earth?
You may have crossed the path of one when your were in Europe with the military service but as for relatives, close friends, etc. - No.
I thought Las Vegas had bad odds!  It must be the exception, rather than the rule, eh?
There are a majority of unaware persons on the Earth - not surprising is it?
To that degree, it's surprising.  Are there any entities that are on their first, Earth incarnation?
A few not many!  Most have completed at least one!
How many incarnations, have some of the more unaware, completed?
Hundreds!  Some people NEVER learn.
What happens to the entity left behind on another plane, while a facet of the entity is reincarnated?
The facet is usually a minor part of the entity but that depends on the development of the entity.  The entity is in a state of meditation for the interim period and just looking on (and may have several facets 'out' at one time). The learning period over, the facet comes back to the 'main' and then proceeds to the next step - either more learning - teaching or perhaps a period of reflection to know the full value of that incarnation.
Do all entities rise to a higher plane after each demise?
As they choose.  Occasionally one chooses an incarnation in which to 'slack off' but in general - one carries forward the learning of the past and continues on a higher plane.
You say the facets of the entity work our petty details, i.e., love, hate, etc.  Isn't this, somewhat, short changing mortals of a more meaningful existence having been given, via the process, a less meaningful, challenging, expressive existence, by existing only to experience some "petty details?"
Rod, you may choose as much or as little - as you care to encounter.  You are a 'whole person' unto yourself and also a part of a greater entity.  To imagine the entire entity in one realm would be to try to contain 'pop corn' in a too small popper!  There is too much of you to be in only one plane.  You are not being short-changed - only a convenience not to have to enact every emotion, every moment, of all time.  You will see soon, it is not feasible to be all things, in all times.  A bit wearing on the psyche.  (Believe me)!.
Please enlighten me to the equity of the "process."  Let's suppose I had a dead-beat facet of my entity on another plane blocking me from advancing to the next plane, while I'm sweatin' away, grindin' it out down here to become more aware.  This appears to be somewhat counter-productive to my choice of making this, hopefully my last, earth plane incarnation.
Rod, other facets can only service to help you along in your progress, another might be learning a lesson in frivolity or temperance, love or hate, any number of choices but this does not detract from your 'whole' personality; as you Rodman, or your total entity, James.  It is an easy way to work out a lot of 'petty' details that you do not wish to trouble yourself with.  It is not a deficit but truly an advantage.
Do I have a living facet of my entity in the U.S.?
At this time, no.  A fragment personality was living very recently in eastern Canada. A young woman in Ottawa.  She has now passed.
What development did she contribute to our entity?
She was a very gentle soul - seeking only truth in her own way and trying to understand her frustration at not finding another who believed as she did.  All is within - we must only seek and choose.
What is the attitude of most entities toward their earthly, facet counterparts?
Non-involvement.  Passive resistance.  Or complete horror (at their own mistakes - once again).
If I had a whole entity how would he view me?  (This is either an ego or self-development question...I can't be honest enough to admit to which I'm more interested).
Rather pleased I would guess.  Your attitudes and ideas are very advanced for one of the earthly plane.  If your were mine - I would be pleased.  (Is that a title to a popular tune?  If not, it might sell!  Ha).
Can a facet, inhabiting a mortal, ask his own entity for help?                                                    
Oh yes, certainly.  This is like the ethereal self watching over the physical form.  There are always open channels to your own 'whole' self and also guides who are always protective of you (not interfering, however, but available).
I'm not aware of ever having asked or having received help from my entity.  Have I ever done so?
Yes, many times.  It is not a conscious effort but you are continually receiving help from your entity.  The 'second wind' - last surge - sudden impulse - awareness of danger so on.
I think most mortals tend to think of themselves autonomously and now must contend with being a facet - less than the whole.                                      
Is it possible that in a subsequent incarnation, a portion of a formerly incarnated facet "A", could be a part of a newly incarnated facet "B?"
The facets are each 'whole' unto themselves - the incarnates 'take as much of the entity as they need' but it is not really as recycling.  When 'A' goes 'back' to the entity - it is no longer A but part of the entire entity - do you see?
Yes, I understand how you can state my present incarnation so clearly as Rod but I feel it refutes how definitive you can be about my entity, James.
The characteristics often repeat - you are Rod but you are also James - in perfection.
Is a fragmented entity, (having facets out) capable of immortality?
The entity can be whole within itself even while having several facets (which are whole unto themselves).  The entity cannot, however, be immortal while any of its facets are 'out.'
Has Jesus ever been reincarnated?
He had one incarnation - a portion which was concurrent with his life.  The incarnate was one of his 'followers' but also a great prophet himself - Saul - also known as Paul in modern times.  He doesn't have need for another incarnation now - and for those awaiting his 'second coming' it will be a long wait for he has no intention of going back to "that."
Then I guess there are going to be a lot of faded billboards and tattered bumper stickers!
There will also be those who use such things as threats to get the heard in formation but it is the only way they seem able to make themselves heard and they - (the evangelists) all feel they are really the Savior anyway!
You say that facets of the same entity meeting as mortals would not communicate well but would have an almost immediate attraction.  How did Jesus and Paul relate?
For Saul it was a most unusual relationship!  At first he was vehement that the 'man' should 'preach' other than the accepted intellectual doctrine of the Judeo 'religion.'   He was a zealot for his beliefs but finally after a terribly anguishing period of searching, he found the way to follow was the 'upstart's' teaching.  He then adopted the faith and renounced Judaism and then became a teacher himself!
Did he change his name when he became a teacher of the new faith?
The name change was a catharsis of sorts in a period he spent in exile in the desert for several years.  When he could accept the love emanation from Jesus, he became a new man.  Quite literally!
Explain how the Bible can be "all fiction" and be so similar to your description of the incidents.
The accounts are based on fact but have been embellished over the years to glorify the main characters (and make them larger than life and MAGIC)!  Most tales are based upon real characters and then embellished to become 'fairy tales.'  The stories handed down in folk lore are always embellished along the way.
What did Jesus actually teach/preach?
Jesus worked hard to help others become more aware.
Did he mention God?
He mentioned a better way - a mentor within each man - etc. Some of the teachings are along the same line, however, he was more interested in the sensitive than the sensual and I feel one must have the foundation before he builds a skyscraper!  Your progress is determined by your interest - as you know - some cannot absorb as quickly or as much so it must be 'tailored' for each student.  (Once the foundation is established it is much easier to determine one's rate of development).
Did he have a guide?
Oh yes.
Anyone we would recognize?
No.

                                 PRECONCEIVED IDEAS   

I still find it difficult to understand how the omnipotence of "God" can be so misrepresented by man and promulgated to such depth, within such a relatively short time.
In the era that it really took hold, James, (he started calling me James at this point) people in general were much closer to your present concept of 'God.'  When one is close to perfection - it is much easier to perceive.
What happened between that time and the present, to have this belief destroyed within man?
James, not destroyed, only hidden in the deep recesses of his mind.  The period was of great knowledge but also great excesses on the part of some mortals.  Eventually - through scare tactics and brain-washing, many believed that only a chosen few had access to this knowledge.  It was only a matter of time before practically every mortal had buried this knowledge so deeply that none knew how to go about retrieving it.  It is only when we believed we had lost it  - that we did.
I still find it incredible, even if hidden from all but a few, that these ideas don't flourish with as much vim as TV evangelism.
Too few persons care to take the responsibility for their own lives.  They would as soon, 'put in God's hands' or follow the rules and you'll go to heaven etc., etc., etc.  When people have the courage to say 'I choose this for my own reasons' there are many to jump up - fingers - a - pointing - shouting 'God is the only one who has a choice' 
and so on.  It is sad but true that very few have the courage to believe and do as they choose.
I can understand how the idea of responsibility could be lacking with people but why is it some people never do anything for themselves.  You made mention to me one day, "...and you even bought yourself something."
Most persons do not believe they have a choice in any matters of their lives, including a small reward for oneself occasionally!  The trend is to deny oneself - all but the most necessary - and then bitterly reflect on the fact that you never 'have' anything.  Actually that is akin to telling yourself - you are not worthy - therefore you do not 'have.'
Why haven't the few who know the process, exposed it? They can't all have chosen to keep it a secret.
It is no secret but very easy for the 'general populace' to go on with the momentum of the mobs.  The few who feel as we do, are labeled wierdos - cultists - magic-makers - and the like.  You have noticed the general vein of acceptance of your ideas.  
Was it manipulation of man, by a select few, that reversed man's former awareness?
A few took advantage of the way 'man' chose to be manipulated.
Who were some of the few that had that much clout in history?
The ones that were well known were long after those that had clout.

                                  EARTH    

Speaking of the past, where did entities get similar training before earth was available as a playing field?
Consciousness, before taking forms as entities on earth and other planets, existed as a great thought - energy mass and did in fact create this planet and many other spaces in which to operate.  Before that time, who knows what or where creativity was created.  It is an interesting question that I do not feel qualified to answer.  There are other planets - 'training grounds, ' places' (spaces) where one can be reincarnated and experience the 'mortal' life - however, Earth is unique in its (present) pressures - some very strange lessons to be learned here.  Life forms as you know them are very limited in this plane.  In other planes, there are some (forms) many more advanced than your present one.  In some 'higher' planes, entities do not take human forms, generally remaining in an energy, thought form as it is less limiting to their pursuits, but very similar 'emotions' - needs - responses.                                                                                                           What pressures are you referring to on Earth?
The pressure of noise pollution - air pollution - food pollution - water pollution - and so on.  I do not know why entities would create such an atmosphere in the name of development - but so much for the 'choice.'
Why was Earth created so long after the creation of souls?  Surely not just to provide a lesson in toxic waste, land-fill and forestry management.
No - not expressly for pollution but for some 'stress' lessons that are not prevalent in any other planet.  The atmospheric pressure - along with many other conditions makes it essential for all to co-operate in the delicate balance of its survival - this is more a 'testing ground' for patience - survival under pressure - so on - than many other planes.
If cooperation isn't attained...is it the end of the world?
Just a figure of speech - you know it won't end so quickly - there will always be a 'solution' as the end draws near - a savior - a Superman - or Wonder Woman - what ever is needed, will be created.
Are any of the earth planets inhabited by entities?
Yes a few - not for incarnations such as human forms but other less dense forms.
Which planets?
The names are not familiar to you - Arion, Nepithe - so on.
Victor, what I meant was Earth planets like Saturn, Mars, etc.
No - not the immediate solar system.
If man were to destroy himself through nuclear war how would that effect entities, such as yourself?
There would be no effect except as in my relationships with mortals (and if they were eliminated - that would be that).  Incidentally, he has too much ego to destroy himself - threats yes!  But never fulfilled.
If Earthly mortals were to destroy themselves, how might another mortal, without procreation available, be incarnated on this planet?
If man destroyed the earth, some entities would be 'sent in' to rebuild it and start again the propagation of humans.  It would not be long before he was again shouting threats at his neighbors. 
Why do you say that?  Does man have a violent nature and lust for war?
Man is by nature very peaceful and passive - the reason he 'wars' is that he feels repressed by his environment (man made).
Will Earth ever become a dispensable training ground as would a sand box be to a PhD in psychiatry?  Hummm...on second thought, make that a captain of a sail boat!
Perhaps someday - far in the 'future' - meanwhile this seems to be the best 'place' to learn the basic lessons.
Are there any planes that support a lower form of development than Earth?
Yes, the most basic forms are now existing in some planes (primarily for experimentation of their responses).
Are entities involved - do they take form?  Is it a physical plane?
It is a physical plane - and very isolated in the galaxy.  The experimentation involves the entities curiosity about certain life forms.
What response is the entity curious?
The response (of the lower forms) is the object of the curiosity of the entities.  The 'response' is 'will to survive' - very basic.
Does the entity have form?
It may or may not - in most cases - not - for it is primarily 'observing' not involved in any interaction.
Is the lower form physical?
Yes.  I suppose one could call it a physical form - similar to an amoebae but not even cellular.
How large?
Small!
Relative to a blimp or an amoebae?  I know, basic eh?
Smaller than either!  So small you cannot discern it - OK?
To recapitulate, this is the picture that I have formed: somewhere isolated in the foremost reaches of all galaxies are some entities - some with and some without physical forms observing and amoebae-like - non-cellular form, too small to discern - yet from which is derived and experiment of the lower forms response... all for the entities curiosity.  I must say, if I got any of this correct I'd rather be down here with Donald Duck and have you watch my response to him!
There are spaces for 'personalities' of every persuasion in the universe.  You 'do your thing' - they do theirs - enough said?
No!  Let's not leave this subject hanging.  Do I have it correct so far?  If so, what do the lower forms respond to?
You have it right.  The response is to survival instincts and challenges.  They seem to respond to only psychic stimuli - almost as though these were thoughts in a physical form (No - I am not giving you teasers - this is about all there is to it).
Do the entities provide the psychic stimuli and observe the response of the lower life form?
Yes.
Have any of us progressed from that plane to this plane?
No - no chance.
Why not?
They are in a certain level of development (also) and do not slip from plane to plane (at least not until they have completed that level and several more to progress to this one).
Are there planes, lower in terms of development, than the forms we have just discussed?
Yes, several!
How basic does it get?
Very!
I.E.?
Some lower planes do not communicate - live only by instinct and cannot discern.  They are as basic as a 'shark' - muscle serving muscle.  Some do not even have form but also do not have thought - as a blob of jelly - pulsing but truly instinctual.
Have all entities started at the bottom?  How can something develop from such an ignorant, basic and unaware position?
I suppose all started at the most basic levels even though I cannot recall being so ignorant.  In hopes of perfection the "ultimate creator" has equipped all entities with a very basic instinct but also the seeds of greatness!  We could all be perfect.

                            SENSUAL STIMULI   

You have mentioned several times that entities on other planes do not have physical form.  What is the purpose of mortals association with physical form on this plane - Earth?
The purpose on earth is to experience sensory stimuli but not just for stimulation.  It is also to make you aware that there are 'things' beyond the realm of those you can see, feel, touch, taste, etc.  The next step of course would be emotions as love, hate, empathy, envy, sorrow, joy, doubt, confidence and on and on.
Sensual: relating to or consisting in the gratification of the senses, etc.  Doesn't sound like a "developmental" endeavor to me.  Sounds like more of what to expect in Sodom and Gomorrah...experience gratification.
The purpose of experiencing sensually is to familiarize yourself with the 'instinctual' senses - then you will be able to discern the sensitivity of the 'higher' senses as 'emotions.'  It is mentally stimulating as opposed to physically -  Believe me - it is NOT a waste of time.  It is the basis of KNOWING!!
Why are mans' senses limited, resulting in limits to his perception?
The only limitations are those you allow.  There is no 'outside' limit to perception.
"Outside?"
I mean other than your own limitations (that you allow) there are NONE.
Do you find that in spite of being told we don't have limits most mortals find the idea far fetched?
Yes, I see this reaction in most mortals; however, there are some cultures that do not limit the individual, and even a few - all too few - persons in your 'civilized' group that have this type of environment in which to grow.  
I do hope you will keep this in mind when defining to your students the ideas of the 'mortal world.'
How do we of the "incorrectly trained culture" break through the limitations of our environment and teachings?
It is all part of the process and you are well on your way to even such feats as pain-control, levitation - astral travel - physical manifestations of mind powers as healing - moving inanimate objects and so on.  It is not all that incredible.  The real barrier always seems to be 'the first step' -- That is the most important and you have taken that.  I am counting upon you to finish your journey for your will experience a joy that is inexplicable in mortal terms.
What does one actually learn from sensuality?
One learns to experience sensually - thereby heightening the physical senses. When one has learned the extent of the physical senses - one may begin to experience sensitivity - the esoteric senses.  From there we can strive for immortality!
Beside sensuality, what are man's other instinctive drives?
The other instincts are survival and procreation - however they too fit nicely in the sensual category.
How is man's sensitivity employed?
After his sensual nature is satisfied - he may experience sensitivity.
If procreation is instinctive why are so many couples choosing against it?
They choose on the basis of money - time - space - and so on - not sensually!
What's the result of choosing to ignore one's natural instincts?
Your instincts are natural - if you choose to ignore your instincts, you choose to ignore yourself. If - by 'animal instincts' your are inferring your sensuality or SEXUALITY - you are denying your very nature.
Can a person be fulfilled by only following his instincts?
The instincts are very fulfilling sensually - but the very point of experiencing sensually is the building of a foundation for sensitivity.
So far, if I interpret what you're saying correctly, we haven't yet experienced sensitivity.  If  I'm correct how would you classify our experience of love?
This thought could be 'rather' involved so for the moment we will say 'love' is sensitive and one must have experienced sensually before one can be sensitive.  We'll get into the real discussion later and understand it but for now it probably shouldn't be discussed.  It is not easily comprehended without the foundation -  First things first.
I can already hear the screaming, "I'm very sensitive to my daughter or husband.  Who is this guy?!"
The idea of developing first sensually is to enhance sensitivity.  It is a first step - that is all!
I'm getting confused with how the lessons of love, hate, empathy, envy, sorrow, etc., correlate with the main objective of living on Earth, which you say is to be sensual.
The lessons of sensual stimuli are the basis for knowing yourself - first sensually and when those senses are 'aware' of all the possible sensations - we move on to sensitivity - that is knowing with senses other than physical (sensory).  How can you know if it is sensitive unless you know it is beyond the sensory, etc., etc.  The ideas is: in this mortal life the body is designed to experience sensually.  When you have an awareness of the scope of sensual stimuli - you can then distinguish the sensory from the sensitive.
You say, we should experience one so we can recognize the other.  This translates, at least to me, that I can't as yet recognize or experience sensitivity.  What would you call the ingredients of hate, anger, emotion, pity, etc., if not sensitivity?
It is an experience in the 'earth plane,' however, one cannot consciously choose to experience sensitivity (in most cases - of course there are exceptions).  If one chooses happiness, he calls upon a recollection of past experiences that produced 'a happy feeling.'  It involves the senses first - then the euphoria associated.  It is - in most cases - a learned response.  On the other hand when one experiences sensitivity consciously it is generally from another plane than the mortal - and more often than not - it is via a guide or contact with Universal Consciousness.
Victor, this is analogous to you telling me, "Rod, during all these years you really haven't been sensitive about anything.  You depicted it via sensuality."  What can be said to other's who feel as I - that they haven't experienced sensitivity?
They can experience it but they do not (yet) consciously recognize the difference ie: alphabet and numbers or first grade reading.  Seems useless now but you must have that foundation on which to build your present skills (that is - more advanced skills). 
It all begins with the primary senses.  The first five!  When these are developed fully and consciously, he can determine the next level (sensitivity).
I can't understand the relationship between our physical/sensual and sensitive/knowing.
The sensual must come first.  The knowing comes with tactile experience in sensual stimuli - then proceeding to sensitive - then to KNOWING!  It's like this book James - you must build the foundation before you build the skyscraper!
Why does the process enable man to experience sensitivity (if in fact we do experience it) without the foundation of sensual stimuli?
How do you KNOW it is sensitive if you don't know whether it is sensual?  You can put labels on things all day long but if you have never tasted saffron - you wouldn't know it from hemlock.  Do you see?
So, the beginning lessons of man's sensitivity are in this plane?
Yes - if he can distinguish if from sensuality.  He may not do much with it in this plane - but it is available.
When you say, "do much with it," do you imply application or experience?
Man doesn't understand it - so he fears it!
He fears love, joy, expectation?
In general!  Yes!!
Don't expectations\choices sometimes get thwarted over concern of "how" it may not get accomplished i.e, lack of education,  money, experience or conflict with others?
Yes of course!  Trivials such as that interfere with all of man's loftier goals.
Any suggestions (and include me in on this answer) as to how cash flow can be considered a triviality?
When man can put aside such concerns he will enjoy a happier existence.  Just try to portray it as a renewable source.
So concerns are pitted against desires and subsequently dismissed as too difficult?
Hh huh!  It's a 'logical' rationale.  Everyone says so - so it must be!
Is lust a form of sensuality or different from any other expenditure of time or emotion?
No different really - perhaps as enjoyable but equally as NON-DEVELOPMENTAL (as some other inane entertainments).
Non-developmental?  I thought mortal life was designed to experience sensual stimuli.  Now, do we have to define which ones?
The purpose is DEVELOPMENT!  not just passing time - although that is not especially BAD - only time-wasting.
I don't quite understand.  We're supposed to experience - yet we could be wasting our time?
The sensual should be experienced - not especially "wallowed-in" - do you see?  There is enough DEVELOPMENTAL SENSUAL STIMULI to experience without continually repeating a pattern that does not educate - only entertains.
Give me some suggestions of sensual experiences you wouldn't classify as time wasting or demeaning.
There are plenty if you choose to keep on enjoying them - the sensual experiences! The first glow of morning - how about a massage -  flowers - an Epicurean delight - when did you last paint or create with your hands?  Sing in the shower?  The exhilaration of accomplishing something new - again and again! travel - KNOWING!  Too many things are slipping by unnoticed - do you see my idea?
Lust is projected in so many ways today that it's becoming acceptable.  (I didn't mean this in the sense of the inveterate prude.  I just meant to emphasize that our focus for meaningful endeavors hasn't been taught as a purposeful pursuit and lewdness flourishes).
It is prevalent but not productive - therefore not acceptable - It is demeaning - though I am sure, at times, quite pleasant to observe such 'blatant' invitations.
Sounds like we should compile a list of non-productive sensualities to determine what's left.
There is much that is sensory without being non-productive (also sensual without being demeaning and idiotic).
What about drugs - aren't they sensory stimuli?
They can be used as well as other stimuli - your choice as usual!!  They are more 'sensational' than sensory.
Sounds like we've gone in a circle without knowing how.  We need to be aware enough, without the required awareness, to know what sensory experience is developmental.  This is like a person taking a graduate course, expecting comprehension, when his level of awareness should have kept him in grade school.
It's something to think over - and over - and over!
Sailing is a sensual stimuli and it only entertains.
You are always learning on a ship - that is also MEDITATION TIME!
I think that is cutting the definition a little thin!

                                               CHOICE      

You've mentioned choice a lot.  Isn't every choice other than the basic survival requirements such as water, food and shelter considered an excess?
The three are survival needs but survival also includes warmth (or affection - contact - whatever) and sensitivity (that is - physical sense).
Now we've established we have physical and psychological needs.  Are these needs the basis for our lessons in sensuality?
The very basic needs are taken for granted by choice to live in this physical plane.  We are working more on the level of choices beyond survival.  I presume you choose more than just survival??
Just my way of determining your definition of greed.
Greed is expecting to deny others their choices.  You will always have enough or abundance - if you choose - there is plenty for everyone else.  Believe it!
Now we get back to the question of why don't we choose more for ourselves than just survival?
Sympathy, empathy, ad infinitum!
In other words, emotionally?
For emotional gratification.
What's the best approach to rid oneself of such emotions?
Just KNOWING that they are there is enough to see if they are productive or destructive.
Then a choice is a manifestation of need.  What if I say to myself, 'They're not really needed - I can get along without them?'
You don't NEED them???  James - DO NOT EVER say such a thing again!  They are necessities!!
Why do/should I have a greater need for material goods than an African tribesman?
You don't have more need for them - only you know what's available for your choice!
They may be necessities for my happiness, fun, enjoyment and pleasure but not for survival.
Who said anything about survival??
Was that a Freudian slip or subliminal "bubble" surfacing?
I guess!  Now let's 'burp' all of those kind of thoughts and get back on track.
To make it simple then, it is need, and desire that is important?
That's what gives your affirmations the 'power' to culminate - makes your 'sub' aware of your TRUE THOUGHTS!
I sense a contradiction here.  I have the feeling mans self worth doesn't equal his ego so how can he make such choices?  I sense this because it is how I perceive certain choices.  In honesty, I'd classify quite a few as hope.
The "ego" is trying to justify his position in the world - the WORTH is his real knowing of himself.
The basis for ones worthiness runs the gamut and is so elusive.  It's so much easier to evaluate other's worth.  Ha!
Of course!  Yours may not be so obvious but it's there - dig for it!!
What would it be I'm looking for?
Confidence - reassurance - mostly just reinforcement of your evaluation of yourself and your ideas!
Like asking you about something?
Asking me and then asking someone else.
Should I not cross-check or get a second opinion from another source?
The idea is to become completely self-reliant!  No checking or balancing with any one!  This self-confidence is quite a change too.  You will no longer feel you have to JUSTIFY to others, your mode of life.
If it's that simple how did the saying, "You're to self conscious," originate?
Probably with the same folks who 'propagate' such theories as: the meek shall inherit the earth - turn your other cheek - majority rules - government is good for all - etc., etc.
I suppose these saying do eventually become accepted by our subconscious and ultimately affect our beliefs.
Yes - there are too many to list but everything you hear or say - should be NOTICED and filtered to eliminate any negative implications.  You are already beginning but you must make a CONCERTED effort.
How would you suggest one proceed in developing awareness since it's largely a matter of self confidence/esteem?
Begin with closing up all the 'old bogie men' and throw away the key.  Your life is NOW - yesterday is important only if you give it importance. The old nagging doubts too.  If you make a past "faux pas" more important than a genuine accomplishment of love or awareness - you alone have the power to add or detract from your self-image.
Do the choices we make, convey something to us about ourselves and relate to our ultimate goal in life?
It may or may not in either question.  You will KNOW when you have discerned a true thought - and eventually your goals will be based on true thoughts (true choices).
If I can 'lend a hand' I would love to have you choose only those things that seem totally out of bounds - now.
James, you may do whatever, whenever you believe.  There is not a limitation except in your own mind.  Believe and it will be done.  You do not yet feel WORTHY!  When you do you will enjoy without limit.
Your trying to tell me nicely that my feelings of self-worth are determining my goals.
Your choices are an interpretation of your own worth.  Are you now feeling you have had your just due?  That you deserve only what you've got?  You eliminate what you cannot conceive as being your own (are you worthy? etc).  
Where do you perceive 'bounds'?  What you perceive - you achieve.  Through honest searching questions you have come to your own conclusions.  I cannot predict or change your ideas and reactions.  I can only give you information so that you may choose your own results.  There is no reason, however, not to feel confident  - is there?  Have you any doubts that you want - need - expect and believe in your own choice?  The past successes certainly add to confidence but are not NECESSARY to operate out of strength in the area.  Try a little "letting go!!" It does wonders for you!
You haven't placed much importance on acquiring much of our development from realizing our past incarnations or heritage.  Would it be beneficial for us to be aware of this?
I feel there is a valid lesson in knowing the origin of "All That Is" - not in lieu of other lessons but in addition.  However, at this time, we have more pertinent lessons.
I.E.?
I suggested earlier that you should introduce subjects that are of interest to you, at least until we finish with the more basic lessons.  I.E. indeed!
Well, I never...even my first grade school teacher gave us a study outline!
That was of her interest! (and within her limitations)! If you have no further questions at this time.
I always have more questions, `ol Pal.  Don't try to sneak out on me! 
Did creation design man to manifest these emotional traumas of self-worth, ego, confidence, guilt, doubt, etc?
That is strictly 'a mortal' innovation!  The human body was designed for perfection - it is only the mind that needed a scapegoat!
Why has the human body taken its present form?  Was its design influenced by earthly or some galactic civilizations?
The human form is a convenient (size, weight, density, electrical and chemical make-up) form for the entity to experience sensual, physical responses.  It is not possible to experience them in strictly mental, thought processes although this is where they originate.  For instance, female animals do not experience orgasm as the female human does.  Much of this sensation has evolved mentally and is much more exaggerated than the animal response to the same stimuli.  The human form did originate from thought masses, but not some other (advanced) group.
Was Darwin correct or on the right track?
Yes and no.  The form has evolved and changed from the 'original' human form but the form did not begin from a cell reproducing then becoming the amoebae etc., etc.
Is that why they can't find the links connecting the evolution of man?
There are no 'links.'  Man's form has adapted to his environment and needs but the form actually began in the thought mass and was literally placed upon 'earth' as a finished product. That is it. Simple?  Yes - if you can understand the basic creativity of the 'entity' (mind - soul - whatever  nomenclature you prefer).
Real simple!  I have a difficult enough time envisioning anything materializing much less a human body.  I've always had an easier time accepting the evolution of the ammonia to the amoebae, etc. process.  So, you're saying Peking and Neanderthal were not the earlier form of the present form?
They were a form that was useful at the time.  The evolution is not the physical form.  It is the thought mass and it is ever evolving and growing.
I'm off track with this evolution subject.  Interesting but since I can't cover all subjects simultaneously let's get back to man's sensuality and that none of his experiences can be described as sensitive.
None that you experience presently.  You will know some but it will (have a precedent).
Your statement produces a strange feeling in that all my experiences are only sensual.  I find it difficult to  classify what I perceive as love or the thrill I get from certain endeavors as purely sensual.
The euphoria of joy and mirth is not sensual but it does spur sensual expressions - the blood quickens - the heart lightens and you feel light-headed.  This is sensual - but the euphoria is sensitive.
So it would be correct to say one area I experience, that is not sensual, is euphoria?
Yes - that could be NON-SENSUAL - however, it does trigger sensual expression.
Are cloistered nuns, in that they don't experience, what I would regard as total sensual stimuli, retarding their development?
"Cloistering" has nothing to do with experience - although I do understand your direction of questions. In many such people - cloistered religious orders, some artists and students etc., can gain this experience only vicariously and not 'first-hand.'  The fact remains, all persons (entities - if you will) must, through some means, develop to the same point before going on to new plateaus.  The reasoning for this is difficult for some to grasp.  It cannot be explained in 'logical' terms.
Another question on the tangent comes to mind.  If a reincarnate knows his subsequent earthly lesson, what is the purpose of having to learn it in human form?
As I mentioned, it cannot be explained with any logic; however, it must be. There is a logical order to development and we all must make all the steps.  What is - is!
Sounds like a lot to do in one life time beside coping with all the earthly concerns.
You are making great strides, James - we shall certainly try, won't we?
We!  You sound like a combination of a nurse and an EST counselor...ha ha.  I know the learning that faces me and at times I'd just as soon reflect on flossing with a Weed-Eater.
Hah!??  What's happened to Choice /Belief /Reality /Creativity /Logic and Reason?  Experience can be handled by a dog -
Now there's a question.  I'm not going to touch it!
Do our experiences have anything to do with our knowing?
Yes - it has a part in KNOWING but the other facets are much more important - for what is experience except another name for 'end results.'
Does knowing have anything to do with our thoughts?
Thought can demonstrate KNOWING - it can also fill up the six inches between your ears.
Well, a dog can't experience, if it can't think.
Wrong!  Dogs and other animals (including man) can experience sensually - that takes NO thought whatsoever.  (Although it can be a thoughtful experience).
Let me get this straight.  So, what we're after here is a purposeful experience via thought as a result of choice /belief etc., with a satisfactory end result.  Right?
That just about wraps it up and ties the bow!
This could be a tough lesson to teach, knowing all the time the empathy required to watch one go through the bumps and grinds.  It appears to me it could be pretty demoralizing to continually tell someone he's were he's at and experiences only what he does because it's his choice.  Particularly after the "poor guy" spent his whole life so desperately trying to experience and have otherwise...and all the while, to make it worse, have his wife gnawing on his case 'cause the kid's tennis shoes are shot.'
The point is James - either they realize the choice is theirs alone or it will be construed as FATE!  They can certainly change the original results (though it too is their choice) if they KNOW they HAVE a choice.  As for trying, they expected to fail - to enjoy the misery of "look how hard I try and nothing ever works for me."  Choices - when they do make it - is the strongest influence.
The point is better just stated firmly and though they may be confused and confounded it has to be said and allowed to sink in.  No empathy can teach them that lesson.  It's hard to remain objective but there it is.  You'll get through it unscathed - they will too.
Sounds a little brutal if you ask me.
Assuming this blow can be accepted, what's the next step?
The next step we are working on is motive.  Seeing the physical, tangible, solid objects, then experiencing the emotional senses attached to those objects and then discerning and learning the reason for such emotional attachment.  Do you see the steps?
Maybe not as developmentally as I should but I don't have any problem embracing an attachment in Lear jets or Rolls Royce's.  How do you reflect on my emotional attachment to these things or mortals interest in materialism?
There are many examples all around you - a dog that is interested in nothing more than its daily food and chasing a squirrel occasionally - a bird eats his weight every day - so much for the survival instincts.  Materialism goes one step beyond this and then the quest for spirit or  soul --  It is the order of the Universe -- When one reaches beyond these meager indulgences - then he may begin to CREATE - that is the purpose of all this - in the final accounting.
In this scheme of things, what's important to you, Victor?
You are - Pauline - a few others but not much else!  The only things that last are not the tangibles - only love and development.
But surely, you must include all others with the same developmental interest?
No, only if I choose to.  The development of all others is their own choice and I am sure their love in life.
What is the next step?
The next step (after motive) is discernment (not judging) but weighing facts and learning to see the whole picture not just fragments of a picture.
Where does discernment conform with interest in material things?
The material things are still a part of your life on this plane.  Because you can move into other planes does not lessen the need on this plane for physical necessities and also comfort objects.  Material goods will give you much peace of mind - much confidence in your abilities - and much comfort in which to pursue those areas of learning which you are following - I do not think it is ego-oriented - just sensible to have what you want  - when you want it!
In your plane, is there anything of the "material" nature that you enjoy?
Whatever I please at the moment - it is easier, however, to enjoy them there than to re-create them here.  Do you see?  I take holidays from the plane I am in now - enjoy other levels -
What do you generally seek on other planes that could provide you a material satisfaction?
Mostly sentimental satisfaction - a lovely lake shimmering in the sunset - fields of green waving grass - snow against a window pane.
Do you have companionship with entities on your plane?
Ah yes - but none that I enjoy nearly as much - mostly teachers - researchers and 'know it alls.'
Know it alls?
Ah yes!  They have been in so many planes they sound like flight controllers!  Actually quite learned, but a bit overbearing (in my humble opinion).
When does genuine development start if there aren't any less know it alls on your plane?
The 'know it alls' on my plane are a very small group - many I have known here are much further along the ladder than I or many of your guides - they are mainly here as 'counselors' (helping us to get where they are)!
Are these entities lacking the awareness that would require additional earthly reincarnations?
No - they will soon move 'up' to other planes but in the meanwhile are like old professors - sitting around - 'jawing' with each other about "what is."
Have you ever been on a plane of higher development than Earth?
Never on a plane where I've learned as much as on Earth.  In my present state - I am much more exposed to 'knowledge and learning' but it is more practical to learn by doing.
Have you the interest or capability on your plane to contact a guide from a higher plane, as we have you?
I am always in contact with my guides.
Is he on a higher plane than one might expect to progress to from earth plane?
Depends on the level of development of the 'entity' (usually - only a facet is incarnated on Earth).  Some go from Earth to a 'mezzanine' - some go directly to the penthouse!
In respect to the various levels, where would the entity be while his facets are being developed on, say, earth plane?
Entities are like puppeteers - sitting on a platform watching the array of their 'little people' dance around upon various stages - when they ('the little people') have learned all the tricks they go (with the puppeteer) to Carnegie Hall.
A most vivid description.  Is being a guide one of the steps of development to escape future incarnations?
When you have learned all your lessons in that plane - you move "up" to the next and the next - both of which are still 'learning' steps - then you graduate to teaching others in 'lower' planes (I only use the terms upper or lower for distinction - actually there is no difference in strata or time).  Eventually when you have taught all you have learned, you move to yet another plane to perfect your lessons - then you may begin to create -----
How do you contend with our basic and tedious questioning when you are on a plane of such vastness and awareness?
Regarding the plane, we are all in simultaneous planes of past, present, future and variations of these "phases."  It is not as difficult as it may seem because I do not encounter difficulties with variations of time - only explaining them to my 'limited view' friends.
In any case, I find your restraint "out of this world."
Cute!  Really, James, the patience in this plane is UNENDING!! Thank heaven!!
Let's see how patient you are with your limited view friends.  Let's return to the subject of evolution, that we left hanging.  Does the physical form (body) precede the environment of the future thus making the future or is it redesigned to fit a subsequent environment?
The body "adapts" to fit man's "vision" of the future (for man does create his own future).
In what direction is the physical form headed in weight, size, etc., in the future?
The 'future' model will be more compact - lighter and less dense.  Much more ethereal less physical.
And yet you say the changes will be undetectable?
The changes are very subtle and you would not notice as each generation has a slightly different design.
That's were we started this conversation.  Isn't this evolution?
Along the same lines - evidently - except that each is totally created "from scratch" in the universal consciousness.  There is no "carryover" so to speak - as evolvement.
I still can't understand why in spite of such subtle changes a connection can't be accounted for between the changes of the physical form.
Because each is one separate era - it does not "grow" from a "basic" model into the "deluxe" - it is a separate design - unique in its make-up.
Have the entities that inhabit present earth forms inhabited the bodies of the Cro-Magnon - Neanderthal life forms?  Will you read our thoughts and explain why we still interpret this as evolution?
The strict definition of evolution is change for adaptation.  The redesigning of each model is improving on an idea - by each having the choice of separate parts - thoughts - genes - blood - bones - etc., and making up a "package" he feels is appropriate for the 'future' he has chosen.
Have entities that presently inhabit the bodies of present day man ever inhabited the forms of the Cromagnon and Neanderthal?
The entities have occupied the "model" of bodies that was apropos for the time.  For instance before man thought" of clothing he solved the problem of warmth by having a hair-covered body.  There was not an evolution from those bodies but in each era "man" created an appropriate model.
Why did man conceive a more appropriate body.  What induced the change?
Entities, as individuals, each have an opinion of what is 'correct' or 'appropriate.'
Are you saying mass consciousness makes improvement changes on the Earth plane?
It does change - perhaps for the "better."
Why did mass consciousness choose the present human form over previous models that seemed ample?
As you have just discussed among yourselves - the latter is more streamlined - lighter, more appropriate for this mechanized era.
Since mass consciousness chooses our present and future form can it be assumed all events of man are created by someone's choice?
Yes.  James, I do not understand this 'line of question.'  Are you heading for a particular conclusion or just trying to keep me busy?
A particular conclusion.  What about events that are apparently of no interest to anyone?  I don't mean to appear to be just keeping you busy but clarity of choice, in this text, is becoming more elusive.
The events (apparently of no interest) are chosen by someone and are of particular interest to someone.
Consider a fire in a remote section of forest.  This has probably happened millions of times without man being even conscious of the occurrence; not to mention his interest in choosing a forest fire as being highly unlikely.
Forest fires are a very natural phenomena that allows the forest to balance out its growth cycle. Every few decades, it must have a fire to eliminate the dead scraggly branches and underbrush re-cycling itself (as it were) for fertilizing the young new growth - providing it light and moisture to grow up - big and strong - A "non-event?"  
Hardly!
But this isn't chosen by an individual, is it?
Not a person as such - a creative entity/soul/thought mass/ consciousness.
Is a mutation also a choice of consciousness?
There is not a mutation as in evolution but mutations can be changes as a result of such detriments as poisons and incompatible chemicals.
Would such a change create an immunity?
More like a protection from them.  Smaller orifices in the exposed areas.  Smaller lung capacity - the eyelashes - eyebrows and hair in the ears and nose become thicker and coarser.
What causes man to age?
Woman.
Come now.  You don't want me to print that as your answer?... although on second thought!
Joking, my dears!  It is the choice of each!  But - very seriously the idea of other's opinions of you, cause you to choose "aging" or not - generally or not.
So, if one were isolated, would he not age?
Many who are isolated wither and die.  Those who enjoy love and growing, weather.
But you said other's opinions are what makes one age and simultaneously you say a person in isolation, without opinion, can wither and die.  Sounds like a contradiction to me.
One cannot be alone.  Each has a mate - persons - animals - shoes -  The idea of pairing is to grow in love - without that, one (anyone or thing!) does not grow - reproduce or bloom!
Would you relate this with other's opinions?
Without another, one cannot have a 'comparison' (for lack of a better word).  Each needs another to grow with - reproduce with - match (oppose) - compete with.  I am trying to simplify a phenomena that cannot be "simply' put.
When you say "weather," do you mean relative to man's average lifespan?
James, I used that particular word to seem witty and clever.  If you must have concise definitions: each person "ages" relatively to the average "age" of man.  In comparison to a turtle, he lives shortly - compared to a mosquito he is long-lived.  The point is - without comparing to other mortals, what is aged or youthful?  Do you see?
What keeps man from living to be 300 to 400 years old?  I read recently where a renowned physicists expounded that man my ultimately live for 150 years or older and that many live consistently to 125 in certain civilizations.
What would you do for 150 years?
Based on mans' present aging process I'd probably spend the last 60 years comatose!  The point I'm trying to make is this would be much longer than the present relative age of man.
What's to explain?   Do you believe that you have not?  In which lifetime?  In what plane?  For what purpose?
Touche!  I won't pester you on this one.  I get the distinct impression this question bores you and that it's going nowhere.
Dear James, I know this seems cynical but there is no 'logical' way for me to convey some thing to you.  It is - that is all.  I am not being evasive or confounding but until we have progressed in some other areas, this line of questioning is too abstract.
Let's go back to the brief discussion we had on earth's population.  Why has it exploded so recently and what is it supposed to teach man?  It would appear Earth's lessons are changing rather than remaining an Earth plane constant.
The lessons are always changing but the increase in population only changes the quantity not the quality of the incarnations (and therefore the 'lessons').  The Universal Mind still has some objectives but the pursuit of those objectives are more varied with the additional 'bodies.'  
The 'explosion' is proof that man believes himself to be capable of immortality.  Rather than just living until one has completed the 'lesson,' he is now beginning to use the human form as that first step to 'life everlasting.'  It is a common misconception that if the 'body' is 'alive' - the soul also lives.  It is a rather stupid deduction and only adds to the miseries of 'mortal life.'
How does this relate to India and Africa where huge populations are lacking protections to preserve life?  Where is the justice in this?...or with these "unfortunates" is there meant to be justice?
Each has a choice.  Justice is a misleading word.  Do you judge the condition of "unfortunate" souls?  Perhaps they are enjoying life on a plane that you are not yet aware of.
You ask if I judge them or their condition - that perhaps they enjoy that which I'm not yet aware (although I can't imagine what that could be.)  Yet about dying, you have said, "It's easier than living well."  Please, add some continuity to these statements.
Some persons in these circumstances have already ascended the physical plane and rather than continue to try to fortify the shell of their mortal body, just pass the plane.  The circumstances seem most dire to you but until you have lived in their framework you cannot know their interests and awareness (or lack of it).  
In the areas as you mentioned - it is an obligation of the common people to produce many children, as they can be utilized for labor and such. The quality of life is actually not as 'bad' as you may think.  Most have little in the way of possessions but at least have enough food to sustain 'life' and their common goal is to live and reproduce.
That may be their purpose, but what is the purpose intended by the Universal Mind?
I suppose it is to understand the most basic of emotions and drives.  Just above the role of animals and the most simple and common instincts - survival and reproduction.

                                 DEATH   

How does one know his lesson is learned on this plane?  Is it possible to develop so much within one incarnation that death is delayed?
It begins before the lesson is learned, James.   I believe we have gone over this before many times.  The entity chooses a facet to 'send in' for a certain lesson - it is 'set' beforehand just what the circumstances will be - the others involved, the duration of the incarnation, and the means to end the incarnation.  Some blow out their brains or accept illnesses etc., but it is pretty well determined, before he is incarnated.
What you are saying is that it's foolish to try to extend life past the chosen point?
Yes - that just about sums it up!
Why did Jesus - such an aware persons - choose such a painful death?  I thought yours was more in line with development - that is, if sensual pleasure has anything to do with it.  (He told us he passed away on a ship in Boston Harbor after having a glass of brandy).
Each has a choice!  He chose a very dramatic demise to emphasize the message he had brought to others - It may be difficult in this plane but you can stick to your principles and even if they put you to death (painfully) it is better than dying first in your heart.
Pope John Paul I died recently.  How does he view Catholicism from his present plane?
Little lost sheep - and he is the shepherd.
You mean he doesn't have a different viewpoint from his new vantage point?
Not yet - he is intended for a long rest from all the 'intrigues' of the church.
How have former Popes awakening from this long rest, appraised Catholicism?
Some have had startling changes, some a 'blase' passing from one viewpoint to the other and the previous, somewhat a challenge to get back in the fray and teach someone something.
Yesterday 270 or more people were killed on a United flight 191 out of O'Hare.  I still find it beyond comprehension that many people can find their way at one time, to a single jet, which serves as their chosen demise.
Have you considered other disasters in history?  The plagues, the bombings, the Titanic, the Hindenburg?  There are examples throughout the world.
Certainly I have but didn't consider their deaths as having been chosen.  I didn't mean to specify flight 191 as the only source of consternation.  My dismay has to do with the congregation, the method and that it was a choice by all.
It could be a number of reasons - the convenience for a seasoned traveler - the drama for one not well-traveled.  It was quick, through and final - that was the main prerequisite.
Do the entities involved in such an air crash such as 191 and the PSA crash in San Diego hover about the wreckage  in their "astral jackets" aware they have been killed and perceive the entities of the other victims?
The 'facets' of these entities - who were killed in the crash - may hover about for awhile - as most persons do at death - the astral and ethereal body making certain of the details of the death - Yes they see others also hovering about and are curious about their demises as well as their own.
Why do they want all the details?
It is recorded in their 'journal of life' so they can reflect on it and not choose the same demise later - in similar circumstances.
I still find it incomprehensible that many people all chose to die at the same time under the same circumstances.  But a lot of what I thought improbable seems more likely with each of your "stories."
There will be other things that your will find more incredible as you further your development - but they are all real and the more fantastic after a while will seem very ordinary to you.
Should I understand why the Steele family in West Virginia would choose to loose ten members of its family in one scaffolding accident.  I understand this, only to the extent, that I should perhaps understand it was their common choice.
James, this is a very difficult situation to explain.  I am in agreement that it is quite improbable that all had planned this demise but that is the only explanation that I can render at this time.  There was a great bond among them and pitiful as it may seem, it was their choice.  They had in several of the 'clan' a common entity.  As for the others, they chose to become another part of the entity.
You mean these family members chose to have a common entity in this incarnation?                             
The entity was very powerful and needed the 'concentration of mortality' at this particular time.  It is not unusual for an entity to have several incarnations simultaneously and in this case had several 'empathetic' incarnates.
I don't understand 1) concentration of mortality and 2) empathetic incarnates.
1) A concentration of mortals all with a common thought form that had to be expressed 2) Empathetic with the 'main' entities ideals.  It was as if the entity were a crusader and had all his 'clan' plus a group of sympathetic others in close harmony with his ideal.
What has dying or sacrificing, by the empathetic entities, got to do with development of the crusader?  Or, better yet, visa versa?
The empathetic entities do this in hopes of 'coat-tailing' into a state of development.
Should we mortals, who understand this, be less anguished at the death of loved ones?  (Do I sound, that by asking this question, like I wouldn't be anguished in similar circumstances?  Afraid not).
The passing of one into other planes is not regrettable.  It is a joyful time for those passing to be released from the restrictive bodies of 'earth' (ie. mortal) plane.  There is also the joy of knowing that one is moving on to higher planes.
How can we prepare ourselves to accept this attitude?
Try to understand that this plane is just one of many.  You never actually 'lose' your loved ones.  You are always - infinitely - bonded together even through the "veil" (the 'partition' of the planes).  You may mourn the physical loss of touch - etc. but you will not-need not - mourn for your loved one's presence.  This is difficult to simplify with your present 'limited' view of time and space but will become more clear as you begin to travel out-of-body.  Then you may visit other planes and know that you will always have your loved close by.
(For those of you who wonder if I have yet become accomplished at out-of-body experiences, let me say, not even unaccomplished).
Regarding the final stages of a mortals life, what might be a fitting conversation between a mortal and his loving guide?  I know how most relatives would act, like me (boo hoo hoo, boo ho hoo) but what would you say?  My impression, by your attitude of mortal life, would lead me to believe you'd say something like, "Hurry up, it great up here!!!"
There are some mortals that would not 'converse' with a guide (no matter how 'loving' the guide).  In your case - I would say 'Come fly with me!' just as I do in your attempts to travel - for it is very similar.  As for the regrets of 'deaths' - it is only that we are (shortly) separated from loved ones - but there is always a reuniting of true loves - so never fear.
And what's best said between loving mortals one of whom is known to die?                                                                     
The best approach is to simply say, 'I love you' and' I wish to comfort you!'  You are my beloved and we will continue beyond this life.  The statement should be simple but HONEST!
Victor, why does the soul leave the body during a sickness or after an accident when in fact the body has not demised and the soul returns to the body?  It would seem that the soul would leave the body only if the body was mortally finished.
There are times when the 'soul' is anxious to escape the mortal body.  An accident or severe illness is usually the footnote of a disturbing situation with the total 'facet.'
On the return to their body many people, having been pronounced dead, tell of actually meeting "God."  Can you enlighten me on their meeting with God?
As each person passes from this plane, he is greeted by his guides (or helpers) to help him through the transition period which for some is rather frightening and confusing.  As for seeing "God" - persons see whomever is their symbol of "the other side."
I wish there had been such an understanding between my sister-in-law, Judy, and her son who suddenly died in his sleep last month.  She is in such sorrow with the suddenness of the death of her son.  Would this sudden departure indicate he'd finally experienced what he chose in this incarnation?
Yes, he has learned and there was no more need to stay on in this plane.  I am sure his mother will be rocked by this for some time but if she can only see that this is a transition - not an end, her bereavement will be lessened.  
Of course this is a difficult time to try to explain some of your lessons but it may give her some comfort if you could talk to her.
If Michael had been more aware of the process, would or could he, have extended his life?
He may have - IF HE HAD CHOSEN - but more likely he'd have done the same thing perhaps preparing his loved ones a bit more.
What was the lesson that Mitch accomplished?
He was learning (mainly) adjusting to others temperaments.  He had a wide range to learn from and the correct exposure to them.  He was already finished with the lesson some time ago and had wanted to leave sooner but felt there was one last step to cover - he did and he's very confident now that he has completed his stint in this plane.
You say this as though it was a conscious choice.
Not consciously - of course - that would be too much for most (youngsters) to cope with.  He'd have tried to tell the others and I'm afraid it would have been worse than this very sudden way of going.
Has Judy been told of our communication with a guide?  (My son may have told his mother, from whom I was divorced, who may have told her sister, Judy).
Only an inkling - she has heard the 'worst' from her sister and has probably scoffed.  You could present her a very brief explanation and later - after the crowd thins out a bit - she may want to discuss it further.  But very importantly - try not to present it to her only to allay her grief.  She will be grasping at straws right now and this may be too emotional a time for her to seek.  Her ex-husband has some interest here and may open up the channel to talk with her.
Is Mitch already in a transition state of rest or is he capable of yet communicating a message to his mother and father?
He is in a rest period.  He may be able to convey a message but not at this moment.  Assure her that this is best for his development.  She may find comfort in knowing that he is going on to other levels of development and this is only a transition - not an end.  It is a joyous time for the one who is passed.  The grief will subside and she may 'know' this later as she reflects on her son.
My mother's death has always troubled me.  She never gave me any indication that she realized death was upon her and seemed to avoid accepting the reality of her terminal brain tumor.
She truly believed that when her time (on Earth) was done - she would go to purgatory until "God" called her up to her true place in "Heaven."  Ridiculous!  She was a bit confused for a short time but when she finally realized her true place - she was overjoyed - only slightly dismayed she could not convey to all (you) left behind that she had indeed found "heaven' (in another plane) No hell no purgatory!
I'm sure we'll be able to laugh about her fear of purgatory and her insecurity with the dollar at some later date.
My dearest!  She is so joyous!  Her stocks are so minor in comparison to what she enjoys now!  Do you remember when we first talked - communicated on the Ouija?  I said 'Polly is so happy.' You will all be together again - not too soon but in another lifetime - on another plane.
What is sad to me Victor, is that as a child I realized that mother didn't enjoy much on this earth.  How does she reevaluate her life now?
She is so happy - now - enjoying her leisure and a wonderful teacher.  She is so much more aware now than ever before.  You will be able to contact her one day - James and Know for yourself that she is thrilled for you and also for Joy - the loves of her life - on Earth - You will feel more at ease with her here than ever before.  She is a stunning woman/entity.
What lesson would she want me to learn?
The lesson - and if only she had known then! - is to enjoy your life - help where you can but do not be forlorn when you cannot help - and that everyone goes on to something better than you can ever imagine.  Leaving 'mortal planes' is a release - a great joy!  She only wishes you to 'know.'
Please convey I got her message and that I love her dearly.
She is very aware that you love her and the message is well conveyed.  She is aware of your happiness - how could she not be?  She loves you dearly ---
Was mother, and all other souls that passed into other planes from Earth, aware of all past experiences or is there more development to acquire the knowledge of all past lives?
If you have completed all our learning experiences you will know all that you need to know.  It may surprise you to learn how simple it is in the final stages.  This learning period is the most difficult period you will EVER endure.
In other planes, what event accounts for the changing of planes, as death does on Earth plane?
Choice.
Where else does death occur?
Only in the movies!
Funny...I mean what other plane?
It really does not  occur.  In most planes, if one chooses to move to another plane or take a resting period, and he has prepared himself through awareness - he simply does it.  No tragic illnesses or accidents.  He just goes away - fades out!
Then what is death meant to teach us?  Just an expectancy or should I say an eventuality?
It is a man-made idea.  There is not merit in it - just anxiety - will I finish all I have to do before I DIE?  Will it be painful?  Will I be a coward in the face of death?  Man has always used DEATH as a punishment for living.  It is NOT AT ALL!!  Death is - a passing from this plane - generally to another so similar that many do not even realize they have passed.  There are very gentle graduations until you arrive at the higher planes where the steps are much more pronounced (but then you are much more prepared for the steps and there is not fear).
Are you saying the physical body needn't expire or that it would continue to function if we didn't perceive death?
The body is not very useful in other planes - not even much good in this one except as a reference point for the 'soul.'  Many persons believe when this 'body' has lost its usefulness it's all over for the entire personality.  We know that is not so, but for some it is very hard to accept 'new' ideas and if they cannot see - feel - touch and taste it - it is not so!  Very limited.
What happen to the various levels of consciousness such as alpha, delta and theta after death.  Are some of these states of consciousness eliminated or do they all meld into one conscious state after death?
Death as you envision it is only the passing from one level to another.  A consciousness is not eliminated but only changes perspective.  'Death' brings a release from certain preconceived notions of limitation.
What about the various levels of human consciousness?
Those are physical measurements of alertness - in another plane, one could be in any or all of these - and more!
Is there a specific line of delineation as to which preconceived notions are eliminated at death?
Not especially - some 'persons' never want to let go of some thoughts (limited though they may be). Eventually they accept the idea that nothing has to remain in the form of limitations - then the real 'fun' begins!
If a facet is innately good, Victor, how can he choose illness as a means to die?
If the end results are chosen, the means can be an illness, affliction or some other disability.  It does not have to be that way but it can be!
I understand that we manifest our illnesses but could our negative actions lead to sickness without us choosing sickness?
No!  It is always the choice of the recipient - even if the 'influences' are beyond his control.  If the stress is overwhelming, the results will be likewise.
What is the process to heal ones self?
The process is to reject the negative thoughts - think of your positive results in all other areas and 'see' yourself as well and happy.
Is this the basis for the Symington Cancer Cure?
It will be when it's more accepted - you've got to believe first!!  The presentation can change the course - but not the end result.  It is THEIR CHOICE!
The presentation has produced a high rate of change which may not have been accounted for if left up the individuals who sought his cure.
It is still their choice of whether or not to participate in the 'program.'  After all 25 or 30 is a small percentage of the thousands that die of it.
But, what if all affected were presented the program as a cure?
Those that choose to live - would - those would die that would not believe and choose.
How is belief induced into such a program as the Symington Cure?
Desperation!
Desperation doesn't sound like a very solid foundation for belief.
When people have lost all hope in the KNOWN - they can perceive the UNKNOWN and perhaps not be limited by 'logic' (as they know it).
How can one determine the person who has chosen to get well and who has chosen his demise?
It is hard to imagine that many souls choose difficult circumstances, in some of their lives.  When you see the difference in other planes, though, you may understand why.  Not everyone is attuned to a physical existence.  Each has chosen whatever he (or she) will encounter in this plane or any other.
But they don't choose as though it was an apple or an orange.  Aren't you saying they choose in a circuitous manner?
Not at all!  Many try to make themselves and others believe that everything is "out of their hands" but it is in fact exactly as they have chosen.  Exactly!!
What about my hernia?
Would you rather have had it manifest as a cancer?  As a diverticulitis?
I never once thought of a hernia and knew less about kidney stones yet I received one of each with no conscious effort on my part to visualize them as providing a lesson to a choice.
The result you chose was a debilitating experience in which you would suffer much pain, perhaps surgery, and the lurking danger of death.  You accomplished all of the choices.  The mind, brain and body work extremely well together and can produce any results you desire and if you didn't consciously know of such maladies, you learned of them SOMEWHERE my dear friend!
The most debilitating choice was the V.A. surgeon's stitch                                                                                                 The fact is you have incurred some damage to your 'nearly' perfect body and all care should be taken to never have such an experience again.  Not really worth all the aggravation, is it?
No it isn't.  Letting something subtly slip in, like those two experiences, prompts my wonderment as to how well man does with his present awareness or should I say in spite of it.
There is always the possibility of things like this 'slipping in,' James, but as always - it is your choice and some persons even choose illness to 'test their mettle' or demonstrate what they have had to overcome (to others) so on and on.  The case can be as 'serious' as one wishes it to be.  I cannot change any one's opinion of what he or she feels is their just due.  Is it not a great waste??
Is it a choice to continue to be afflicted more often the case than choosing good health?
Yes, many find it bothersome to analyze their illnesses and the reasons for choosing them and just continue with the status quo.  After all - that way they get lots of attention that might otherwise not be there.  Sick!
We hear a lot about pesticides and how they cause cancer.  What is the relationship of well developed souls and the affect of carcinogens?
There is no relationship! a poison is a poison.  A well developed soul (if he is truly well-developed) can discern poison foods, as easily as poisoned words; however, it is (or is becoming) very common to be exposed to "carcinogens" (a coined word only recently being used to describe a carcic - effecting reaction of chemicals at certain temperatures having the effect of substance poisons).
Is the same true regarding infections, virus' etc., or do we not become symptomatically infected?
There is a choice -if you believe you will be infected - then surely you will.  In the 'plagues' of Europe - Asia and the Orient etc. - not everyone was infected.  In fact, in the Orient - the lease were infected - because of their beliefs in the body being the vessel of the soul and if the soul can 'rise above' - then also the body can be protected from the "Diseases of the non-believers" (as the plagues were called in the vernacular of the day).
How can an affliction or sickness be hereditary if they are the manifestation of choice?
Sometimes persons in a similar environment with similar thoughts and ideas, manifest similar diseases that is thought to be passed on from one generation to another - Humbug!!
You must have a dour outlook on any proposed National Health Insurance Plan.
I feel the public does not have a responsibility to its 'non-thinking' members.  We do, however, seem to take responsibility for them - thus all the unimaginative public care systems.  If more persons would take responsibility for their own lives, it would certainly ease some of the pressures for such 'programs.'
How can an aware "healer" continue his efforts with inspiration, if he's aware enough to first be able to heal and secondly be aware enough to realize the affliction was the result of a choice by the afflicted?
The person who is sick or afflicted (by his choice, of course) has THEN chosen not to be sick or afflicted.  In other words, some persons choose illnesses etc. then because of circumstances - decide they would really rather be well -and ask for help (not especially verbally but you will know)! 
The lesson to be learned is not to eliminate 'doing' for others - but to discern where one draws the line between help and manipulation.  It's a perception after all.
Prior to the "doing" how do you suggest one determine if the results will be helpful to the afflicted or if he's being manipulated.                                                        He cannot pre-determine - it's just a matter of KNOWING - and you must experience both extremes to determine it for yourself.
What is Universals Minds viewpoint in the difference between suicide and another demise chosen by an entity?
It is the choice chosen by the entity.
There is no difference in the acceptance of one over the other?
Only that suicide is shocking to those 'left' behind and much less 'acceptable' than a bloody train wreck, a chemical explosion, a murder etc!  Much different are 'attempted suicides' for they are not really meant to succeed - only to draw attention - when they do succeed - it is sometimes quite a shock to the "suicidee" (the total entity may choose this - not just the fragment personality).
The nature of self-expression is your choice but 'destruction' does not seem the proper inference when discussing one's alternatives.
How can one hope to succeed in attracting attention, by jumping off a twenty story building, when no one's watching?
When he actually jumps that is one thing but if he just goes out on the limb or ledge - it is only for attention.  Sometimes the total entity will 'see' this happening and decide the fragment personality is not really too constructive and furthermore not going to be - so he suddenly 'recalls' that model - a slip of the foot - the limb breaks off or whatever and zap! - his little scheme for attention has backfired!  He's not there to cash in on all the attention.
For what reason did Rosie hang himself?  (This was the college age boy that my son invited to stay at our house until "college started").  Did his entity provide the final slip?
He was finished with this incarnation and did not want to linger.  The choice was a bit melodramatic but it achieved the end result he wanted.  He is on a much better plane now.
What did Rosie learn in his last incarnation?  (Rosie, for those of you who want a character analysis came to live with my family under the guise of a college student who would appreciate someone providing free room and board "till college starts."  Rosie didn't appreciate more than what he could wrangle out of you with a lie, deceit, manipulation or bad manners and completed his personality trait by being boisterous, egotistical and obnoxious.  I finally severed his stay one evening at dinner after he unconscionably helped himself to more ham than I had mentally rationed him which further justified my choice due to his continued unwillingness to mow the lawn, wash dishes or generally "pull his freight."
Not much!  His purpose was to gain some insight into others - however, his personality was a bit unprepared for dealing with others.  He was selfish, self centered and obnoxious - this was not the best approach to know others.
Well, you have at least given me a greater appreciation of my tolerance by having put-up with him as long as I did.  If you can, you might suggest to him the abstinence of some foods in his diet and that he not return as a Jew.  I recall his fondness of ham all too well.
You were a SAINT! (as far as patience was concerned in the matter).  Too bad that sometimes we have to be made 'fools' before we realize that we have a choice.  I shall pass along your advice as I am sure he would enjoy the humor of it now.
Please do!  Incidentally, how can a personality be so radically indifferent to the intent of the lesson?
It is the choice of their personality.  The intent of the total entity is to 'learn' no matter how many 'round trips' he must make.  Some personalities enjoy the earthly plane and want only to enjoy the sensual nature of his incarnation - some enjoy the esthetic and cannot wait to be relieved of the physical body - thus they concentrate fully on evolving the personality.
Did Rosie choose his personality or did he possibly receive one that just didn't match his lesson?
The entity chose to have a facet of itself incarnated to learn a certain portion of the total knowledge (needed by the entity).  Rosie appeared - he was sensual in nature and enjoyed all the 'earthly' pleasures - exceedingly!  The 'total entity' (his 'master' form) realized he was wasting much time and said "Home Rosie!  It is not the right time for your encounters!"
What's the difference between your advise for us to enjoy sensually and Rosie being hanged for it?
Rosie was not learning - just using it to pass the time - and he hung himself!  It was not punishment!
If an entity can send a facet of itself in for a specific lesson and can recall itself if something goes awry, what happens or goes wrong when a Hitler is produced?
An entire entity is innately good - choosing only to grow and develop - not gain stature (power) on the back of others (in other words, via malicious acts).  The facet (Hitler) became demented and was recalled, however, it was much, much too late for too much damage had already been done.
After such a debacle does the entire entity suffer or is the "blame" on the facet?
The entire entity and he will take much longer to regain his previous level and may never be able to overcome the damage caused by this one facet.
Why would the entity be punished?
Not punished, James, for persons (entities) are only "judged" by themselves.  He should (or could) have been more aware of the end results and would have chosen to recall the facet much sooner.
Was he "crap-shooting?"  It was obvious from the outset, wasn't it?
The man could have been a great leader - he knew how to arouse emotional involvement - knew how to 'spark' the really gifted but he used it for personal gain (power euphoria) instead of universal good!
I was referring to the entity as the "crap-shooter".
Yes, I understand the question - in a way, I suppose he was aware of the quality of the facet but he seemed to just let it go and see where the dust settled.  I was a BIG mistake in his total development.
You say and entity is inherently good and yet these are indications of lacking common sense.  Could this be part ego on the entities part to allow the facet to run wild - as some parents allow their children?
I suppose it could be part ego - but generally it is just lack of interest or even laziness, expecting the facet to assume total responsibility for that particular lesson and just letting it "run its rein."
What's the relationship between the choice of Hitler's victims and his entity?  There's an obvious disparity or contradiction of choice between to two.
In some cases, one mortal killing another has some redeeming value - if the 'killed' is suffering and it is his choice!  In a case where one has chosen a very short term in this plane - an "accident" can be a great relief.  It is all relative and though it seems morbid - in some cases it is very acceptable.
I mean between Hitler's entity and the people who "probably" had other ideas about their future.  The disparity; the millions murdered by one entity - they couldn't all have wanted or chosen to die.
Of course there is a disparity here!  The 'facet' (i.e. Hitler) was demented and could have been stopped by his entity (who instead - looked upon the situation as too far gone to change - It was a BIG mistake)!
Back to what is - is?
The choice was not in the area of growth - it was a mistake.  It is - in a sense - now a cause for many more than those who were mutilated and maimed and killed, but it is not unlike the more recent situation in South East Asia and the burning of millions by the (generally accepted) saviors - the Americans - the French - and the English!  It is the most morbid reality of the Earth plane!
Let's get back to choices.  Had I been a Jew in Hitler's Germany would my choice, being what it is, saved me from being incinerated?
This particular subject is very dour to me but if you care to speculate further - I do not believe you would have been lost in the melee - you would have more probably been involved in the escape and rehabilitation of the many who did not perish in that time.
I want to understand the merit in making a choice, in spite of such diversities as the SS troops of WWII.
If all those involved had chosen to overcome the aspects of that time - and many did (overcome and survive) there would have been few casualties.  The point is - those who were not even aware of their own choice - perished!  It still does come back to choosing!
Incidentally, did Hitler die when the Russian's conquered Berlin?
My information has it that he did not 'die' in Germany but that he spent about fourteen years after the 'war' in Poland and Switzerland.
To you, was Hitler's choice a crime?
He was a malicious, egotistical maniac!
But was what he did a crime?  (I was hoping he didn't say no - I was almost prepared to stop at this point had he said NO)!
James, this is a very difficult subject to discuss.  Firstly we must establish - what is a crime?  Some acts - deemed criminal by a certain civilization are not a crime against man - or even nature!  Some acts - considered very civilized are a crime against man (himself).  As for drugs - many drugs that are criminal in some civilizations are a part of another`s culture.  Sex is another area where there is much difference.  Stealing - is a generally accepted 'wrong' but do we not all steal from nature?  Where do you define crime?  It is all in the intent and if it is malicious toward another - then it is a crime.  I feel his hatred alone was a crime.  The atrocities - by him and also his followers - were malicious crimes against his fellow man.  No question involved - no reason - and no retribution.  That is the point of 'crime.'  Is it malicious?  Is it premeditated?  Is there an end result insight?  That's the point of question.
How about an abrupt subject change?  Why is it that the birth control pill has been introduced to man at this time?
Introduced to womans' use!  Joking aside, man has longed for centuries for an effective contraceptive method to indulge in his favorite sport without (always) "seeing" it to fruition.  The chemicals are not well investigated and can do much harm to the mortal form.  It is foreign to the body and causes transformations that may be permanently damaging to the reproductive system.
Is there an effective but safe method of contraception?
Only permanent ligation (tubal ligation or vasectomy) or complete abstinence.
Did you forget, by choice?
Few persons have enough confidence in their choice to trust that in birth control.
You speak as if there are stratums of confidence in choice making.
Some persons (nothing 'too' personal) believe in their choices in one area and question or doubt them in other areas.  It is not always a clear cut 'trait' to choose or not - some choose a little and leave the rest to chance.
I can think immediately of a couple of choices that would qualify me as a "quitter."   (I am aware, now, that I tried to disprove the idea of choice manifestation by absurdities.  This certainly won't be the last time, or by far, the least absurd.)
Sounds illogical and there really is not much personal reward in some of your choices.
Seriously, do I have more problems with this concept than most?
Do not compare yourself with others' progress, James.  How do you choose to progress?  What do you choose?  Where do you choose to be?  Do you get my point?
You are kind to stick it out while I labor with these lessons, old friend.
It is not out of kindness, James.  I choose to be with those I love!  You are not doing badly - only by your own high standards does this seem to be slow.
Can you sense my difficulty in accepting the idea of choice?  My first choice lessons begin with you after a mid life crisis, besides having been conditioned to the contrary from childhood.
It may be difficult to throw away forty odd years of thinking and conditioning.  I see your point and I do sympathize with your 'limited' outlook - THEN - as a man - as a very aware man, I will not condone the past as a refuge for your doubts.  The life you have begins NOW - and is 'good or bad' as you choose!  You have now all the accouterments for a happy, sane, significant life full of your choices.  That is all James.

                                            THE BRAIN   

If the brain is an "accouterment" how or where is man's memory stored - in his brain, his mind, soul?
In Universal Consciousness - available at any time for any use.
How is it possible to extract a telephone number from all the information stored in Universal Consciousness?
Just as you may be assigned a computer readout number that gives, only you, access to certain information - Universal Consciousness can select information only for specific cases and relay it on a moments notice.  (This service was available long before computers were available on a "share" basis).
Why are some people more adapt at extracting information?
For some it is important to keep "plugged in" to the source of such information - for others 'creative' time is more important.
I must be real creative.  After I move it takes me two weeks to remember my new phone number.
Yes - you are!  Use it!!
If the brain doesn't store memory why does destruction of certain parts of it affect memory?
Does it?  Or does the removal of certain lobes only change one's attitude about the memories?  After all, people don't forget how to tie their shoes or comb their hair or???
Why should it change one's attitude?  Cutting off a finger or leg doesn't affect memory.
Or really?
Well, I'm not aware of limb losses, changing memory capabilities.
They may just as well as losing one's brain cell may.  When persons begin to experience senility - they are very aware of the degeneration.
Is age the cause of senility or visa versa?
The age is not the criteria - it is the use or disuse of the "machine."
If physical damage or partial brain removal doesn't impair memory why does electrical stimulation work?
Yes - it can be even stimulated to do that without electrical stimuli - It can be done with MIND CONTROL!
So, what's the point of so many billions of brain cells if all we have to do is rely on Universal Consciousness?  As they say we're doing it anyway with 1/10 our capacity.
You would not want your eyes to cave in would you?  or your eyes to recess?
There is more!
Yes - but to simplify: the mass of the brain is mostly unused - as you know!
I assume it isn't to full capacity but why are certain subjects more easily learned by one individual than another?
Some are more 'plugged in' to Universal Mind - it depends on what is most important to the individual.
Why hasn't mans' brain atrophied, like a muscle, if he only uses 10% of its capacity?
You already know. Why ask?
I'm not aware of knowing.  Ok, how about this - why doesn't the brain increase, with use, like a muscle?
The brain is a gift from sources other than those with which your are familiar.  The 'amount' was set for a number of reasons and may be used or unused as you wish.  The fact that it is available is enough to make some interested in using it for their own 'good.'  Others just take for granted that it functions and will continue to function on only that level.  It is a great revelation when one learns that it is limitless (in human terms) and may always be tapped further.  Creative forces can use more and more - if allowed.
You say "sources" as though we were bolted together in some cosmic space garage by a bunch of space beings.
There are sources with which your are not familiar.
I'm convinced of that but wasn't the brain created by Universal Mind - exclusively?
What is your question, James?  Are you a toy of some superior being?  No!  Are you a lower form of this master intelligence?  No?  Are you yet capable of knowing this?  No!
My question is: here we are, with a body and brain from a source other than Universal Mind which purpose is to allow experiences to develop the soul?
Your purpose - as a mortal - is to experience sensual stimuli (not particular to sexual).  All senses are to be expanded to the ultimate and eventually then you learn to expand more than the physical senses; that is - the metaphysical also.
How are we to know what is wild imagination and what is accomplishable reality for our choices to experience?  I'm sure my perspective on this question could be expanded with a little help or... better yet, proof.
If you would like a simple - concrete - tangible answer, James, I haven't one for you.  The questions are impressed on your racial consciousness and prompt you to search for answers that may lead you to search for answers to your deeper questions.  I know this is frustrating to you at this point but there are reasons for this lesson also.
Is consciousness an intrinsic function of the brain?
The brain is a tool of consciousness.
Can you elaborate?
Yes, if necessary.
Can you elaborate how the chemical and electrical interactions within the brain effect/produce consciousness?  Am I being presumptuous that consciousness is a by-product of the brain rather than exclusive of it.
To elaborate upon the first question; the brain is like a thermostat in a heating system.  It regulates the input of power to produce heat and stops the input when not needed.  The brain allows input of sensory energies supplied by the consciousness, then stops it when there is too much to be useful.  The further point I might add is that one can function in the conscious levels (of other levels) without using the brain to regulate input, excepts for function as breathing, blood flow and organ management.  The thought consciousness has nothing to do with these primary functions.
The analogy to the thermostat suggests that the brain processes inputs from external sources.  Correct?
The source is the all encompassing creativity sometimes known as the God - The God - all that is - supra-consciousness - ad-infinitum.  The logic of physics cannot explain this phenomenon.
How do you explain the incredible intuitive grasp of Albert Einstein?
He was a very advanced soul.  He has achieved great steps in the field and in his way of trying to explain to his colleagues in a simple enough manner for their limited views of time and space.
What was his reaction at death to discover that his consciousness continued to exist?  It's recognized he did not believe in a life after death.
He was delighted.  After all, he could then (and does) continue his very important work - trying to equate the thought/energy mass and bring it down to a simple enough thought for most mortals to comprehend.  He is a much jollier fellow now that he knows he has all the 'time and space' he needs. Ha!
Why do mortals need a brain?  The non-physical states don't require one.                                      
The brain is like a computer.  It's main function is to program many petty little jobs that are otherwise a nuisance to look after.  When one is rid of the nuisances (mainly the limitations of the physical body) he no longer needs the 'service.'
Sounds to me it functions more for physical than mental needs.
It is mainly to control physical functions.  As you know very little of it is used for thought!
So, if I've got this right, we should be attempting to increase the extent of our consciousness rather than the use of our brain?
Certainly!  Let's!!
I'm all for it!  Now tell me how this is accomplished.
Time in meditation.  Meditate for deeper levels of awareness and use your inner senses - it can be used for telepathy - clairvoyance, travel (astral projection), telekinesis.  Less restrictive thinking and we shall transcend that limited thinking.  This is a good start.
Very simply, James.  Peace within - simplify your thoughts - take time to reflect on your life and your accomplishments, do not rehash past trivialities, just revel in love and harmony you now enjoy.  Live you life and love.  
The best beginning advice I can give anyone is begin.   Read - reflect - record - relax -- the realization - alone - of your goals and thoughts will change most persons lives.
Will science ever understand the working of the brain and its relationship to mortal life?
Scientists may uncover the "mysteries" but few will ever comprehend its power.  Only those who use it will ever get it!

                   CLONING AND CRYOGENICS   

If man were to fully understand the purpose of the human body would he still be interested in cryogenics (freezing the body until thawed at some later date) and cloning (reproducing and exact duplicate)?
Some mortals cannot let go of the idea that the human body, because it is the vessel of the soul/mind/entity, is the link to immortality.  We who know the process, know that the body is as negligible as the envelope in which you send an important letter.  When it reaches the destination, the envelope may be discarded.
Does a "discarded" envelope mean it cannot be recycled and used again?
Oh it can be reused, but not as useful or as important as the first use, right?  In the case of 'clones' their probable use will be for servants of a master for they will never have an original thought.  As for cryogenics, I feel that's a process of recycling materials in a case where there is certainly no shortage; in fact, an over-abundance.
What function will a revitalized body have emerging from cryogenics?  Would the entity return to it?
I myself do not understand the purpose of using and 'old body.'  Revitalized or not, I would still prefer a brand new model.  As for the entity returning; perhaps in a rare case, but generally the entity has gone far beyond the level of that body.
So what will man learn from this experiment?
Perhaps a bit more about the inner "workings" of the human machine.  I personally feel that it's rather wasteful to learn about dead bodies, why not spend the time and effort on perfecting the living body?
If the entity does not return to the recycled body, will it then be like a clone regarding original thought capacity?
It will be less than a clone - only an empty shell carrying on motions and mechanical functions but with no thoughts, ideas, motives, emotions etc.  It will be like a robot.
Why would a clone act differently - certainly no entity would choose a body produced in a test tube- would they?
The clone would be part of a human, an exact duplicate originating from the entity.  In this case, the entity would have a fresh body to change into (as a suit of clothes) in the case of the original failing in some way.  The clone is instilled with the same basic intelligence etc. as the original.  He only lacks the creativity but would have that also if the entity decided to use that body instead of the original.
Will a recycled or cloned body ever stop functioning (die) as there will be no mind function or choice prior to reincarnation to determine the method of death?
The knowledge instilled in the original lifetime will determine the health and well-being of the body no matter how many times recycled.

                   THE CHOICES OF CHILDREN    

When I focus on a mortal's purpose of existence, it doesn't seem to be all that complicated or complex - other than a number of experiences; hopefully in the direction of development?
Each man's reality is as he perceives it - could be VERY basic or very complex - as you choose.  Whatever it is, though, it IS -
How can man get a better understanding of the intentions of Universal Mind so that his choices would increase the development of his consciousness in a purposeful direction?
The intentions of U.M. are the intentions of man - he determines his own conscious 'development' (or lack thereof)!
So, how am I if asked, going to demonstrate U.M.'s concern for man?  I would have thought U.M. would have more concern.  If parents didn't offer anymore concern by lack of guidance than this, we'd call them irresponsible or indifferent.
Would he?  Or would he be thought to have instilled in the child the freedom or independence to make his own choices without supervision?
Touche.
How does a parent know when to acquiesce to their children's choice?
If the parent is aware enough to realize the child has a choice - he will gracefully accept the transition.  If the child knows and the parent doesn't - there will probably be a 'power struggle' also known a the generation gap!  That's part of being a parent - growing up enough to realize your youngsters have to make their own choices - it may be painful to watch as they make mistakes but they must have their own experiences!   It is sad when you finally realize they aren't your babies anymore, dependent, and trusting everything to you.  James, - this emotion is the most common one associated with seeing your children grow.  It cannot remain static and you must give away love to have it back.  By allowing them their ultimate freedom (choice) you give them more than you can know ten-fold in respect - admiration and imitating your life - the ultimate COMPLIMENT!  If you do all their 'fending' they must, at some later time, learn as you have.  The importance of enjoying with your mate is that you have both earned a certain stature in the incarnation by previous works and deeds.  You deserve a respite from your worries and those whom you are worrying for are quite able to do their own deeds and earn their own marks of accomplishment.  I believe that parents tend to be protective of their young, long after the need is exorcised in youngsters.  To try to shelter all the 'helpless young things' when you feel they have a need dilutes your effectiveness with your own growth.  Their reason for having such encounters are that they might learn to overcome their own weaknesses.  If you so easily take over their quest, they are willing to enjoy their leisure and delay until a later date - the growth and wisdom that comes with 'facing the music' on one's own two feet.
It's difficult to know how to introduce these ideas to a child.  Should children be taught to meditate; taught choice - destructive or otherwise?
The question is relative to those involved.  The naps vs. meditation are 'moot' questions for a time - babies 'sleep' more than meditate - but then they have less to comprehend or shall we say less to reconsider.  
Destructive - physically?  That is an area of learned response.  Respect for others - and others' belongings is a basis learning period (I admit - oft over-looked) but quite simple to explain - early in a child's learning period - and then on - ingrained.  To teach a child to choose - or allow him to choose is probably the single most important part of one's life!  Then he doesn't have to go back over thirty of forty years of others' choices to know his own!
How do you deal with a child's reaction to structured education if as a child he is taught to seek enjoyment and choice?
I think in this case you are assuming that the child would react as you have - that it would be a shockingly different atmosphere.  Actually if the child is brought along from infancy with the self-reliance and awareness, he will not "freak out" with the confrontation of negativism.
If I were a parent again I would certainly pay more attention to introducing awareness, assuming of course, I had the comprehension of how a child's mind should be guided.  At this point in my life I can't imagine what their minds filter, accept or perceive.
That is the difficulty of learning to think as a child -
Do people generally relate a child's intelligence to his interest?
Yes - they love to see a child with sparkling wide eyes and bubbling enthusiasm - as long as he's quiet and not too obtrusive.
Is a parent responsible for finding something that does interest the child?
No.
Is the child expected to be bored with nothing provided him to do?
Until he finds his own interest - besides when a child is quiet and to all appearances doing nothing - he is probably the most creative, on his entire lifetime!  There is danger in trying to make a child 'DO SOMETHING' - 'BUSY HANDS ARE HAPPY HANDS' ETC., ETC., ETC.  Allow them the time to daydream - to fantasize - to imagine.  It's the basis of CREATIVITY!!  When children are allowed to learn at their own speed and in their own choice of interests - they are much more creative - happier and brighter.  Everyone has a niche - none are completely stupid!.

                           SPECIAL EVENTS   

Does U.M. prevail over all of infinity?
Universal Consciousness is infinity (we won't go into the far-reaching effects of that statement, James, but with a comprehensible explanation of infinity - I think this will suffice).  For now - let's not get too far afield in these areas.  I'm trying to remind you of the essence of simplicity and you are trying to decipher man's whole existence!  This could be a 'contest' - if we were to allow it!
Does U.M. ever thrust its notions on mortals?
You present the 'problem' to the U.M. - it in turn, gives you one solution to the 'problem' - if that is not acceptable, another can be rendered.
So, it's the intent of U.M. to answer our questions so that we may fulfill the pleasures of sensory stimulation?
Yes!  Once the choice is made - we do all we can to insure fulfillment of whatever you have chosen.
You mean to say our guides have a part in the "act" and can assist in the outcome?
I should hope so!  We are what you might call lobbyists for your "cause."
To whom do you lobby?
Within our "strata" of Universal Mind -
Do you perceive me, viewing my thoughts truthfully enough, to enable you to be "politically" active as a lobbyist for my cause?
Not exactly - James.  Many of your thoughts are in conflict with one another.  Of course, I can enter your deeper levels, but I certainly would not be presumptive enough to interpret what I read in you thoughts.  We see what you believe and expect and perhaps we go along with what we do not necessarily agree with - to a point - where perhaps we may choose to intervene - to save much time and perhaps effort - and so you see?  I am you guide, not your 'leader.'  I am willing to help you with your 'lesson' but never make a decision for you.  My suggestions are for your growth and discern them as you will - they are only  suggestions.  Never orders.
Are there questions I might ask that would prolong knowing my true thoughts?
There are some things which will not serve to make you grow and learn but you may still question "all that is."  
You may not receive answers to all your questions.  I will guide you.  All is relative, however, some things are not useful to you.  You are progressing nicely with your questions now.
OK, here are some questions I know won't serve my learning but the answers could stimulate some.  Amelia Earhart - where did her plane crash and was she captured?
Her plane was not crashed - only lost power and landed in the sea.  She was recovered but did not live to tell of it. She was badly "exposed" to the elements and never regained consciousness.
By whom was she rescued?
Fisherman who knew nothing of her fame and her flight.  They were frightened to have become involved and quelled the story when they realized she would not (and did not) regain consciousness.
So, they just dumped her body in the sea?
Yes, they did not want to be accountable for a dead body when they returned from their foray at sea.
What nationality were the fishermen?
Japanese - and fishing illegally?
Where were they fishing illegally?
Too near another's' territory.
What could you tell me about the Siberian explosion of June 30, 1908 or otherwise known as the "Tunguska Mystery?"  (This explosion flattened a five hundred mile square section of Siberian forest).  What caused the explosion?  (Re: Readers' Digest - February 1978, THE FIRE CAME BY - The riddle of the great Siberian explosion condensed from the book by John Baxter and Thomas Atkins).
The explosion was underground gas wells detonated by an 'early edition' 'nuclear' bomb.  It was very experimental and many involved had no idea what caused the explosion - (a mistake but interesting after-effects).
Who designed the bomb?
It was not designed in this plane - those who were working on a similar project were startled by its detonation for they thought they were perfecting when in reality it was a 'gift' from others, already perfected but destroyed before they could analyze it.
Were humans in Siberia working on a similar bomb?
In that area, there has been a concentration of experimenters - analysts - thinkers for some time.  It is a highly regarded notion (and ultra secretive) that many highly intelligent persons concentrating on one subject (without distraction - i.e. sunshine - fun - frivolity and the like can perfect an idea in a much shorter period of time than in "normal - competitive" circumstances.                                                                                                     Is it still continuing?
Oh yes - not quite so secretively now.  But still - very concerted efforts at problem - solving with little or no distractions for so-called normal diversions.  This is the basis for what we consider 'Think Tanks' (without our - considered - necessary - comforts).  There is much suicide and mental disarray in that area.
This is it as I understand it so far: an atomic bomb had been designed - had or was being transported here as a gift from entities on another plane to some Siberian recluses and exploded or destroyed (accidentally or purposefully) thus setting off gas wells before the recipients, sitting in their think tank, could analyze it.
I believe you have just about hit the 'nail on its head' - as the events impact was on the scientists.  A misfortune - for at the time it was meant as an educational gift - not meant for the destruction (the design) later incurred.  It was too much - too soon!
So, this isolated "think tank" made contact with entities elsewhere who decided to provide the scientists with their request?
Not a direct contact but enough that the entities (from elsewhere) knew their goal was to perfect a device that could create great energy with only the most basic ingredients. The area was perfect for secretive experiments and relatively barren of natural resources which might otherwise have been used - coal - lumber - metal. There was gas (petroleum) available and cold temperatures - suitable for isolating nuclei masses and changing their charge.
Then the bomb wasn't transported from outer space?
Yes it was - the scientists had the basic plan but had not perfected the design - the others were bringing to them (the scientists) a prototype.  Not a bomb but a device which could harness nuclear power/energy.  The explosion was caused by a miscalculation in their entry and detonated (quite far from the "Think Tank") to save much destruction in a populated area.
Were the entities from our galaxy?
A little known area, outside this galaxy but not too far removed from a general similarity of planets (atmosphere - intelligence).  It might have - if delivered intact - changed the course of Earth's development.  Ah well - the 'good' will eventually be recognized and used for development rather than destruction.
What did the scientists have in mind for this power and didn't the entities know of its proposed use?
The proposed use was for development of areas - vast areas - as the arctic regions - tundra - so on - for heating - irrigation - and life - supporting technology.  The offshoot was a nuclear bomb to scare the poor underdogs into submission!  The 'Americans' and other so-called civilized nations are not exactly as they appear (on the surface).
Were they secret because the scientists were operating within Russia on a private scale?
The scientists were of many nations and co-operating on a purely scientific level.  Secret because of the political gender of their respective homelands.  (As you will 'know' soon - science and discovery transcend such petty boundaries as national policy).
Was Einstein involved, as this was the time he was considered up and coming?
Not directly involved, but he was co-operative in some of the research.
Who were some of the well known scientists that were actually involved?
As today - scientists are not well-known.  The experimentation led to some later (unrelated) discoveries.  The mathematics particularly exceeded known theorems of the time.  The group was quietly disbanded and most were not heard from again (in this plane) however, the basis of the successful nuclear 'harnessing' was formulated within that group.
Coal - lumber - metal - isolating nuclei masses and changing their charge?  Could you explain?
The coal - lumber and metal were in short supply, thus an alternative method of energy had to be found.  The source was 'harnessing' electrical impulses or better yet - nuclear reaction - Only an experiment at that time, but finally successful.
Now that's what I call a "far out" way of being provided a choice.
James - each chooses his circumstances and his victories or failures.  Those involved were very gratified by - at least a sign - that they were not 'choosing' in vain.  They all had some special reward - if only passing this plane and joining their real 'compatriots' in another plane.  Their work is invaluable to man's present development of energy sources!
Are any UFO's in earths atmosphere here for a similar reason?
The UFO"S are venturing forth to gain their own knowledge (not a lot of which is available on Earth).  The few that take "specimens" are generally rewarded by some 'small-town red-neck' screaming his head off that he has been "hostaged" by 'little green folk' from 'outer space.'   Indeed!
Without advanced awareness this experience would be "hair raising."  Interesting thought.  I'd like to try it myself if I wouldn't be embarrassed by a social disgrace (generally located at the rear of one's trousers) accounted for by having the living hell scared out of me.  Are there any mortals they could benefit from?
If they were to choose you (for speculation) they would have their 'hands' full!  You would probably ask more questions than they and it would be a gamble to see who benefited most from the encounter.
Those questions did provide some unexpected answers.  I thank you for answering and not characterizing them as "sensationalisms?"
I now realize your genuine interest in some questions and therefore we can discuss almost anything.  The questions seem to run in colors - there are no 'black and whites' only gradients of those combinations.
What happened to you answer of "too soon" to many of my questions?
You are progressing quickly now.  In the beginning it was becoming rather tedious trying to explain some of the things that you were not yet ready to comprehend.
Do you give us more to learn as we develop and comprehend?
You state that as though I am a very demanding teacher.  To the contrary, James.  I will give you assistance in any areas that you desire to venture into but I'm not driving you too hard am I?
Quite the contrary.  Everything seems new and exciting.  At times I'm confused, however, because of the abrupt exposure your answers present to my unawareness.  They require thought adjustments.
James, the reason for my help in expanding your consciousness is to comfort you - never to confound you or confuse you.  There is, I hope, also a curiosity and a desire to go on opening up new avenues of learning.  If I am an unbearable taskmaster, you may of course choose to close our communication.  Do you so choose?
You know better than to even ask that question!  I just wanted it to be obvious to you how difficult it is for me to deal with the frustration of being so unaware and unable to "swallow" it all.
It is frustrating at times because it seems like there could never be enough time in which to learn all that can be learned but without divulging any BIG SECRETS.  I would like you to know that only in the beginning does it seem impossible - it comes much quicker and easier when you have mastered some very basic tenets (which you are in the stages of mastering at present).
I accept your vote of confidence as most meaningful.  I'm eager to progress more quickly than my demeanor suggests.
Then, my friend, we have struck a bargain!  It will be a most gratifying association I can assure you.
Will this guide/student association defeat our relationship?  When I learn what you have to teach, will you still provide guidance?
Never fear, James.  We are destined for a very long interesting relationship.  When you have learned all perhaps you can teach me a thing or two.  We shall enjoy our further friendship and I'm sure it will be meaningful enough for even your expectations.
I certainly do wonder what is yet to be understood.  How is one capable of considering the possibilities of future lessons and yet think as a child?
The 'yet to be' will be totally new and fascinating and as  a 'child' you will marvel at 'how much' - 'how vast' is this life and the knowledge available.  When you are as a child - you will know the secrets of the universe.  As long as you must have your mature - Ha Ha Ha - intuitions - you will be in the dark.  When you can become as a child - you will know the true feeling of mortality and thus - immortality.  It is not difficult if you just keep your mind open and enjoy - do not fear - knowledge.  You will have a never ending supply of wonderment.

LOOKING WITHIN   

Victor, are you still experiencing wonderment?
Yes!
Would you give me an example?
It would not have the same effect - a comparable example would be the wonderment you had at some of our earlier conversations and the ease with which we communicate.
You have mentioned that part of awareness is the ability of one to "look within."  Why is this so difficult?
Looking within is difficult for most persons because they cannot (or will not) take responsibility for their lives.  When they analyze their 'problems' they find it is not 'Cruel Fate' but their own choices (for whatever reason)??
So what I may interpret as my choice, others label "Cruel Fate?"
Yes, as most beginners do.  It is a traumatic realization after living with Fate for so long.
I find this insight interesting, rather than traumatic.  It better positions me to project positive possibilities, rather than think my existence is determined by happenstance as was the path of that dandelion seed we spoke of earlier.
An exceptional case, James.  Most persons find it disturbing.
Disturbing because of the lack of a prerequisite such as money, education?                                    
Choices are limited only by your own thoughts.  Your real education is within and there you have all the answers.
Why is this so difficult if it's just of matter of making choices and accepting them?  We all ought to be able to make a choice and be happy rather than bemoan an occurrence we labeled "Cruel Fate".
For some there must be gratification or reward before there is comprehension.  Some persons - like dogs - only learn by the reward system.  There are other examples of this behavior.
Why do people differ so much from Jesus whom you say has "seen enough miracles" and I assume gratification?
Actually quite different!  He had seen 'miracles' because he had the good grace to choose and to believe!  Others must learn first to choose then to believe in those choices - it is not so difficult.
What's not difficult - choosing or believing?
It is not so difficult to learn when you have once decided  (or chosen) to learn.
Not difficult if you are aware enough to know one has a choice and to believe in your choice.  Of course it's the old chicken and egg question - which one comes first - choice or one's ability to believe?  This, as you say, seems to depend more on reward than comprehension.
The most important is to know that you have a choice - after that your objective is the next most important - then lastly the "means to an end."
In the making a choice, what did you mean by saying Jesus had "the good grace to choose and to believe?"
He simply chose to rise above some very unnecessary human foibles and thus 'arrived at grace.'
With his awareness, he could accept the process.  I don't have the peace of mind associated with making a choice and believing in it to any extent.  There seems to be too much disparity between my reality and choice to accept this premise.
You will have the peace of mind when you complete some of your high-wire acts.  James, if you feel you must "struggle through difficulties" as you always have - it is your choice.  There can be much more enjoyable (and rewarding) excitement than hanging from 'cliffs' as you well know!  NOW! choose your circumstances there need be NO STRUGGLES!!  NO TRAUMAS!!  NO BATTLES!!  Just perceive HERE AND NOW  what you perceive as REALITY!  The KNOWING, however, has been more prevalent of late, has it not?
Yes, and why do I feel so touched by the small amount of grace I feel accountable?
This is what you've been seeking for so long - it's thrilling to experience the fruition of all your efforts.  And worth the time - eh?
Do we learn more than choice and belief on this plane?
Yes - you learn the steps I have mentioned - choice, belief, logic - creativity and reason but you have to go through all the steps before you perfect your lessons or can 'apply' them - use them!
When you discussed my learning steps when we first started our talks you described them as 5 yes, 4 yes, 3 yes...were you referring to these five steps?
The steps are the most important!  You will learn more from this foundation than most of what you have learned in this entire life span.
Aren't we applying choice and belief now without having learned all the steps?
You are beginning to use them - it is like beginning to use drumsticks - you learn the basics and then you practice, practice, practice, practice, practice, eventually you may teach others - or help them to learn the basics - then you begin to create your own rhythms, routines and may actually create a whole new 'school' of drumming.  Do you see?
So once one begins beating his own drum the need for additional incarnations is eliminated, eh?
Yes, if you choose to learn your steps all in one lifetime.  A busy one!
What choices should be made so we can grade ourselves to eliminate additional incarnations?
No grading, James!  We all have a series of steps to learn - emotions to experience, choices to make - when you complete the required list - you are finished with physical incarnations - there are other stages that we must pass through, too, on our way 'up.'  It is a complex journey - but ah so simple when you once get the 'hang of it.'  (So they tell me)!
This whole process reminds me of the story of Tom Sawyer.  He knew there was a way out of the cave - his only trouble was, while in total darkness, he couldn't figure out which tunnel to take to escape.
You have a point, James, but the choice must be made.  If it's wrong, we can always go the other way or continue on the first path thinking (determinedly) that it will become right.  The only choice is to choose - then see where the chips fall.
But you said if you choose that is exactly what you get.  Your last comment reminds me of a man who chooses a new, twin diesel, motor sailer - the chips fall - and he winds up with a paddleboard.
The point is not the same at all!  When he chooses that boat, he will get exactly that (if he could make a decision at all)!  But that may affect his wife, children, his job surroundings (that is what I mean by let the chips fall).  He may not be home as much with his wife, so she may choose a lesser boat, or no boat at all and dissuade him from his original choice.  That is what I mean by choose and let the chips fall - not choose and see what your surprise will be.  No surprises!  Exactly as you choose (and keep your decision in that area).
Choosing (just choosing) seems insufficient - to accomplish anything.  (I disputed, that if what I had done in my life hadn't produced what I expected, simply choosing wasn't going to get me anywhere).
You need NOT be idle James, just choose what to do first!  The greatest problem most persons have with this (new) way of life is believing how very simple it is (when you can allow it to be)!  Just let it flow!
Is it "the process" that allows some approaches, the basis of failure or excuses on which to rely?
Yes - in a way...If you choose (really choose) a 'happening' - it is going to happen no matter how difficult you may be able to make it - in other words, in spite of - all the resistance that you have to your own decision.  The things you choose to be barriers - are - those you don't, are not!  That is all.  It is not always easy to know what is your own choice and what you have 'accepted' as your choice.  James, you are developing - how many times need I remind you of this.  You need only simplify, and as I have said be as a child, and you will gain your ideals.  The most important words I can relate to you now are relax, reflect, and recall your thoughts, dreams and inner emotions.  Do not concentrate on 'our problems' (presuming that you have problems which you do not)!!  Love your life (and your love) and live your love.
It just seems I can't have chosen better, clearer, harder, more determined, with more visualization, interest, intent, need, honesty, etc., but...?   Where are the results?
Choose!  That is all.  Do not make it work - let it happen, James!
Does the concentration on doubts and problems deter the manifestation of choice?
Your choice - but now it's hard to have doubts about them not manifesting (if you realize your motives).
Motives?  I'm still trying to figure out if I've made a true choice  - now motives - another cup of sand to plug up the gears, eh?
No, I'm just trying to help you see why some things have not while some others (more forgettable) have.
Is this a case of admitting the true motive or expecting a manifestation only if one has an "honorable" motive?
The motives are only your TRUE THOUGHTS - James - honor or dishonor is only your interpretation of your thoughts  (but we are starting to bring out some thoughts - yes)??  The emotion gives it SPARK - electricity (if you will).  Just makes it more 'forward' in your mind.  Desire - love - pride, etc. - these are the 'emotions' that CHARGE AN AFFIRMATION.
If you just wouldn't make it seem so simple.  My life seems more like a struggle than a choice.  If it had been easy my results would seem less justified.
Now there is a paradox - okey.  Your choice.  James, it is impossible, immoral and unrewarding for you to make those choices.  Not to mention cheap thrills!
Real funny!  I'll tell you one thing; when my lights go on with this one you'd better be standing back and wearing your sunglasses, Dude!.
I'm always prepared, James.  Go ahead!  Try to dazzle me!
My, my, my...how did man (including me of course) get so far removed from something so simple as making a true choice?
The 'Earth' plane has long been recognized as an adversity that many choose in which to learn their 'adverse lessons.'  If it were - as my plane - one could not have such adversity in which to grow - and overcome the odds!
In your words then, earth is designed, for our benefit, to be a little "screwed-up."
Not a little - James - totally!  The relief you see (feel - know) is of your awareness of other planes to come!
If earth is an adversity, what is the next plane (up) supposed to teach us?
What do you choose?  It can be 'heaven or hell' (which is where most mortals received their impressions of other planes).  It will be as you choose!  Rest - introspection - busy-ness - teaching - analyzing - whatever you choose.
Do you mean the next plane is relative, in nature, to how we've felt about life on earth?
If you think this is heaven - are you in for a surprise!  The thoughts of 'heaven or hell' were ancient stories - handed down generation by generation and somewhere along the way lost the true meaning of the analysis.  This plane (Earth) is a testing ground - an experiment in living!  The rest is more than you can imagine or I can explain!  
Not even within your grasp of understanding!
If choosing is so simple why would man generally admit he has received the adverse of what he would have chosen - and with so little effort?
A choice is exactly what he gets!  The 'adverse' is what he has chosen.  A challenge - a quest - the impossible - these are the results of his choice (and he gives up to what he says he has chosen because it is not always the ('seemingly') normal - ordinary choice).
Isn't this idea of choice, as you present it, a little "idealistic?"  There seems to be a paradox in that children, without being pushed, will (choose) consume enough candy to rot out their little teeth.  It's strange that man can't (choose) take the same attitude and go for what they want - with better results of course.
The parallel is good, James, however 'man' has become so attuned to "listening to the Sirens" that he does not choose, he is only 'conditioned, directed or manipulated' to a course via a temptation or ???
It's difficult to get aggressive about discovering my true choice because it may not be recognizable.  It's a catch 22; attempting to discover something that doesn't seem to exist.
Yes, it's the same as reading a chart and by all calculations, you're in one spot, but your guts tell you another - the fog is thickening and what do you do?  You'll soon be able to reckon better than shooting all the stars in the skies and you will know when you've got it.  The questions will probably help - at least in stirring up your "reckoning sense" but when it comes - it's like a warm rain in the tropics out of nowhere it comes and then it disappears without you knowing its start or end.
It's difficult to understand how we'll ever gain the faith to choose something that we presently perceive is unattainable, unavailable, unimaginable and completely satisfying.
That faith is built upon gradual steps of choosing and experiencing the confidence of each success.  List your TRIUMPHS - some are so grandiose - at the time - and so FORGETTABLE - when completed!  It takes some time but is surely worth the effort!  The "smaller" choices (and manifestations of 'reward') prepare the way for belief' in larger (or more abstract) choices (with 'reward' but perhaps not as tangible).  The natural instinct is to choose and to believe in your choice - because the statutes of society dictate one's limitations - does not mean he has to accept them - there are no limits (except in you own creativity).  One need not look to the past to remind us of our naiveté.  There was a time when you could not believe you had a control over your own life (in all facets) not just the physical.  This is a big step to overcome and when it is done - the rest is easy!  Onward! (and outward)!

                           THE OFFENDED   

This suggestion of yours, CHOICE, is going to be a difficult one for society to accept.  Their first impression on hearing this advise will be, "Well, if it's that easy I'll have some of this, one of those - give me it all!"  What's the limiting factor?  What's to limit me?
The factor is that when you realize the choice - you only choose that which will truly satisfy you!  You will know by your happiness, joy, contentment and mirth.  If you feel closer to your lessons and the (milestones) achievements - you will feel more confident about continuing with new enthusiasm.  It eliminates gluttony - greed - envy and so on.
So many of my experiences in life are so opposite from what I believe I would have chosen it's almost embarrassing to reflect on them as a result of my choice.  Conversely, it's difficult to understand how I could have been more intentional to create more enjoyment.
James, we are not always proud of our choices or happy with the outcome, but they are our choices, never the less!  You cannot accept responsibility for choices that have hurt others (or they seem to have hurt as a result of your decision - not so - their choice).  This is a great change from your previous thinking of "everyone else is 
more important so I will sacrifice for wife - children - parents - friends - enemies and so on."  Then you sit and wonder why everyone has stepped on your broad back?  Your only 'problem' (and not really a problem anymore) is you are too concerned with the effects of a choice on others and procrastinate somewhat because of that.
Would you care to give me an example?
Would you care to have one?
Yes!
Recently you exerted a choice concerning your daughter.  It took a lot of painful encounters to finally make a choice and make her aware of it.  Then you had some second thoughts and almost apologized to her for you own choice.  It was difficult and for the betterment of your life but it was painful and seemed almost not worth the effort.  But that, James, is an example of how our decisions can affect us and our friends and family.  Not always a clear-cut-simple choice.  Much is involved and the choice is not always black or white - right or wrong.
Wouldn't another name for this attitude be characterized as inconsiderate?
Your choice may not always be satisfactory to all involved but their choice is not always to you satisfaction either!  You choose - that is all!
What's the difference between doing what one wants, although it may be considered selfish or self-centered, or doing what one wants simply because it's his choice?
A choice may appear to be 'self' intentioned, however, it does question the ramifications to others involved.  One reviews the factors and chooses.  Self interest is a far cry from self-centeredness.  Selfish in the vernacular is a choice at the expense of others.  Subtle difference but noteworthy.
You described foibles as harmful and include thoughts of greed, jealousy, envy, covetousness etc.  Assume these acts are our choice - not all necessarily at the expense of others.  Would they therefore be wrong, sinful, harmful?
The only thing 'harmful' is that it detracts from your awareness.  The only text in which I would use the words sinful/wrong/bad/harmful etc. are those areas where an act or idea - not only does not contribute - but also detracts from your own growth and development.                                                                                                                   (You may want to remember the preceding because should you expound the merits of CHOICE you are going to be ridiculed by others whose logic concludes that chaos would be the only result).
Where others are concerned - your actions toward them are your choice so nothing is right or wrong.  You cannot compromise your choice to save another's heart break.  Only their attitude toward the choice can make it seem 'right or wrong' to them.  It has nothing whatsoever to do with your choice.  Do not be concerned with others' 
reactions to you decisions.  Be aware that people will try to obligate you and compromise you via your attachments of family, love and caring.  There is much to concern yourself with besides others' selfish reactions.  You do not have to seek 'approval' from others.  The oppressor is yourself - one cannot be victimized without one's own interpretation of victimization - thus one allows it OR NOT!  No one else determines your choices - only you!  If someone else 'partially determines' it is because you have chosen to allow it!  (Which doesn't say much for your choice to begin)!  You know what is right for you - also you can now accept YOUR CHOICE!  A comforting thought, is it not?
Yes.  If I reflect on how complex this segment of mortal life can get and the inter-related complexities, choice does seem to be a comfortable, common denominator for an equitable "law and order" approach to the scheme of things.
It is interesting to note that even with the common denominators each has a unique approach to accomplishing the same end.  I believe you have 'discerned' this in many persons of late whom you have tried to 'help along the way.'
(This answer prompted me to think of Mina, and old friend of mine who a week before had come to visit my ex-wife and had stopped by to say hello to P and me.  She detailed her displeasure and turmoil of life as a result of her daughter's discovery late in life of her adoption, resulting in a move to grandmother's house.  Following this were a couple of divorces - an inconsiderate male companion - a manipulative employer and little personal fulfillment as she continued her life by engaging her only spare moments caring for her ailing mother.  Mina gave me the impression of being and exhausted personality.  I mentioned to her the contact we had with our guide; explained how she might benefit and asked if she might like to ask him some questions.  With her acceptance of my suggestion, I introduced Victor).
Good afternoon, my dear.  It is indeed my pleasure!  I feel you are seeking and the material presented is of interest to you so let us waste no time - questions please, dear! (and I might add - high time to do something for YOURSELF)!
(Mina couldn't think of questions on the spur of the moment so I loaned her a book I thought would culture meaningful questions at our next encounter which I planned around a dinner at our house the following day.  We prepared the dinner but the time came and went without Mina, a phone call or the return of my book.  I asked Victor the following question).  So, what happened to my old friend, Mina?
An unfortunate situation - she was torn between genuinely seeking help for herself and allowing others to sway that seeking through sympathetic gestures - PATHETIC would be more to the point.  Disgusting - but it was her choice to make.
Now that she will return to the doldrums, do you think it will ever dawn on her that she may have utilized the assistance of less valuable "comfort zone" on her visit to California?                                                                                                                         She is far from realizations of her own shortcomings - she will take a bit longer to realize that immediate 'comfort' does not change the root of discomfort - it is a long way off for her.
If a person has made choices, how can he assure himself that he's on a cold, warm or hot path, or on track at all?
The most important is how YOU feel about your choices.  If they are productive - interesting - provocative for YOU they are on the way to fruition.  If it is YOUR CHOICE and you truly, thoroughly, want, need and expect it to happen, occur, materialize, you can bet your boots, it WILL BE!
Is this awareness?  Sometimes I reflect on it is a catch-all for anyone who does not see things as unpleasantly as I.
Awareness does not mean agreement to the 'norm' or any particular behavior, for one can be aware and still do stupid things.  Awareness is discernment.
What's your suggestion to eliminate doing "stupid things?"   (I sat at my desk writing the last question and reflected on my last stupid "problem" or that event instigated by happenstance or coincidence.  By honestly searching I got the answer - I was the creator - again!  It had to do with a tenant paying by check and having his check bounce.  In spite of the fact he had first contracted to buy the house, only then suggesting he'd like to rent until the close of escrow, should have made no difference.  We'd been in real estate for twenty years.  We had seen all the con jobs to enable one to become an illegal tenant.  Discernment should have made us say, "You bet pal...no problem...where's the cash?"  We didn't even clear the check with the bank and it cost dearly.  Now, do you have anything you want to admit to having created because you were not discerning)???
Just by looking at the situation with discernment.  Not trying to impress or appease others - make you own choices!  That is the key!
You keep using the word choice like it's something I haven't heard.  Is there a difference between choice and decision?
In a choice you determine the circumstances - a decision is based on the circumstances. A very slight nuance.  (In the above example of discernment, concerning my tenant, isn't it now crystal clear who determined the circumstances and who made the decision - and who lost)?  How about an example to clarify this?
The examples could be lifestyles as a nun - a petty officer in the navy - a "cotton" picker or diplomat.  They are all involved in predetermined circumstances.  Some where and obvious choice is made would be a hiker in a forest, a free-lance photographer - a international spy like James Bond etc.  There is a difference between choice and accepting whatever comes along - would you rather be 'acceptable' or exceptional?
Why exceptional - I've been without dazzling results too long.  Ha Ha.
Yes - you already know your 'acceptance quotient' in some quarters -  It is not easy to be exceptional but oh so very rewarding.  Again, my only suggestion is to be true to your own feelings, not others.  Your decision is for your further development.  You do not hurt others, they hurt themselves by their own decisions.  Do what you feel is best for your own personal growth.
Where is the happy medium of discernment and being able to have friends, mates and relatives who will accept this attitude of awareness associated with one's choice?
You will not reach a happy medium in this regard.  If others do not accept your ideas and methods, so what?  It is only one path of many that can be taken.  Others may not choose the same path but eventually will reach the same destination.  You have been aided in some steps on your pathway because you sought answers and awareness.  Others may be hindered because they cannot accept the truth, even when they meet it head on.
The idea of trying to 'please' everyone goes back to much earlier training and feeling it was your duty to be polite and amuse and entertain everyone.  Not your forte now!  You will not offend persons who know their own worth and the worthiness of their decisions - and so only the unaware - and perhaps before too long, you will not have to contend with them - you will be in a position of control over your environment rather than adapting to it.
Remember you too have a choice - not to be offended.  It is a good lesson and most enlightening when you "get it."
Would it be advisable, in the meantime, to react toward those "injustices" against us as dispassionately as we react to the injustices of man in such places as Bosnia and Rwanda?
There is a tendency to take some things more personally James - though they are as 'incapable' of solution (by ordinary methods) as social injustices of the world.  You are now at a point in your learning where you will also realize that (now that you know they are making their decisions) it will be much easier for you to make your decisions and not experience seizures of guilt, anxiety and jealousy.  It is a pleasant state in which to be but it is a bit difficult in the beginning to understand, how allowing others to make their own choices gives you your freedom.

                                  CRIME   

You say choose what is right for you and that there will be no offense to persons who know their own worth.  Didn't Charles Manson have a similar attitude?  They certainly had a tact of controlling their environment, didn't they?  In fact, wasn't that the premise on which he persuaded his followers.  I'm concerned people reading this may regard your suggestion as a similar situation.
There are, of course, some similarities in every 'way of thinking' - one should feel free in this plane to exercise his choice - because some do that to the detriment of others (and society in general) does not make that RIGHT (CHOICE) a wrong - the ultimate in a peaceful - happy co-existence is when each chooses and is allowed his freedom to make that choice -
I'm having a very difficult time, regardless of my preconditioning, to passively accept that society or an individual should view Manson as a person who just "exercised his choice."
The answer may seem very 'pat' but it is his choice - the  followers, their choice - the 'victims' their choice.  It is not a matter of what we would choose in their circumstances but what they HAVE chosen.
Sure, and if this book ever gets to print you won't have to be the one to answer the letters!  Now are you about to tell me they shouldn't have to go to jail or be hanged?
They have also chosen their imprisonment - their nightmares - their demise and as we all have - the next incarnation to 'balance' these deeds.
So, what's the point of employing a police force if it's all preplanned by those who choose to kill and get killed - those that rob and those that choose to get robbed?
Does having policeman or any other 'security' force eliminate the problem?  That is like saying 'if we build enough WEAPONS there will be peace!'  How very naive!  Indeed!
Perhaps not eliminate but there is a definite decrease of crime and traffic deaths attributed to properly staffed police forces and enforced driving laws.
The statistics are not valid - if there were less (EVER) why do the national and international continue to climb?  The more regulation the more 'crime' - but that of course is relative to what one considers a crime.
Looting?
Distribution of goods -
Stealing one's property??
(I was making a joke there.  Stealing is considered very tactless by most in all planes - that, however, lessens when the 'average' man chooses to have his 'fair' share of 'all that is' (not ONLY material goods).
You mean by eliminating all law enforcement there would initially be some stealing, robbing, rape, looting until the average man had satisfied himself or just chooses enough for himself?
Yes - that would be the overall picture - it is so in many planes and will eventually be on Earth plane as man finds new challenges to occupy his time and excess energy.  This is not in the very DISTANT future.
When we first started talking you said the process "eliminates violent expression."  Will man attain equanimity without prefacing it with violence?
There will always - eventually - be a balance.  In man's present 'state of mind' there would - of course - be chaos and violence and confusion - first - but is that not prevalent NOW?  When each takes responsibility for his own life - his own choices and his own development - there is NO disruptive action.  It all soothes into a nice soft jell - rhythmic - warm - copacetic.  He 'KNOWS' that all things are equal - balanced - complimentary that IS - what IS!
When you first mentioned "violent expression" my interpretation was a revolution by the underprivileged taking from the privileged as a means to equanimity.  (My impression of what Bill Clinton has in mind).  I now interpret it meaning that if we each knew our choice and chose, there would be no need to steal, rape and plunder for another's possessions.
There's a choice for everyone - if they choose OPPRESSION - they will be beaten down - if they choose FREEDOM - concrete walls cannot enslave them - you are getting the drift.
I get the drift and still think a large segment of our population, called whackos, still need to have their choices limited.
The 'limits' are 'limitless' - in a truly FREE society - each respects the others choice, allows him the ultimate freedom and takes his own freedom.  It is the only 'feasible' way to survive on this plane.
Would this, by itself, eliminate crime?
If the word crime was eliminated, we'd all be better off.  The real crime is not allowing oneself the CHOICE.
I understand the truth of such a suggestion but feel as though it best if someone else starts the process - I'll follow when I see someone else gaining all this awareness.  In the meantime I feel more comfort from limiting those who would rather, without my approval, swap my hubcaps for a "joint."  Answer this question please: it was determined the recent fire in Santa Monica Hills, California was arson.  In your mind was a crime committed since all he did, by your analogy, was to fulfill the choice of those who wanted their homes, pets and possessions torched?  "Thank you sir for burning my house to the ground - I never did like it...mortgage too high...and that damned cat the kids adopted..."
In my eyes, he did not but -- man has distorted 'justice' from the beginning of 'civilization.'  Before then, it was quite evident to all concerned - who or what was 'right' because it often came down to life or death choices.
That takes us back to what is - IS!
Exactly!  You are catching on, James.  Congratulations.
Catching on?  You must be grading on a bell curve with me being the only guy in class.  Anyway, I thought you'd categorized theft as a crime?
There is a generally accepted axiom in the Universal Mind that thievery is very base.  It is not a law or even a crime but it is just considered very tacky!  That includes possessions, time and honor.
Killing someone via a fire, purposely set, seems to be well within the sphere of taking a lot of a guy's time...not to mention the cat!
If he has chosen to be in that particular place at that particular time - and there is no such thing as a "VICTIM"  to the Universal Mind - these would be considered willing 'participants' ("consenting adults" - same insinuation -)
What differentiates "consenting adults" from victims of theft or stolen honor?  Based on your belief the theft wouldn't have occurred without it being the victims choice and again encompassing what is - Is.
The thievery is tacky (in the opinion of the U.M.) this does not preclude it from happening, though.  It is all a part of what IS but this does not "seemingly" teach anyone anything.
I have a real difficult time understanding how murder is a "clean" (educationally) and thievery is a "dirty."
James, - it is difficult to understand with your present 'reason' and 'logic' - you have been conditioned socially and racially to detest murder but "in the case of patriotic duty" or an abortion it's OK or it's okay if you are protecting your 'own home' - 'your family' or 'your life."  Why is that OK and relieving another of his anguish -'dirty?'
Are you saying you reached the state of development when if pushed from a sailing ship by a thief you would have said while drowning, "I'm a consenting adult and thanks a lot for relieving me of my anguish?"
Now - but certainly not then.  In fact, I pushed a few of them - over - to save my own neck.  It was worth it - to me.
Why didn't you have another incarnation if you didn't learn this lesson while on the playing field?
While there, I learned all my necessary lessons.  The idea of murder never entered my head - it was 'pure logic' that in order for me to survive - some of them had to go - nothing personal you understand?
Oh sure!  It's crystal clear now!  Seriously, how can you suggest eliminating thoughts of envy, covetousness, greed and be so blasé about murder?  We're back to thinking of murder for revenge as a "no no" but murdering as "OK."
If you perform the murder and have no other thoughts about it.  If once the deed is accomplished you do not think of why you did it.  What will happen as a result of it and instead of relieving the revenge - retribution etc., etc., it only replaces those thoughts with regret, remorse, guilt.  Then the act is 'wrong' because it does not alleviate the circumstances - only adds to the 'problems.'
Is this a lesson we are expected to learn on this plane or on a more developed plane?
Some - not all, for there are many more pleasant lessons - are there not?
My God, let's hope so!  How are mortals expected to learn lessons so diametrically opposed to preconditioned beliefs of their society?
Through you lives on this plane, you learn the sensory lessons.  Through lessons on other planes, you learn the sensitive.  The 'crimes' you are discussing do not have to be experienced to understand.  The 'crimes' are delineated only by mans' definition that they are 'crimes.'  When you look at them 'logically' though you can see what or who is 'protected' by such man-made laws and whether or not they fit the 'logic' of the Universal Mind.

                              LIMITATIONS   

Is the judgment one makes of himself after death based on how well he really understands his mortal lessons?  Could it also be stated that the more righteous man becomes the more difficult it will be to escape reincarnations?
The conclusion is quite accurate - you and only you will pass judgment upon yourself - at that time (with your real logic and reason) you will probably understand why you did everything you have done in your life and why there is no reason for guilt, remorse and so on.  If only persons could understand while in a mortal state - there would be much less distress in that plane.  As for the "righteous" - most of their zeal seems to be 'guilt' (for what)?? 
Just about when I feel I have an understanding of what you're saying and how it applies a new irony erupts.  For instance, we just saw a program depicting the "Boat People."  Firstly, they seek what I take for granted: freedom.  Secondly, after the trouble they have gone through to gain freedom it would appear they would have made a choice, but instead many are washing on shore dead.
Yes - it is IRONIC!  Sad but true that what they have chosen is the pathetic life they are living - some of course, will triumph (those that choose) and many others will die in the trying.  As a rule, James, we live as we choose - if we choose -
It would appear to me that those that escaped Vietnam or Cuba on a boat have already made the choice to survive and attain freedom.
They have chosen to escape - not all will accomplish the survival and freedom. There is a distinction, James.
Are you saying it has to be that specific?
Yes - VERY SPECIFIC!
Are you attempting to tell me something?
Who??? Me???
Ok, let's say I choose to be the worlds heavyweight boxer at my age.  (Once again I was trying to disprove his teachings.  This would probably be the most unlikely choice I could ever imagine...having perfect recall of having run into the edge of a door one dark night on my way to the bathroom.  Fifty times that pain would not qualify as satisfying employment).
You can be whatever you choose - but consider very carefully a choice like boxing - it hurts and even the champ takes a beating!
Ok, let's say I'm 80 and choose to become a prize fighter.  You have to admit to us mortals that sounds impossible.
Hopefully by age 80 he has learned to use his wits rather than his fists to make his glory known!
The eventual wit really doesn't appear, until in the non mortal state, as a guide, it combines with side stepping a question, eh Victor?
'Use it or lose it' I always say -
So what would preclude such a choice?
Development does - not many smart young men choose boxing careers either - and those that have become known (as 'smart') get out as quickly as possible into some sane profession where they can use their physical prowess and notoriety to advantage.
So I can conclude that the process eliminates some things as a result of KNOWING they are impossible or in this case painful?
Yes of course - if it's a TRUE CHOICE it will manifest despite 'odds' and 'obstacles.'  If it's only a whim - it will not (as you know).
There's another one to look out for - "whimmers."  Let's eliminate whims and think of a guy that lost both arms who might choose a natural replacement.  (I'm beginning to hear myself sound like so many I talk to - "You'll never prove it to me."
If his choice and belief are TRUE - he will have it.  It may take some surprising turns, James.
In what way?                                                                                                                             The student may become a biomedical engineer and make himself a new part - he may become a transplant surgeon and add a limb from donation - or he could regress in time to a prior event and change the choice in the first place - or may progress to another time when 'he' is reincarnated whole again.
I mean a replacement as does the starfish...but this would come under the heading of KNOWING it's impossible.
I presume it could be done - with enough faith and the TRUE CHOICE.  Because it is not common among men does not preclude its occurrence.
While we're talking about common interest among men our inflation rate is horrendous.  It's been stated the only thing to save us is thrift and more productive work.  Any comment?  (This was a period in the early `80's when interest rates were skyrocketing in an attempt to quell inflation and economic debates were on the rampage).
CHOICE!!  Doesn't anyone ever think of choice??
What about the economists theory that population size determines those who will have and have not?
It is a pre-conceived idea and who will judge who produces and who abstains?  There is a much larger question here - and that is - Who cares??
Others say it is lack of enthusiasm in the work place and that it's an interaction of boredom in the work place to the economic conditions.
Persons are bored with others' choices being foisted upon them.  It is only a matter of choice.  Again, use it or lose it!!
What's your belief for the reasons of decreased productivity?
Who cares?  There is a glut on the market of inferior merchandise so those that choose get the best - the others get the rest!
Are you in favor of laissez-faire capitalism?
I believe in choice!  That is all...  Let the "mongers of woe" speak their piece - they will always be replaced.  Sad there are not more optimists than pessimists in such vocal positions.
What happens where there are opposing choices?  My son for instance wants to move back into his rented condo.  What if the tenant chooses to stay?
It is Greg's choice to make - either way. The tenant would have long ago chosen to own his home - not live at the whim of a LAND BARON.
(I trust the reader is convinced by now that I do not fully understand CHOICE and that it is my intent to wear the subject thin with Victor, who only infrequently, looses his cool - by choice!  Your saving grace is that I change the subject frequently).
This is all well and good but suppose a man has .10 cents and wants to buy a .25 cent candy bar?  
Then he has not made a choice - he has made a decision.  The price is not relevant to a true choice.  Costs are circumstances which one REACTS to - thus it is not a factor of choice.  He may not have his true choice at that moment - but if he has made a true choice - he'll go get .25 cents somewhere!
Should weight of the candy bar be a consideration of choice?
It would be a primary sensual consideration if one did not go on to relate weight to price or volume to calories etc.
What about nutrition and size of the candy bar?
Those are more likely also circumstances (pre-conceived notions).
What would be a choice in regard to a candy bar?  The reasons for buying are diminishing quickly.
The sensual choice - sight - feel (texture) - taste etc -
Just to cover all bases, could there be any sensitive choices involved?
The advertising may appeal to your sensitivity (but not likely).
So, all of our choices with material things should be concerned only with the sensual aspects?
Until you are ready to experience the sensitive!
You aren't implying we can experience material things sensitively, are you?
Don't get ahead of me James - this could get very involved in the next steps so let's leave it here for the time.  Just don't think of the NON-SENSUAL for now - we'll get into the other aspects as we progress.

                       MANIFESTING CHOICES   

Why do some choices seem easier to manifest than others?
Levels of involvement - degrees of interest. It is the priority which you determine that gives the sub (subconscious) a framework of importance.
I've made several choices lately and it seems that the results are taking inextricably long.  Reflecting on my past choices, or happenstance's as you may refer to them, my present ones are appearing more climatic by the moment.  How come?
James, it is not so unusual.  You have always been conditioned to think only of the limitations.  You are "getting it" do not fret.  Your past 'decisions' were more likely 'the lesser of the two evils' or how can I come out best in a losing game.  These decisions are very deliberate and exacting - thus the striving for perfection of each detail.  Just keep reading and rereading your affirmations - meditate and your 'SUB' will soon take over.  He is very powerful and you can give him more and more 'work' all the time for he thrives on it.
It seems like what I consider priority choices are being superseded by occurrences I don't want to admit taking "credit" for.  The best analogy I can make would be to choose to go to San Francisco and wind up in Waco, Texas.
Oh - not there!  Silva Land!                                                                                                                                        (He was referring to the Silva Mind Control classes we had just attended teaching meditation.  I would like to add here that the Silva Method of teaching is excellent for teaching meditation).
The choices are exactly what you have chosen - you are already aware of you interest to always prove a point - to make sure you have experienced all the emotions - tried all the angles. This does not SUPERSEDE your choice James - just not always goes along with your conscious choice of timing and actualization.
You say all mortals arrive at the same end.  Did you forget to mention how many of them get from point A to point B without experiencing all the wretched lessons?
Easily is the key word!!!  They may not have to have such dramatic results, James, such earth-shaking conclusions -  Simple is Better!!  Think as a child.  Let it flow!!!  You seem to have a lot of your father's characteristics - the 'value' depends on the battle.
Is it possible I'm choosing these experiences to enable empathy, when teaching, by being able to say, "I've been there???"
There is much to say for 'learning by example' and as you have observed it is easier to understand others' problems by having already gone through them.
The other motive I can't understand is why I choose such climatic lessons.
I think it is primarily for the 'value' of the 'ending.'  "You fought hard, and won" and so on - whatever's "worth it," is worth fighting for/working for/sacrificing for.  I suppose you have heard those remarks before?  James, if you 'knew it all' you wouldn't have the 'human touch' nor the compassion and empathy to teach.  It will come to you from time to time that there is yet so much to learn - but one cannot relay the learning without some communication (as being in the same boots)?
I also find it difficult to project myself as a teacher and being capable of answering others doubts.
You cannot be all things to all people - so do not feel inadequate in that area.  As they seek, they too will have answers - in their own way - not everyone will learn in the same way, you do.  You may provide the direction but they must make their own way.  You cannot take their lumps for them -  It will be a moot point because no one can ever believe you KNOW how they feel or what they are going through.  It's a bit frustrating to feel your hands are tied but you can't teach what they will only learn by experience.
You're right, I don't want to take their lumps.  Don't have enough ice for my own, thanks.  I would, however, like to learn and teach what instills the ability to choose without interim traumas creating doubt.
You will incorporate that in your teachings.  But it won't change the way most people learn - that is by experiencing!  
The case in favor of using belief, choice, faith and so on - is that YOU cannot personally be responsible for anyone 'else's' choice - faith - belief - therefore they must know they have a choice.  Too many people are caught up in 'security - responsibility and obligations' to realize they have a choice.
The most important - James is to keep it SIMPLE - and repeat it enough to arouse a little annoyance - it helps them to remember if they're emotional about it - even angry (to a certain extent).
Will people who seek find the comfort that we have?
In their own way - not all will have your same experiences so perhaps not as you see it.
I'm beginning to appreciate the value of experience but if you and I could develop some "smart pills"...we could speed this lesson along!
There is no substitute for experience though it can be painful - Remember it is also joyous! (at times)  When there is a pain - the source is usually elusive - it can seem to begin everywhere and you can seldom pin down the real starting point.
Can a person design a shortage in what he might otherwise claim to be his choice?
In your case with your cliff-hangers?  Obviously the answer is yes.
Are these shortages, choices made by the facet or entity?
Your own (facet) seems to have chosen cliff-hangers (up until NOW and I presume this will change)?
If I accept your opinion of having chosen to win battles, what possible motive could I have for choosing cliff-hangers?                                              
Your interest is in developing - then teaching - you have learned your lesson well and have even 'suffered' to get a few.  No one can say you haven't experienced the full swing of the pendulum - perhaps your methods demand the total involvement you have given them - dissecting every minute detail so you really KNOW.  Some, however, need not be so dramatic and I suppose it just a matter of finding that happy medium. 
 You seem to delight in dangling over the precipice by a thin wire and as the wire begins to unravel - the very last split second - you rescue yourself from a fate worse than???  I'm sorry to say your choices are all as you have chosen - perhaps (not all consciously) you choose to capitalize on how "hard" it has been FOR YOU - of course - there are other perceptions???  You choose your lessons, James, but you don't always have to choose the 'hardest' path.  You have always felt you must work HARD for everything - when things come too easily you are disappointed - ILLOGICAL but I suppose that is why you choose.  You are an example of choice - though you cannot see it at face value - you'll see it in retrospect - soon!  You just keep on choosin' -                                                                    
What can you tell me about my friend Chuck?  He's been down mentally from financial pressures and to add to his miseries his house was burglarized yesterday - stereo and other things stolen?
Sorry to say, but he has chosen (to fight all his 'battles' in one fell sweep)!  This in not uncommon.  His attitude will determine the outcome (or - at least - how he is affected by it)!
If I were Chuck, I would have doubts in my ability to effect a change of such an impoverished situation within the time (seemingly) allotted.  His situation would test "the best."
The time 'allotted.'  And what is that?  Does he have to follow past examples?  When you make a choice, does it depend on everyone involved concurring with your decision?  Just let it flow!!  You have already witnessed more grandiose decisions than this and yet you doubt?  Come, come, James - what is there but belief in you own choices!
I seem to understand one moment and am emotionally stimulated that choice is so powerful yet the next minute or day, however, my conviction wanes.  If everything, is originated by consciousness, and thus choice, why is it so difficult to make life anything less than a pleasure trip?
Absolutely!  One chooses each event - effect and changes it only by his choice.  We can easily slip into the complacency of allowing mass consciousness to make our decisions but (as we have witnessed) - that is certainly not the choice to make (hah! still a choice)!  Is choice without logic a true choice?  The interpretation you use for logic is to weigh all the aspects of a consideration.  In that case - one cannot make a true choice without logic.  Later, when you have progressed to the steps (beyond) you will have a different viewpoint of logic.  The senses will take care of the decision - just don't try to 'think it out.'  Allow your sensual responses to guide you.
Why is a true choice so difficult if it's a natural part of our being?
Because you aren't sure of the end results - if you'll be happy - when you haven't been with some of your other choices.  When you make this list (of choices) notice the things that are on the list!  Are they sensual?  Are they concerned with the hows? The steps to fruition are not really important to the end result... Unless each step is a choice.  Do you see?  One can arrive at a destination by many different routes - some may be more pleasant, languorous, or quicker and treacherous.  When you make a choice - (of an end result) your subconscious goes to work only on that choice - not taking into account the steps to it (the end result) may be illegal - dangerous - or otherwise unacceptable.  The end result will occur.  I will not "predict" when but the steps to it will be within your range of ethics and acceptability. 
 You should be concerned with you - you can choose your present conditions and each one that you choose - makes a step toward your future - for what after all, is the future?  It is only a composite of all the nows!  The immediate choice is what you will do with your list. 
First make you list!!  NOW!!!  That is the point James, of posting your affirmations - writing them out - taking pictures of material objects seeing it day after day - it is acclimating oneself to the idea and feeling worthy!!  The choice alone is what is part of a lifestyle.  The manifestations, though, add to the reinforcement of one's surety in his choice.
You say in the steps to fruition, the hows are not really important.  I find it difficult to choose to depart from point A and have a destination of point B without knowing HOW I plan on getting there.
There we are again - back to the finite details, beclouding every issue - trying to make it more than it is.  When you are able to really simplify - you will KNOW and it will be as you expect.  As I mentioned before - things will seldom if ever - happen as you picture them.  This includes the smallest to the largest of your details.  The end result is the only concern - unless of course one of the details is the end result which we already discussed.  Just choose - believe and allow it to happen.  Forget about HOW and just DO IT.  There is a simple solution to every question!!  Just keep on track - it is not so difficult and it does not question the 'hows.'
Is it possible to become more aware of where the 'flow' or what the sequence is?
It is possible in a sense because it does have a definite pattern - although it is probably not visible on a conscious level - and on the other levels - it doesn't matter because they are all concurrent anyway.  You don't have to DO anything in PURSUIT of them, however!  You will KNOW the FLOW!!  It goes back to having patience (and faith) in the perfect timing of all things.  The end result is the only part you must be concerned with - not the HOWS!!  That is taking the hows and justifying and end result.  It will probably never happen in the way your expect it to so pre-experiencing the HOWS may only cast doubt.  If you still worry about the HOWS - you will never get past choice - even to the second "1/2" of that - belief.
What is an event called that is preceded by first knowing the "hows?"
Just a result - not necessarily a choice but eventually a result.
A result of a choice?
If you have made a choice - yes - if it is only a result (where no choice - no conscious choice - is made) it is not a choice.
James - have we been so circumspect in these lessons to include unconscious and any other small niches as the wording of a sentence to change so much the meaning of choice?
Of course not.  So far it's like crystal clear water cascading over a mile high waterfall.  Patience, Victor.  I'll get it, "Sooner or later!"  If all of man's circumstances have been predetermined prior to his reincarnation, why such a big application of the lesson, choice?
There is always a choice - and one does NOT have to remain constant - it is ALSO a choice!
What keeps one from knowing his true choice - especially if it's no more difficult than basing it on sensuality?
You are influenced by extenuating circumstances - such as style, availability, gas mileage, price and so on!!  Will you compromise or limit your self?  Gasoline - price - mileage?  Where is you line of 'demarcation?'  If you are limiting (compromising) your choice because of gasoline - well - again YOUR CHOICE!  The only limitation is in your head - you may be a bit reluctant yet because of your previous training.
What happens when we chose for reasons other than sensual or true choice and acquiesce to something less?
You get a boat/car but you're still be looking for the one!!
There are times when I realize I almost have two identical but dissimilar choices.  What then?
That is when a choice - a true choice - is most important!  
There will always be instances when a choice seems impossible but one is the true choice - the other a compromise - ever so slight! 
I think you are admitting to yourself what you have known for some time.  There are some choices that may not be as 'clear-cut' as they first appear.  One will not "spoil the barrel."  You can choose to change a choice, you know!
I feel incapable of knowing my own true thoughts when I make a change in a choice that took me months to make or when I can't choose between contenders.
There will always be new temptations, James! Nothing remains static!  There is always something new - and if not better - different!  Count on it!  Your true choice may only last a few seconds before you make another.  Things will continually change your perception of what you consider primary.  Do you want to 'STICK IN THE MUD?' James - you will always change but always for the better - if you can only believe IT DOES GET BETTER!
You used the word, temptation.  How would you define a temptation, as a choice?
I would relate it the same way.  Temptation - deliberation - revelation!  A most orderly process!  Choices are delineated by "gut level" or true choices and superficial or reaction responses.  Some may be "anticipating" choices - as "by Christmas, we will have the book ready for publication" - or "for our next vacation I would like to have our new car."  Other's may be "non-time" choices as "I don't want to wear glasses - my eyes are much improved" - "I want to be more patient with Miss P"  and so on.  There are some that "improve" with anticipation - some that are "needed" RIGHT Now!!  
One can be aware of a true choice on a conscious level but it is not very common.  One usually suppresses true choices in favor of the expected response.  You are going to experience a lot of changes and it will be much nicer for you if you choose all of them - instead of just letting them happen to you!!
Does choosing become any easier or more plausible after a few "good" experiences?
Certainly easier as they become more familiar, plausible?  That is an interpretation of cause and effect.  You must first recognize where you are before you can pursue another path.  Where do you choose?  It is always your choice.  'Setbacks' are temporary!  As long as you choose - TRULY - then it shall be!  How or WHEN is of no concern!
I've got some choices that make me feel that I'll pass this plane before they occur...at which time they won't be true choices any longer. (As I edit this book years later I can't even imagine what those choices could have been).
If they last that long they would probably be TRUE but meaningless - and you will never STOP having affirmations - they will only change with your level of development.
What if all men would choose the same thing?
If only they would!  There would always be plenty for everyone (and of course all would not choose the same things).
What determines a persons selection of choices?  Why might I choose a boat and yet another person an airplane?
One chooses one's own perception of reality (or truth which is different for most everyone).
It is interesting how one mans accomplishments can be so uncherished or unappreciated by another... or even by himself.                                                                                                                  
Yes, it is paradoxical that one man's goal seems insignificant to another - or the value one places on development that another scoffs at.  There will be plenty of room to grow in your own way James, for others take many different paths.  There will never be 'crowds' on your path.
What can you suggest to increase the absorption rate of these lessons, thus enabling people to use them more successfully?
The absorption rate is directly related to listening - one's hearing can be perfect but he may not LISTEN!
Nothing personal, Sir James, but listening is not a universal "best" seller.  Most people hear quite well and go right on their merry way without listening.  It is a developed trait.  Your awareness of it will make it easier to check yourself on it, but it still takes much practice to develop it.
Does the manifestation of a choice also depend on learning to listen?
No - affirmations are your measure of belief and choice - "Awareness" is learning from developing awareness.
Couldn't this conjure up comments like, "Who says, Victor, anything you have to say is worth listening to?"
First listen to yourself - when you have heard all you have to say - you will know who else to listen to and when.
Well, by the satisfaction I get by listening to myself,  you certainly must have a lot more on this subject to tell me.  You wouldn't be holding back now, would you?
I am not holding back from you James - but you may not always get the full impact of an answer at the time. Some things take time to 'sink in.'
I can appreciate that but my SDAQ (Speed of Development Acceptance Quotient) suggest there must be more to make the process easier to apply.
The message is there - occasionally you are not ready for it so you don't allow it to sink in.
Is your learning also predicated on allowing lessons to sink in?
My learning?  Or my teaching?
Your learning.
Mine was a little easier to come by for I didn't have so many pre-conceived notions about the way things "oughter be."
I mean on you present plane.
That was what I meant too -  It's much easier to learn without a mind full of what you have already 'LEARNED.'

                              MATERIALISM   

While we're on the subject of preconceived ideas what's the basis for some teaching the relinquishing of material things?
Is there?
Don't some religious groups infer or prescribe it and steer man away from enjoying material things?  Don't some doctrines steer man away from enjoying material things?
So that someone else can grab all those 'things' you gave up!  Yes - triggered by greed - many leaders denounced 'possession' of material good (publicly! while hoarding privately).
To profess a spiritual life lacking material things has always made me feel uncomfortable.                                        
Material goods are a barometer of your success in making choices.  A tangible in what would otherwise be a spiritual experience (where most mortals could not recognize any change or progress).
Why do they feel that materialistic desires are self defeating?
Perhaps they have chosen that result - not anything inherent in the material acquisition can cause it.
There is also that awareness that occasionally grips me as I fall heir to feeling the importance of things, rather than development.  The contradiction is that I choose to have both.
No wonder at that - rewards make the 'game' worth playing and material goods are a good beginning.  The reason you will have your 'material things' is that you have chosen them - the fair exchange is also a choice - balancing your choices with 'others' choices'.  (That is - allowing others a choice - making them see they have a choice).  Eventually these (things) will not seem important but while they are - let them be plentiful.
Is it possible to attain a materialistic and developmental balance?  I'm not yet aware of the link between "wisdom" and "things" - if there is one.
All is Wisdom/wisdom/learning/development. 'Things' are comforts along the way to your peak of development.  As long as 'things' are not burdensome to you along the way, they are not a detriment...they tend to make the learning easier; i.e. a 'reward' for learning you lessons well.  There is a happy medium, fortunately.  Your development will proceed at the level of your interest in THAT.  If you are truly interested in "self-development" you will attain much higher levels in both areas.  It is possible to enjoy both but really, what is most comfortable?  To enjoy or to deny oneself?  And why deny oneself?  Is that required?
No, but I still have an imbalance of thinking more about profits and luxury than development.  Could this be due to my unawareness to the benefits of development?
The profits and rewards are a physical measure of your success in making choices and your progress in development.  It certainly is not BAD.  It is only a material view of your entire picture.  You haven't become suddenly materialistic.  It is simply that (now) you KNOW you are not limited by your choices - there are reasons for all of these 'things' and not just your 'comfort zone.'  You will see!!
Where is the fine line of distinction where development is upset by quest for material things?
Alas, the line is fine.  You will achieve as you wish - in either area.  The ego-oriented goals are negligible!  The satisfaction of these goals are short lived.  If you are aware of your development in esoteric levels - you will have the satisfaction of your own KNOWING.  Whatever is the most important to you - you will attain.  It may not be ultimately -- the most important but it will prove to you that which is the most important.                    
Why do you say these thing will no longer "seem important" to us?
I was implying that material goods are a tangible measure of accomplishments.  When you no longer question your ability to choose and create, "things" become quite meaningless.
At that point in our development will the need for sensual stimuli derived from material things be terminated?
Not at all - you still derive sensual pleasure but you don't need acquisitions.  Remember sensual stimuli can be a flower, a beautiful sunset, silky skin, a juicy peach, the aroma of home baked bread.  It doesn't have to be your car, your boat, your jewels, your gold.
Well...when you put it that way, I do feel materialistic!  I think I'll slip on my gold watch, hop in my Porsche and drive down to my yacht!
Your choice, dear friend!
It would appear to me Victor, that rather than having  become meaningless, our development would induce greater creativity in us all.
The 'things' are not what is sensual - it is your pleasure derived from them.  And yes, one does become more sensual with practice and you do create more sensual joys and improve your degree of pleasure all the time.
Then why not acquisitions?  Does the odor from home baked bread and a bouquet provide suffice?
James - we may be missing something by definition - in the case of a car - the aggregate parts are not sensual - metal - bolts - cloth and solder.  The finished product may be very sensual - the soft leather seats - the breeze blowing through your sunroof and the smell of leather surrounding you.  Do you see my point?  A boat is a pile of fiberglass and wood and metal - but constructed - it affords you an ever changing view of the most sensual environment and great pleasure in the ambiance of yachting life but it is not the thing itself that is sensual.
What in time replaces the constructed impression we find in things that presently are so important to us?
Your sensual awareness will be so heightened, so developed that you can create the pleasure at will.  At that time, you will be working on the 'sensitive.'
I guess this will have to be experienced before I can fully understand.
You can experience the sensual at any moment you choose - you do now but not nearly enough!
Any suggestions?
Enjoy the now.  You do not take nearly enough pleasure in your present surroundings - your present 'things' and so on.
Isn't this somewhat contradictory - to make affirmations (future) yet stress living in the "now?"
It could be construed as such; however the NOW can be more fun with the expectation of the 'future.'  It is just a little trick you pull on yourself but until you have had some experience with accomplishments - you will still want accomplishments (things).
Would you give me an example of why you don't think I experience nearly enough sensually?  That's a pretty bleak picture.
There is much you are passing over very lightly James.  For instance you ask your students if they think about what they do all day long - but do you?  Do you awaken to pleasant thoughts and sights and sounds?  Do you shower for only cleanliness or do you feel the warmth of the water washing over you skin - easing the muscles and spurring the blood to flow til you tingle in every inch of your body?  Do you drive to work - rushed and tense or do you cruise along enjoying the trees and fields and the hillsides in bloom?  These are just a few thoughts James.  Occasionally it helps to be reminded that there are sensual pleasures everywhere - all around you - always available for your pleasure!

                         CHOICE, BELIEF,
                CREATIVITY, LOGIC & REASON    

Would it be too personal to ask what you wanted out of life?
Peace of mind - tremendous amounts of privacy and all the comforts of an overly indulgent sheik.
Obviously you made it!
Just enough not to go to pot!
What was your lesson for your last incarnation?
Somewhat the same as yours - patience and KNOWING.
Have you ever wondered what choices you would have made living in an environment such as ours?
If I'd wanted it - I would have chosen it too.
I can see that now - a boom box on your pulpit?  Doesn't  one's environment set the periphery of choice. (I missed the point of his last answer).
The need for material goods creates the environment for choices - stimulating creativity.
Choice stimulating creativity?  What happened to belief...I thought the steps to be - choice, belief, creativity...?
The belief is the culmination of creativity - thus it is (or becomes) REALITY.
Hold it.  Let me think about this for a minute.
When you have accomplished the steps of choice and belief - you can move up (graduate) to creativity - logic - and reason.  Reason is a 'conclusion' based on logic and logic is a thought pattern based on creativity and creativity is reality based on choice and belief.  What can I say?  One follows the next and you must begin at the beginning.
(For the reader I have added this graphic description to his last answer).

                         REASON
                 Is a conclusion based on
                          LOGIC

                          LOGIC
            Is a thought pattern based on
                           CREATIVITY

                             CREATIVITY
                           Is reality based on
                  CHOICE AND BELIEF

And I thought choice was tough!
The steps do get easier after you have mastered the basics.
Does one create his reality as a result of belief or do events create reality in spite of belief?
It is all your belief.  You select the endeavors and the results.  There is nothing 'put to you' only whatever you choose.
Is there a prerequisite to making a choice?
The only pre requisite (or rather co-requisite) is BELIEF!
Am I confusing faith and belief?
They are the same in relation to the context in which you use them.  Your belief (or faith) gives power to you endeavors.  Without beliefs, there is no knowing.  The belief is your life force - your energy - your relation to the universe.  Whatever you believe in or have faith in you will achieve and accomplish.
I have always associated faith with my inability to accept religious teachings.  Has this conditioned me to reject belief as well?
The word is incidental now, is it not?  Can you now see how you have limited yourself?  There is no need to continue associating with such 'dead' issues.  Your life is as you choose - now and forever!  Have faith in yourself and the confidence of knowing you can do it!!  The rest will come as a by-product of your truth - your faith - your choice!!
What is the difference between belief and knowing?
They are the same once you use them.  Prior to 'knowing' however, one must believe.
You've suggested we let this information "sink in."  Do you suggest this assuming what you say will ultimately be absorbed by us as truth?
The "sinking in" is believing what you know to be truth.  Not just because I say it or you say it or whatever - knowing and accepting that knowledge for your own uses.  You must believe - then (only) will you choose!  The objectives are 'rewards' for a life well lived and happiness makes the 'dreams' come true.
While we're on belief, illuminate me about that group of natives in the Solomon Islands who worship, feed and swim with sharks without ever having a "believer" attacked.  How can this be accounted for when these ignorant, vicious, and hungry sharks are searching for just such a tidbit?
They have a tremendous belief and can actually communicate with the sharks through the Universal Mind.  Do you recall my remark many months ago?  Think as a child - this is the purest, simplest, logic available and IT WORKS!!
When you choose to simplify and get together with your TRUE feelings - you can.  When you have been complicated in your thoughts - these will even more so be complicated in your life.
We've got to have a few hangups if eliminating oneself as shark bait deduces to "thinking as a child." 
That is basically correct - and isn't life much simpler by only dealing with 10% - and, knowing that is plenty!  It is a paradox but in truth 'simple is all.'  The greatest lessons are the easiest to learn.
And you are a master of deducing the seemingly complex, unsolvable riddles of life, to the ultimate simplicity.
Ah - James - I am a master of the (written) spoken word - "Simplicity is the essence of beauty."
It is interesting to note that when we started this communication some of the most important lessons didn't appear to be a lesson.  Now they appear overwhelming.
Life - dear James - is a LESSON.  We always learn more than we expect!
Why is it so difficult for me to have faith or belief in something I choose ?
Is it?
Sure.  I feel most people would choose more than they experience.   I don't feel lonesome in this respect.  Surely I'm not the first to have communicated with other's of your wisdom but to date little has been written about this awareness and less than what has been published is seemingly lacking in practice.
There are many of the persuasion which I am relating to you.  Naturally some are not even aware of their own progress.  It cannot be done in a day.  There is time for all that must be done.
Now, are we not speaking of evolution?
Somewhat, evolution of souls rather than physical being, however...in respect to Darwinism, theory is correct, information lacking in application.
What is the relationship between wisdom and belief?
One cannot gain the 'grace' of Wisdom without belief.  Before any accomplishment first must come belief.  There are cases where an entity comes to grace (seemingly effortlessly) but believe me! one must believe before any step is taken.
Why is it Victor, of all the things we can attain from the Universal Mind, the only one it gives is freely is wisdom?  Yet, man doesn't/won't generally seek it.
It is an interesting point, James.  In civilizations that were decidedly less developed than your present one, man sought the wisdom of the greater self with zeal - and pursued the meaning of his own existence and his relationship with all of nature.  Now that we have come so far, the importance is misplaced and the greatest question of mankind seems to be, how can I exploit the 'nature' surrounding me?  The greater questions are lost in the hubub of new frontiers.  It is only when one seeks (or is facing death and frightened of the prospect) that man now asks Why? Who? What? Where and When? is the importance of my existence?
But this is contrary to evolving consciousness...which I assumed was the direction it is taking.  Is man's consciousness going backward?
As a whole, the civilization in many fields, is advancing.  The point that I have tried to explain is that these areas of evolvement are mainly in the worldly, materialistic - temporary fields.  There is a new awakening of man to the quest of wisdom but many are seemingly content with just the physical development and tangible acquisitions - until they must face the fact that only knowledge and true wisdom will remain in other planes when we have passed this physical existence.
What is the relationship between "things" and "Wisdom" as both are a byproduct of belief?
To believe, most men must have 'proof' that there is something more to his life than his own physical form: thus, he sets goals (many beyond what he then believes he can accomplish) when these become his accomplishments, he goes on to greater things: As wisdom, insight, love, peace, understanding.  It is only by accomplishing small steps that he feels (believes) he may accomplish even greater steps.      
Back to the chicken and the egg!  A choice is a prerequisite to accomplish but first we need an accomplishment, to instill the confidence, to make the choice.  Have I got it?
This area is rather pleasant in the interim, is it not?  Seeing you choices manifest, reinforces your belief in (yourself) your choices and with practice comes perfection.  When you have 'mastered' belief we can go on to creation.
Let's not traumatize this lesson!
Good - Good - Good!  The determination to learn this well - with no excess work is a great step forward.  Some never 'get' this one!
I've got a great list of choices.  Let's discuss attaining more belief to accomplishment them... quickly?  I suppose this will lead into my need for patience very shortly.
The belief comes with realizing your success in the area of choices - as we have mentioned before.  Perhaps you should make a list (like your affirmation board) of your accomplishments in the past year and then your choices won't seem so overwhelming.  Concentrate on your successes - the choices that HAVE manifested.  Eventually you will recondition your thinking so that you'll never again allow negative thoughts into your KNOWING.  Meanwhile just keep catching those negative thoughts as soon as you can and literally toss them out of your mind!  I think the accomplishment board will be very effective in reinforcing your belief (and your confidence).  It does not matter that you question - only that (in the end) you DO BELIEVE!  Look it over occasionally.  Look back through your thought books - that will give you a lot to enrich your faith!  Perhaps you should make your 'chart' again - it is much easier to perceive in 'physical' terms than abstractly.  Posters or cards are most effective.  It registers in your mind all at the same instant and is more impressed than by word. The idea of the posters - pictures and personal visits to (any material affirmation) is to keep the excitement fresh in your mind - the more excitement - the better the stimulus to your sub.  The quiet tranquillity of knowing is fine but the fanfare and the stars and sparkles are what makes it rewarding to the senses!  The emotion gives it SPARK - electricity (if you will).  Just make it more 'forward' in your mind.  
Emotions can be a catalyst or a smoke screen - You just have to KNOW your true thoughts.  Sometimes it takes 'hindsight' to see your own "true thoughts."  Go over the list again with a fine-toothed comb and see if there are any 'snarls' or any that have been changed or to be added or deleted.  By being more specific, the more quickly an affirmation can be 'assimilated' into your consciousness.  It speeds up the completion or fruition of any goal to be VERY SPECIFIC.
There are many lessons involved in these choices - not only the choice itself - the belief - the real thought of the fruition.  It is not we who are making it difficult - but you who want, need and expect to learn HARD LESSONS.  The choices are coming as quickly as you believe - expect and choose them to happen.  You can drag it out.  We are guiding you but it is ultimately your choice.  Your choice is an abundance am I correct?  Have you yet had a deficiency?  There has always been the required amount with some left over - THAT IS AN ABUNDANCE.  It could be more but it is an abundance.
You're about to make a point, aren't you.  OK, so I'm transposing enough, for abundance.  What's your point?
James - I am not trying to rationalize your situation - but you have chosen for some time to 'get by' - you are beginning to think "big" but you still limit yourselves somewhat.  James the word ABUNDANCE is the right choice but your use of it is still limited by your interpretation of the word and your limits of yourselves.  You do limit the abundance as you limit your manifestation of affirmations by not expecting all and NOW!!!
How do we put into perspective that one minute you say we are doing fine and the next minute that we limit ourselves?
You can 'get by' with just fine but why not have FABULOUS results with only a slight change of attitude?  A little more effort can change the picture from "OK" to "WONDERFUL."  Why not a big smile - a burst of energy to do something fun?  A picnic?  A sailboat ride?  Why the pessimism?  Why not EXPECT that you're going to hear GOOD NEWS?  WONDERFUL NEWS?
What do you mean I don't expect?  My meditation visualizations are petty good!
'Pretty good' is okey if you want 'pretty good' results.   Not disparaging James but you do yet LIMIT your self!  Use terms like
                        EXCELLENT

                         FABULOUS

                        FANTASTIC

                          SUPERB

If you check your thesaurus you may come up with a few more appropriate than I use.  This can apply to money - love - joy and so on.  There will continue to be enough or if you choose - otherwise - an ABUNDANCE.  No - "money does not grow on trees" - at least not in MY reality - but it is easy to come by if you do not give it the 'power' of elusiveness and "rarity!"  It is common - not at all RARE!  Your choices are all coming to fruition - exactly as you choose so - - - needless to say - - - BE SURE OF WHAT YOU CHOOSE FOR YOU SURELY WILL GET IT!
Would it help us to list, if we can become aware of or admit to our preconceived notions or limitations? 
It always helps to clearly define any situation.  If you wish to list them - all the better - then toss them out the window!
Would you suggest us to focus on any particular choice at the outset?
All of them - save only the knowledge that you can choose anything in your own plane or any other and when and if, you so choose, nothing will be beyond your grasp.  That is all.  The order of the acquisitions is not as important as he idea of all the end results.  They will be - it is now a matter of time and patience!  The advise is to remove all the pre-conceived ideas and allow yourself the space to fantasize - let your imagination run free, for this is not an area governed by "logic" and you will not accomplish it by "logical means."  
You must first believe that you are the most important in your creation for you are the creator.  You are the most important being in your reality.  The others will come and go - some stay longer than others - or may seem more significant in one area - or another but it is truly only you that matters for you.  After that - it's all "fair winds and following seas."
How does such a "compassionate" attitude add or detract from our human relations?
Well - it adds to respect and detracts from manipulation.
You don't reflect on this as somewhat "egocentric?"
Ego is trying to justify a position in the world - worth is knowing your self...if you expect and feel worthy you will always succeed in acquiring you standards.
Why has Universal Mind necessitated choice and belief?  Aren't these two primary steps inherent in heightened awareness?  They appear to be more an interim pacification than an ultimate necessity.
The 'pacification' as you say - is to give you confidence in your choices - eventually you simply KNOW and you do not need to go through the steps.  You have a 'little time' to practice yet, James.
I'm slowly absorbing the idea of belief, but I know I'm still trying to PROVE, how, to account for the results rather than just "believing."
Profound, James.  As you allow this to "sink into your whole mind" you will revel in knowing what scientists cannot prove and scoffers label as "magic."  There is a great comfort in Knowing!  Believe, Yes!
The negativism's that exist today seem so overwhelming it seems pointless to discuss positiveness/success thinking with the general public.  The movie we saw last night, "Oh God," was a good example.
I was wondering when you would mention the movie.  Quite nicely done, wasn't it?   Subtle but very direct!  Yes, there is much negativism about you, but as the script goes, "It's your ball now!"  Just for starters, let's try never to listen to negative thoughts, our own or others.  This will be a tremendous step!  The other point you might practice; when it comes to mind, don't expect proof of everything that you are learning.  What is - is!  Just believe and all good shall come to you.  This comes with practice James, and only then can you perceive as though it is your 'second nature.'  You have had a lifetime of the 'failure syndrome' - now allow a few days to feel comfortable with "success thinking."  Remember James, you are not ruled by events - but your perception of what you view.  When all is said and done - it is only what you see that determines your attitude.  Your perception determines what you 'see' - and yes you create your perception so it is easily changed from a 'negative' to a 'positive' via your perception.  Perspectives change - of course but the experiences themselves are consistent.  The 'meaning' will be your interpretation of your perspective of the experience.  See?
What do you mean when you say "but the experiences themselves are consistent?"
The physical effects may be the same to all who experience it - but each one's perception will determine his 'reality.'
Does a true choice change an experience or just one's perspective of the experience?
The physical effects remain the same - one's perspective changes his 'reality.'  To simplify even further - let us say we have a bucket of water.  To a drowning man it is horrific - to a man dying of thirst it is splendid!  The bucket of water has not changed.
Apply that viewpoint to our choice of a boat.
Okay - to your son a recreational vehicle is "where it's at!"  He looks at a boat as 'not much' - to you - that boat is adventure - freedom - tranquillity - sanity and pure sensual pleasure!  You can change your perspective of an experience (for example - future - past - present) but the 'experience' (the physical characteristics) remain the same.  To simplify again - your boat - it is a 44 foot vessel with amidships cockpit and an aft cabin.  Your interpretation - shall we say your perspective of it goes from - "Hummm - pretty big boat - to hey that's just what we were looking for, to, "I'm very pleased with our choice now we have it - would you care for another larger yacht my dear?"  The object is - that is all - the enjoyment - the use or whatever distant thought you are getting to is a perception - of yours - mine is different - so is everyone else's!
(I would like to point out that three years later we bought a 43 foot, Challenger, center cockpit, aft cabin sailboat.  At the time I thought Victor was using this as a description of a boat for his explanation.  It was not exactly what we were looking for and subsequently sold it within three years and bought a 38 foot, twin diesel, motor yacht.  We later moved to Florida, sold the motor yacht bought a 30' Mainship, single engine diesel, sold that, bought a 28' Stamus Liberty with bracketed twin 200 Suzuki's, sold that and found our love in tennis. Today we have no boat and I do not feel a loss or regret that I don't have a boat for I have replaced my original choice, boating, with tennis.  What's my next choice, I often think).
Can a person know he worries and simultaneously choose not to worry?
That is a very thin line James - one also can be aware (perceive) murder, illness, devastation and not be a part of it.  Do you see the distinction?  Those things are very real - to those involved - but you needn't choose to experience them to know they are REAL.  Perceive all that is and then choose what you allow into your KNOWING.
What's the effect of such perceptions?
You can recognize anything and not especially choose it to be part of your KNOWING - or you can perceive and choose NOT to experience it.  It is (again) you choice - hah hah - back to BASICS, eh, James?
Is perceiving one's own TRUE thoughts and conscious perception the same thing?
I can be but usually is NOT!
What's the difference?
Perceiving your own TRUE thoughts is REALITY - conscious perception may be very distorted by what you have always been taught.  Discern your TRUE thoughts rather than LEARNED thoughts (and responses).                           
Judging from the speed by which I'm manifesting choices I am in doubt if I truly perceive or even know how to perceive a true thought.  How can I know I am?
If you question that you have been perceiving - you have NOT - to begin  - you must make an affirmation - truly want - need - and expect the manifestation of the end result and commit it to your subconsciousness.  Do not try to imagine why it CAN'T be - only know that it WILL be.  That is perceiving.
Let me give you an example of how I visualize my ability to perceive.  You tell me to close my eyes and visualize/perceive a banana.  I clearly visualize a banana.  You tell me I didn't VISUALIZE a banana.
You perceived an image of a banana and of course you told yourself it was an image not a banana.
You realize, I'm sure, the mortal's problem of transforming an image of a banana into a banana!
That is REALITY - dear friend.
(Think of the number of times in your life you have heard comments from performers, who you perceive as hitting the big time on a "lucky break" say, "At age eight I knew I was going to be an actor," and continued to study acting for the next twenty years.  Or, how many children have you heard say, "I'm going to be a doctor when I grow up?"  This is the perception Victor was attempting to teach me...choosing and pursuing almost as though, by nature, it had already happened to them.  This lesson was not about transforming images of bananas into real bananas.  It was about transforming what you don't want to do into what you choose to do - by choice rather than being routed by preconceived ideas).
 I can see we'll be in this lesson until a "snap" is heard!  
You will hear it!  Or a 'squish -splat' of a banana squirted out of its peel onto the table - BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES - then you will perceive.
AND FROM WHENCE COMES THE FRUIT OF THE APE?  (I was still approaching the subject from how, when and where).
Whence would'st thou choose?
So, perceiving is materializing?
Perceiving is creating - yes - material objects if you choose.  If you choose to own a physical object and use it - you need only choose.  Perceiving is REALIZING or making REAL by perceiving.  When the true thought is recognized - it is!!  Need we pursue this to oblivion?
How do you maintain such an objective attitude with me having such a negative attitude?
Dearest James!  I care enough to give you your choice - in all matters - certainly I could speed up a few areas but this then would not be your choice and that is all important to us all.  Choice is the greatest respect one can give another.
I try to conceive questions that would be advantageous to our development but am constantly aware of my limitations.  My questions are limited by physical experience.
That will come, dearest!  Size, density and composure - composition - have little to do with other planes.  It is all in our deeper mind but you must begin to let it out!
I can't imagine what I cannot see!  How can it be if it is not seen?  This is obviously a mortals perception: "What isn't seen, surely can't be!"
James, it is so simple if only you will let it be - it is all there - if you care to see it!  What you believe, you can perceive.  You don't see what you don't want to see!  You see what you want to see. That simple! 
 I understand but find it difficult to apply toward all circumstances with consistency.  For instance, today I felt great.  But tomorrow, should I become emotional regarding a problem...?
It is amazing how easy it can be (for you) when you allow it to be.  You have a bright future ahead - selling your homes - (P and I were real estate brokers in San Diego) choosing your goals - writing your books - it is all in the interpretation of what you see!  It can be tedious if you look at it from the viewpoint of 'selling' one home after another - conquering one 'dragon' after another - or on to more and better challenges.
Is it possible in your plane to loose perspective of the manner in which mortals think?
I suppose it could be for some who are not always in close contact with your plane - but not me!
I hope you don't loose patience or take offense to my endless questions but I feel unless I ask them I may not uncover a deeper, more important question.
I am not offended - only "questioning" your noble efforts to answer every unanswered question -  I am sure we have neither the time nor the inclination to cover EVERYTHING James - let's just hit the high points and then questions will be encouraged - for is that not the best way to learn?
I suppose I am too scrutinizing.  Ok then, only the high points. (I felt a little hypocritical, almost knowing my questions would immediately slip from the "high points" to the inane).
Okay - Okay!  The point I am trying to make clear to you is that there may be some "doubters" who read your book and disparage every word - but most who will read - are also seeking and will have some questions regardless of how thorough you may try to be.  In the interest of publishing the first - let us get ON with it - so it will not be published "posthumously" (for all of us).
Why is it I have more question than I can ask and others you've been introduced to don't seem to have a first question?  I'd hate to think this book wouldn't serve anybody's needs.
They probably do but are in such a fog they haven't isolated any more questions - that is the purpose of the program  - to teach people to find their TRUE THOUGHTS!  To shed the excess baggage and get down to bare bones!  To see what they are REALLY thinking for ONCE in their lives!  Shall we go on to our quest of reality?  logic -? reason?
Why not?  Logic, here we come.  A definite must from my vantage point.
And what then - shall we say - is reality?  The thought - the action - or the result?  What do you see? feel? KNOW?  
Start from here----
P and I agree reality would be the thought.  Pauline sees endless possibilities and I envision a mortal plane of existence in various stages of awareness and endless possibilities.  I sense a limitless reality whose perimeter is determined only by perception and KNOW there is a homogeneous law of equanimity of all that is.
That is a surprising appraisal - actually I thought you would be very superficial but - all in all - a very thoughtful answer.  You are doing much more with your development than I anticipated.
Thanks for your approval of my appraisal.  I can't take much credit for it as it is only a reiteration of what you've taught us.  However, I have another definition of reality as relating to substance or form.  It might be said (but not by me, of course) that a camera would provide evidence of reality for what was not real/in existence/substance could not reflect light to the film.  I KNOW you have something to say about this latter definition, don't you Victor?
A good point James, then if it "shows" on a piece of paper in a pattern of light it is REAL?  And does that include LOVE?  Does that include FEAR?  How about "pictures" that don't 'come out' - are those subjects then not REAL?
I knew it.  What if I said I don't have an inherent curiosity to question or discuss reality any more with you?  How come?
Because your conception of reality is only as you have been "taught" - without the influence of others conceptions, you would "KNOW."
Ok.  If it's agreed that reality is our individual perception, what more is there to discuss regarding reality?  Whew!
Okay - we'll drop that (if it is really that simple to you).
It's not that simple, it's just that I don't have any questions created by knowing the limits of reality is conscious perception.
Then we should use our consciousness for reality?  Simple enough - Choose to use our consciousness for reality...aren't we now back to choice and belief?
Not exactly - - - this reality bounded by consciousness is "KNOWING."
Well, don't we know belief and choice?
I should hope so - BY NOW!
I think I was just struck by the reality that this conversation just went in a circle!
Perhaps, but is the point understood?  "KNOWING" as opposed to "learning choice and belief?"
Didn't we also learn that reality is conscious perception?
You may - some do - - -
What the difference of learning and knowing reality?
KNOWING - is reality.  Learning is fine - if one ever gets around to it.
Back to the chicken and egg...does consciousness create reality or does reality create one's consciousness?
Consciousness is the beginning - it alone can create!
Then when dealing with others, we should be thoughtfully aware that their perception has created their opinion.
The "KNOWING" comes with time and experience in perceiving your own TRUE thoughts.  Yes - one should take "opinion" into consideration in this area.  Each has his own perception James and that is truth but when those perceptions are in conflict - no one 'wins' - you both lose by trying to 'justify.'  It then becomes a defense.  Are you defending?  Is miss P?  And what?  Your pride?  Your freedoms to choose?  To perceive?
Any suggestions on how to handle the affect of opinions that may differ in a relationship?
First they should each define (to themselves) what that reality is.  Then - if they can 'compare notes' and see a common thread running through, they should try to strengthen that bond.  If there is no common bond - they should release one another from the 'captivity.'  It's easy to get very comfortable with a situation and just let it ride - on the other hand - love nurtures with time and there is a growing comfort in deeply knowing another who is so compatible with your ideas and thoughts and life-styles.
Is friendship, love, companionship, etc., based on the premise of similar or compatible realities?
Yes and no - you may be very compatible on one area and completely opposed in another.  I would say love transcends all else and friendship runs a close second.
Is there love on other planes?                              
Yes - in many other planes and it is as inexplicable here - as there.
Couldn't the lack of trying to understand another's reality destroy love?
It can destroy some of the 'comfort' and 'ease' of the relationship - but love - like consciousness is not destroyed - only altered.
I could have benefited from these ideas had I understood them sooner.  Better late than never!
Yes - I'm sure you would have saved a lot of misery.  Perhaps this can save others some!
However, with state laws as they are these ideas require real objectivity.                                           
Yes but it is much easier than tearing oneself to shreds with subjectivity.
Marriage seems to be a relationship snuggled somewhere between objectivity and subjectivity.
Marriage is a contract to compliment each other in some or (usually) many ways.  It is quite useful (for man) but by no stretch of the imagination is it perfection.
Then the laws governing adultery must lack perfection.
Of course!  The rule AND THE BREAKING OF IT!
One effect of adultery is the damaged ego of the faithful and that he/she couldn't possibly be loved.
Then the spouse (the victim) is not showing true love by not allowing the other his COMPLETE freedom.  The act itself is not the infraction, but casting doubt on the others' irresistibility.
What is your attitude of such a physical relief?
Too much energy (in my opinion) for too little reward.  After all - it is not that you are trying to propagate and build up the population is it?  I personally have much preferred a "steady" relationship with one whom I am accustomed to the scent, the touch and the responses.  Conquering new worlds has always seemed more to conquer me!
Sounds like choice also reins with sex...that it's up to the individual.
Yes - you have it!  That is the basic lesson.  In many societies that too, is the rule!
You discuss doubt on another's irresistibility.  This sounds like jealousy!  What can be said here to expose jealousy?
That is determined by the ego - if one is irresistible, there would be no use for jealousy.  If one would like to be irresistible and questions his ability to be such the jealousy is a precaution to safe-guard one's 'possessions' - i.e. another's attention, affection, idolatry, etc.
How far can the reality of one person go without interference with another's reality?
One's reality is only his - the reality of mass consciousness is complimentary to all other's (individual) reality.  This is difficult to comprehend without the KNOWING of REALITY - (which will be more understandable in your deeper meditative states or astral projection).
You say knowing is a product of time, experience in perceiving one's true thoughts.  How many mortals achieve this without being taught?
Anyone can but most persons are taught reality by what their parents perceive - later teachers and so on until they do not even realize that they have an original thought.  If babies are nurtured with love and creativity - nothing would be impossible for them to perceive (thus CREATE).  Creativity is reality.  One can only perceive 'that he knows is reality, which in fact, the child created.  Only from the first days, they are taught that `Mother knows BEST' or 'Father knows BEST' and they are 'restricted' - in clothing - in cribs - in 'pens' and they can only perceive a world with limits.  It is sad to take this away from them so young - before they KNOW there is a choice.
What can be said about a reality that a child or I don't create?  Example: humor.
You create it if it is in your perception - therefore you are as humorous as you perceive.
How do you explain the humor in a joke?
The joke is generally just a distortion of reality - thus causing laughter (sometimes a nervous reaction to the thought of what may be).  The 'humor' is seeing the reaction (or imagining it), if the 'joke' were TRUE REALITY.
To this point we have learned conscious perception is reality but what is the rest of all that exist, that we don't perceive?  In other words, is something that exist,  that we don't perceive, reality?
Creativity is reality bounded by conscious perception.  "Reality not perceived" would not then be reality only possibilities or choices.
My reality (perception) is that I'm pushing this cart and you're not about to get me to the front! 
You can't learn from a 'lead' position - you have to create all the positions! 
What can be said regarding a curiosity I can't perceive?  Is it not a reality because I can't yet define it?
You may not realize that you perceive curiosity but your perception is much deeper than you perceive.  Once perceived - they become reality - until then, only possibilities.
Where do possibilities originate?
Possibilities are presented or taught by others - therefore they are not KNOWING.
So, all perceptions are knowing - everything else is a possibility?
KNOWING is reality (as you perceive it).  Possibilities or choices may be used or not to CREATE reality (as you perceive it).
Let's define this further.  Please give us your meaning of perceive.
'KNOW' in your senses.
Let's go back to opinions.  Others opinions are then only possibilities as I do not perceive similar realities?
Yes - you do not perceive it therefore it is not REAL - to you.
How can one acquire different perceptions of an object or thought?  (I almost have to apologize for this question.  After all, that's all this book concerns).
Two can perceive a similar situation differently - that of course is CHOICE.
How does one make religion, patience or humor his reality?
Choose - affirm - and perceive!
That's it?  Still sounds too simple.
Sorry! but that's the way it is!  Soon you won't have to 'MAKE' affirmations - the perception will do the trick but until you realize your own TRUE thoughts - it is better to have the written form and look it over - think about it and 'test' it for a little while so that you get exactly as you 'really' CHOOSE.
Are we capable of creating a different reality in life to any greater degree than we could music?  For instance, should we choose to compose, it would probably be classified as rock, classical, jazz etc. and, therefore, not considered creating.
Not especially - after all 'MUSIC' began with many discordant sounds - the drums and rattles first - then perhaps horns and whistles - then - when it seemed the 'art form' could go no further - came along the strings and reeds - this was topped by electronic interpretations as 'MOOG' - can this be surpassed?  Only a creator can go beyond the known - and they do it every day of the week!  Amazing.  Each has his own interpretation of how it 'should' be done.   Your interpretation is your reality!
So what's the point in studying music if composition is all that is taught?  Doesn't this also preclude the justification of following God, Jesus, the Bible or U.C. as teachers?
The only difference may be if they are teaching the student to become creative and self-reliant or to simply copy his style and go out in the world to propagate (his reality) as the one and only way!
My sister says she has no blueprint of reality and must operate on faith.  (At times different people will be in attendance of our questioning period and will ask question pertinent to the subject matter).
Oh really?  The faith is her conviction of the KNOWING she is experiencing through her self-reliance and creativity.
She says the Bible instructs us to operate on faith and wants to know if you suggest operating on faith?
Faith in oneself!  Not blind faith in other's reality!!
How can one be sure about his chosen reality?
You must search within for your TRUE THOUGHTS - there is reality only in your own TRUE THOUGHTS!
If it's a child's true thought - thus his reality - that the Easter bunny put the eggs in the basket, why then, doesn't the rabbit put the eggs in the Easter basket?
He is relating to what his conditioning has told him.  Without the input from parents etc. - he would by observation know that bunnies do not lay eggs - and the brightly colored ones could only come from a very rare chicken - thus 'parents' have to help the Easter "entity" deliver the goodies.
How can I as an adult be sure my reality isn't colored eggs in an Easter basket?
You will have to do a lot of 'Spring Cleaning' (of your thoughts - ideas - social and intrinsic values).  You will KNOW!!
You are already experiencing the KNOWING.  It is now a matter of realizing that only you can interpret your own reality.  Your reality is KNOWING you own true thoughts!
Is this thought process difficult for mortals only because of our brainwashing?
I would say 'CONDITIONED' but same idea - it is a challenge to let go of all the props, veils, armor and facades.  To stand NAKED before your REALITY?
How can one stand naked before his perception/reality?
James, part of your 'dressing' is denying yourself - enjoying your apprehension - reveling in your 'slow struggle' to KNOW.  The "plodding" disturbs you because you have known the 'ease' with which lessons may be accomplished when 'all is smooth.'  You also know your cliff-hangers - all too well and choose not to encounter more of them.  The emotions of the day or the last few days, weeks, should be carefully examined and look at your thoughts OBJECTIVELY - the pattern - as your 'life book' will tell you - is there to discern!!  You can let that all go now!
Am I using a problem to repel change?
James, I would not presume your 'problems' are that precious to you - but since we are not administering 'placebos' - it is YOUR choice and, of course, if you can admit any 'dressing' you can rid yourself of it.
What advice can you administer to rid us of our dressings?
Realize it is there and then let it go - you no longer NEED it - okay?  My point is that there are no limitations to interpretations - it can be as great or as small as YOU decide.  It is relative to the mind of the observer - as is the theory of relativity - do you see now?  They are both in the interpretation of the beholder!  That is the greatest lesson you will ever learn - YOU Choose and IT IS!!  The lesson is a BIG one so allow it to 'sink in' for awhile -
How much of our sensory reality should we accept as our truth?                                                   
Of course your reality is as you perceive it and it may seem very odd to others - even fantasy compared to their dour outlook.  The purpose of sensory (sensual) stimulation is to recognize and experience all of these responses and to KNOW they are only sensual - then you may begin to recognize sensitive awareness and your will learn from there to recognize a TRUE THOUGHT - It is to an ultimate end result of awareness and creativity!  The most interesting will be when you traverse planes - substance is and is not - time changes - ideas are concrete or spun sugar - whatever you choose!  James, you WILL adore it.
While in our present time frame, however, will we be concerned only with lessons that transcend choice, belief, reality, logic and reason?
If you get through all of the above - you won't care what 'time frame' you're in - you will transcend time!
How does choice correlate with evaluation, comparison, creativity etc?
The purpose of choice is to induce creativity - reason - evaluation (which is reason also).  They all correlate in that they are the 'beginning' of the road to reason?  
Did you purposefully exclude belief and reality?
The choice 'covers' those steps - the end result is creativity and thence REASON!
I think I may have enough information on REALITY to practice on for a while. How about a 'chat' regarding creativity?
Why not?  TO CREATE - is to choose - believe and perceive and conceive!!!  Ha Ha Ha!  Know that you create your own reality.  Simple eh?
That's creativity?
That's where you can start - you'll become more creative as you practice it.  It is there for you to use - just let it flow!
It is starting to all run together.  I understand choice and that it instills a belief system and as a result one produces a reality which is a result of doing that which is necessary to manifest this reality.
Correct.
You haven't more to say other than that, eh?
That says it all.
You also stated that creativity is knowing.  I am unable to relate creativity to knowing.
You couldn't create unless you know.  To do you also know.
How is it possible then for some people to do (I assume create) so much but create so little?
How do you know they are doing?  It may just appear that way to you.
Perhaps we should have a common understanding of doing.
Now come on James, you know what doing is.  It's not sitting on your...
I'd say a good example of this is our friend, Bill.  He's always doing something but...
He may be doing a lot more than you think.  Or, may not be doing as much as it appears.
What can you say regarding the confidence that one must place in what he does to manifest his reality?
I really can't say much, it's all up to you.
Once a choice is made, is what to do to manifest it, instinctive?
If he's made the choice and believes in it he will do what's necessary whether or not it's a true choice.
Isn't all this "doing" refuting the idea of not having to be concerned with the "HOWS?"
Only if you choose to be concerned.
Why has it been suggested not to be concerned with the "HOWS" as manifestations will rarely occur as expected?
Don't confuse yourself.  By that remark it was not meant exactly that way.  What was meant was to not worry about the how because if you're too concerned about the how, your end result will rarely occur as expected.  Just do and the results will probably be what you expect.
What's the difference between "do" and "how?"
How is questionable.  Do is just that.
Can you see where we might feel a little insecure as to the outcome of our doing?
Oh yes - I suppose one might feel a little unsure when you have has so little experience in this creativity - although you have certainly had enough success to feel more sure!
Touche.
As awareness becomes more developed don't we know our true thoughts and subsequently eliminate the steps preceding creativity; those of choice and belief?
That is the end result.  Not a choice but simply creating the result you want.  (Although) you must first understand thoroughly choice and belief to KNOW creativity).
I understand.  You didn't think I was inferring you skip me a grade?
Of course not James, Hah, Hah.  I know your patience is now limitless!!
When a person commences from creativity (rather than incorporating the steps of choice and belief) isn't a more direct path set, thus minimizing the possibilities of choice?
To some extent - it does eliminate "excess baggage" in the 'choice' areas but each man's truth is based on his own creativity so there is still variety but not so many 'paths' as to confuse the creativity of one with another.
Shall we try a taste of logic?
I would say logic is a rationale based on an individuals thought process.
That could be an interpretation - the 'reason' of human thought, then?
I have concluded thought is to determine a choice.
Then 'logic' must be to choose?
I'm not clear, on that basis, if logic is the approach to attain the foundation from which to derive a true choice and belief.  (There were times when I would write a statement without fully understanding what it was I wanted to state or question.  This was one of those times.  In many instances such indefiniteness produced interesting results).
"That basis?"  What basis??  What foundation??  Are you grounded in your thinking??  Does it have to remain stationary??  What then is creativity??  Where do we go now??
Would you buy that as a Freudian slip?
Me neither.
Okay!  We are NOW agreed on (at least) one thing - - -
I agree, it (logic) doesn't have to remain stationary.  On that basis my logic says that at 100 mph I would go 200 miles in one hour.
Your 'logic' is never gonna make it at "Indy."
My logic didn't remain stationary.
But that does not make it 'Right.'  When you say 100 Miles per hour - one would presume you mean 100 miles traveled in one hour - or 200 miles per hour = 200 miles traveled in one 'elapsed' hour.  Do you see?
I see that as a foundation for determining distance traveled at a known speed.
No - it is the interpretation of 'distance' (Interpretation) 'traveled' (opinion of illusion) in an 'elapsed' "time" (illusion).  Now what is time - speed - distance???
Well, if that's the case is it not also logical to travel 100 miles (interpretation) in an hour going 50 miles per hour (interpretation)?
An interpretation - yes - but if 'that' is what you are basing 'your' logic on, it becomes rather difficult to pass on to others, does it not?  Or does it matter - anyway?
Help!! I'VE JUST BEEN SNOWED UNDER!!  AND IT'S GETTING DEEPER!!
This is what we (in the '`biz') call "AVALANCHE!
Send the St. Bernard's!!
With or without Brandy?  (Or do you prefer Cognac)?
Let's say I'm on a 300 foot building and my logic tells me I can reach the ground with a 250 foot rope.  Do I fall 50 feet or am I on the ground when I run out of rope?
Where do you want to be?  On the ground floor? or at the end of your rope?
Incidentally, are either of us making any sense?
That is one's interpretation of our logic!  Ha Ha!  Am I making any sense to you?  Actually this bantering is clearing up some 'snags' that might not otherwise 'uncover' til much later (when we probably would have lost our train of thought - not to say - we may have done that already).
Not me - I chose not to be hanging 50 feet in the air and am on the ground.
So you take your rope to the 'top' and slide down and you will reach the ground floor -  Just ask Doug Henning!
I'm still hanging 50 feet above ground, huh?
CREATE a 50' stepladder and climb down (or up) to REALITY!
Or find a lake to drop in.
Now that's an interesting concept - a high-rise over a lake - in a lake - above a lake?
It's not that I'm opposed to it but creating a 50' step ladder while swinging 50' over a lake by the end of a rope gets into the "BIG TIME."  Just ask Doug!
How about a big umbrella - a parachute - a large pillow in which to land -marshmallow fluff?  Come now - let's get CREATIVE???
Do you mean creative about how to go the remaining 50'?
You seem to have that on your mind.
I'd just as soon make logic out of this than to keep swinging.
Then it is resolved - when one has a dilemma, he must then create a solution.  The 'logic' which you will learn is based on creativity and will be much improved from the 'logic' you now 'know.'
My definition of logic could make it contradictory to choice and belief.
Logic is the end result of choice and belief - if you understand 'TRUE' logic (which is quite different from most 'logic' that you encounter in your day to day life).  With your former idea of LOGIC - it would seem that creativity - affirmations - etc. would have absolutely no place in the conversation but when you realize that LOGIC is actually thoughts based on creativity patterns, ideas, motives...  You will notice a change in your whole way of thinking.
This "improved" logic suggest our manifestations are prefaced by choice?
Yes of course!  The logic' though goes much further than material acquisitions.
I'm sure it does but how are we to learn to apply a whole new approach to our logic?
The questioning seems to be the easiest method in which to acquire the "basic" lessons.  Once you feel comfortable with this and some other basics - we can really get to the "brass tacks" of creativity and thus "LOGIC."
I sense you're trying to make us feel comfortable regarding our mortal concerns by taking a rather frivolous attitude about it.  Am I correct in assuming this is your way of teaching us your logic?
I am not making light of your concerns - only trying to help you see in the proper perspective.  The logic comes long after having shed those earthly concerns.
Are you saying we will not enjoy this logic until we shed our interest of material things?
No - not shed the acquisitions - shed the importance you place on acquiring them; that is: expect them - don't deprive yourself because you feel they will take a long time and much effort to acquire - it "should" be and "will" be soon - only the time to make a choice - then it will be done!
Let's go back to the steps: 1) Choice and Belief 2) Reality 3) CREATIVITY 4) LOGIC (which is still a bit VAGUE in your terms 5) REASON.  We're up to number 4.  Shall we work that over a bit?
Logic - to expect or assume?  How's that?
Close - but simpler and more direct!
Logic - being?
Close - close - keep on - please.
Logic - actuality?
Getting closer!  How about? INEVITABLE -
That tends to suggest future events and the involvement of time.
There is NO FUTURE - nor past!
For you maybe...another subject to hold for a rainy day... Have you a synonym that we may find more comfortable.
A surety? it is difficult to simplify more than "fait accompli."
(We looked fait accompli up in the dictionary and answered his question).
That fits perfectly.  It doesn't reference time and is already accomplished and presumably irreversible.  #4 = fait accompli.
SUPERB!
Superb, almost, for you maybe but I can't yet account for that total grasp of logic.  Doesn't logic nullify the necessity of creativity?  If I accept your logic as something already accomplished, why do I need the step of creativity?                                                 
The steps are all interrelated.  Perhaps as a "separate but equal" explanation - they are not complete without each other but can be used separately - - -  you cannot have one without the others and though you must learn the steps in sequence - they can (and will) be used up - down - sidewise and inside out.  Just KNOW the steps and when you use them, they are as time will become for you - NOW!  If one is aware enough to use logic and reason - by all means - he should.  Otherwise he should use simplicity and search for the truth that will come from within.
Is logic and reason used to determine choice?  They seem subsequent to having made a choice.
It is subsequent to 'making' the choice.  Effecting the choice is the combination of all the steps - choice - belief - reality - creativity - logic and reason!  You choose the things that are precious and 'logical' to you - you create your own logic!
Fait accompli is a tough lesson to accept.  To believe/know  that something has already happened when our programming...well, you get what I mean.
Somewhat - but - does it have to be?  Why??
How can my past choices have been made without logic?
Many have been made without logic - it is a moot question now because you (are beginning) to use thought and logic AND REASON in your choices and creativity.
You mean I made enough choices without logic that I should know better now by experience?
Yes.  You don't believe in doing anything half way - to expound upon it - you must experience it yourself.
Can I assume I excluded choice as well?
Yes - one would assume you did not (for an extended period) exercise you OWN choice.
How would you define my decision to go to college, choose accounting, get my first job, return to California, etc., etc?
I would say in most of those instances you were "SET UP."
Is that the same as "suckered?"
Well - I would not wish to stir up your "dander" after the fact!
Everything by the unaware method, Huh?
I would say it was more a situation of being manipulated by others whims...and you were not UNAWARE of being 'used' - were you?  At least in general terms?
Manipulations of that nature are standard operating procedures for one's best interest.
That is what you were meant to believe - everyone 'lives' like this - it's the only 'Christian' way of life.
So that I don't repeat some of these unaware steps let's have at logic again.  Why is it necessary to perceive reality as accomplished when one's reality already exist?  (Another thoughtless question.  This question suggest that I forgot my choice: how to enjoy, rather than remain in the status quo).
Because one's reality has already been accounted for does not mean it was realized with logic.
It just seems redundant - yet!
You can change your reality at anytime so it is not redundant.
I realize this but I still don't fully understand the necessity of the step.
Only if you want to use it.
Why would I want to us logic, is my dilemma.  My reality accounts for this step.  
Your choice.  Logic is determined in different stages for different people.  You need only realize that a logical procedure involves a way of accomplishment in a comfortable manner.  Logically speaking is an understood statement.  One that all could consider easily accomplished and real.  Therefore, logic could be considered something already done - but only to the individual.  For some things would be logical to some and not to others.
Logic, therefore, is one's perception of something accomplished by virtue of his ability to do/create?
Yes, that would be a more accurate definition of logic.
Where does one's subconscious come into play?
The subconscious gives people insight and ideas into their existing awareness.  Logic is actually only relative to the individual.  When two or more individuals experience similar ideas from previous experiences and beliefs - a so called common logic can be believed to exist between those individuals.  The subconscious interjects thought flows or feelings that influence one's opinion of what is or isn't logical.  It may be a gut feeling that takes the place of reasoning when reasoning can't be had.
Why is it designed that the subconscious is conditioned by the conscious?
The subconscious is more realistic than the conscious but not always as reasonable.
What do you mean by reasonable?
Having the power to reason -
Isn't the sub's conditioning the result of one's conscious belief system?
In a way, yes, but there are also inner feelings or urges that influence logic and all other actions, whether you call it subconscious or spirit, the inner source does play a part.  Conditioning of one's belief system cannot be limited to conditioning the sub.  But, speaking of logic, there are forces other than belief systems or subs that will influence one's logic.
Such as?
Feelings.
Where do feelings originate?
There is an inner source - the spirit or soul as it is sometimes referred to.  They are spurred by existing conflicts or harmonies in the environment.  When you feel happiness or sadness or love or any emotion, the physical effects may be the same for different individuals.  Feelings are peoples reaction to stimuli that's been categorized by society.  There are true physical responses to a lot of these conditions prompted by the thinking process.
Can you give me an illustration of how feelings are people's reaction to stimuli?
You're in a restaurant eating lunch and a rather large, sloppily dressed infant is seated in the booth behind you.  The child's mother is preoccupied ordering lunch and the child is temporarily free to jump and scream about the booth.  Your private time has been interrupted.  You feel your nerves tighten in your neck and suddenly your food 
becomes less enjoyable.  Now logically the infant should have no bearing on your happiness, should you choose to be happy and relaxed and enjoy your lunch.  But the infant does, not logically, but emotionally it has spurred frustrations and anger and other ill feelings.  People cannot always react logically because emotions are a large part of our lives.  It is ideal should we be able to control our emotions and choose when we would have them displayed - eliminate the ones we do not want and keep only those that bring us pleasure - but that's why you're where you are and I'm where I am.  There are lessons that being human are teaching you.
What are some "true physical responses" prompted by the thinking process?
A headache, stomach, hot flashes, shivers, and in most cases cancer.  Physical responses are not always illness but can also be pleasureful.  Laughter, smiling or sex is a response to the thinking process.  Our body is only an instrument of our mind and spirits.
So logic is further understood to be a perception of a thing accomplished by one's ability to do, yet effected by individual feelings and emotions.
That leaves us with step #5 - REASON.
I'll probably associate this with a Webster's definition also, rather than it's association to the process.  REASON - the explanation or justification of the process?
Before you go on James. I think you misunderstand the word reason - I am not speaking of a "conclusion" a "because" - I am speaking of your ability to reason - which is something quite apart from "a reason for."
Reason is an end result - a culmination - a satisfaction.  It is difficult to put into words - it is 'the experience' of KNOWING!
Then why wouldn't it be a conclusion?
It is NOT "because of" or 'by reason of' - it IS - that is all!
Let's just call it "what is."
Ah!  Satisfaction!

                            PATIENCE   

All of this sounds well and good but applying it requires some other obvious inputs.  The first that comes to mind is patience.  Without patience, these lessons could be canceled out by time.  Like a friend of mine said, "What could happen in the interim?"
If he's disappointed by the "waiting period" he has come to the point of not believing.  If he's disappointed with a waiting period - he probably will not begin in the first place.  To begin - he has to believe it was for his benefit - to continue - he has to believe even more!  As the grand old vintner said "We will sell no wine before its time."  Good things cannot be rushed without spoiling the 'batch.'
Why does impatience produce discontent?
It's beyond me ------
Hum...that answer should definitely explain the need for patience.
Yep!  It's like 'What is - is.'  Patience is a necessity - if you don't believe it - it takes LONGER!  Ha.  Patience may not be a virtue, but it's a very handy attribute. Patience will also be a lasting benefit - in that once you have it you don't need anymore.  
Incidentally, your only poison is impatience.  You must learn to pace yourself.  Patience is one of the last lessons to 'sink in.'  To learn it most effectively - it should be connected with something very dear to your hearts.  You still haven't done as I suggested about taking more time for your thought recording and getting things off your mind.  You have to keep chomping at the bit like a race horse and pushing yourself to the limit - there comes a time James when you must set your priorities and drop the excess baggage.  You want to do it all NOW!! and I think you take yourself for granted that you can absorb that much fragmentation.  It is not a lightly judged subject.  You cannot try too hard as I have mentioned before.  However, by expecting too much, you may be dissipating energies.  Just try and try, then wait for the results. 
Previously - your choice was all you NEED!  Now it's all you choose which is becoming your reality.  I'm sure NOT QUICKLY ENOUGH (But that deals with this area - PATIENCE)!
Do you experience expectancy?
Constantly!
Then expectancy is not a human foible?
No - not especially human - and not especially a foible -
In what area am I most impatient?
Your most obvious deficit of patience is with yourself - if it cannot be done NOW - "I must have failed."  Give yourself the consideration you give so freely to others.  I'm sure you have had frustrating moments; however, you have not yet tackled a problem that is seemingly so embedded.  (At the time of editing this book I can't remember the problem he referenced).  The 'amazing' part is that no matter how critical it seems - somehow - ironically - coincidentally - magically - it is NOT the end.  Do you see?  It still isn't the end of your rope, is it?  When will you accept James - the fact that you will NEVER go over that EDGE!?!  The only encouragement that I can pass along is; it is working.  When you have conquered this quest - - you will know the patience of which I'm always reminding you.
If I don't "chomp at the bit" I feel complacent in that I haven't tried hard enough or exerted the effort to manifest a true choice.
No one ever remarked that 'complacency is a virtue' or 'complacency, prudence and virtue are the highest goals.'  It just does not fit with the true meaning of patience.
You sure have a knack for making human foibles seem absurd.
Just so that you can 'SEE' what is 'TRULY' in your 'THOUGHTS' and I only emphasize certain areas because they seem to get out of proportion when 'MISUNDERSTOOD.'  Yes - I understand it is frustrating to have consciously made a choice and have no obvious results for a period of time that seems inordinately extended.
Isn't impatience an emotion caused by lack of performance within a consciously specified time limit?
It is our interpretation of what is an adequate time!  Patience has nothing to do with the 'length' of time involved -  After all what is time -  Patience is another subject entirely.
What happens to patience when one lives in the NOW?
It is endless - as there is not IMPATIENCE in the NOW!
How did you overcome impatience?
Analyzing my thoughts about the relative importance of time -  It's not HARD when you allow it to be SIMPLE!!  The important lesson is the patience - to allow yourself the time once you have made a choice.  It is probably one of the most difficult lessons to grasp.  You must try to exercise your patience (I never said it would be easy - just simple)!
You have said, "If one chooses to believe strongly enough, it will be."  Is there any correlation between belief and patience?
Oh yes - of course!
What?
Impatience denotes lack of belief - Whereas expectation denotes faith - belief and KNOWING!
That says it ALL!  What a totally satisfying answer...if I could just be conscious of it the next time I flip out!

                                            DOUBTS & WORRY   

I would like to reiterate a statement you made that is most meaningful - "Believe you have a choice and be aware of you doubts."  I have to be honest and admit I have my doubts but it's also my choice to rid these doubts.
That is a big step!  Admitting to you own doubts - the 'worry' then is rather like a 'safety valve' -  When you get over your head - it will 'shrilly' bring down you 'steam' level?  And when can you move one more step without chancing going "too far" - over the edge - into the unknown??  Now let's work this one over -
To what does my steam level relate?
The over-heating seems to be CHANGE - it has been secure, warm and cozy 'right where you are' for a long time and 'Why change?'  The only reason you MUST change is to  learn - to grow in your consciousness - awareness!  Do not fear change James - that is the stuff life is made of - it can be very pleasant.  Change is a good part of life - without change we would all be so bored!!  If there are changes along the way - the objective will be the same but the path may not be exactly as you have pictured.  I am aware of your present doubts.  There are many reasons for those doubts and 'wonderings' - this is all so new to you - it is no wonder you doubt.  Your questions are substantiated by your previous experience and for good reason.  That is the Known and the unknown is (or seems to be) dubious.
Where does that leave me - other than with the choice to overcome?
You doubt that you are endowed with 'plenty?'  Far from it, James, you have - all and more!  The choice is to use your knowledge and awareness to grow - in every way!  This is your quest!  Inconsistency only magnifies the doubts you have had - when you make a choice - and you REALLY want it after realizing the reasons you originally chose it and stick to it - you don't have doubts and worries - you have a clear path.
The doubts begin when you first encounter the fact that YOU choose - everything that occurs in you lifetime.  If you are unsure, it may be that you are not confident yet in your choices and may grasp the 'KNOWN' because "it is there."  This (choice) is quite a revelation in itself and very difficult for some mortals to accept.  To know our total selves takes much learning and the insight to recognize wisdom from useless data.  We all have fears of the unknown but you are becoming aware of all those things that you feared (as a child) and beginning to learn from your past experiences.
It would appear to anyone with good sense that with what we have learned I could begin to eliminate fear and worry but that isn't the case.  I view the thoughts that create worry difficult to erase from my mind.  What allows them to persist?
Worry is a MAN MADE nuisance!!  He created it through complicating his every decision - multiplying every choice - WORRY is the 'What if' 'the imagined BEAR under your bed.'  The NONSENSE of it - really!!  Worry is an interpretive word also, so let us not give it any more importance and just work toward eliminating it!  Worry is doubting your worth!  Thinking, "Perhaps I don't deserve to have all I choose.  You've got to take the BAD with the good.  The world is not bowl of cherries, Kid."   That kind of thinking (conditioning can perceive good" only with an equal amount (or more - in some cases) of "BAD."  Affirmations are indicating that you are WORTHY of the 'prize' (or end result).  Without self esteem - we cannot make affirmations.  Very destructive thinking!  It is so limiting!!  Do not do that to yourself!
The thoughts required to affect increased awareness seem to have the potential to increase doubt, as a result of the demands to obtain awareness.
Your awareness helps eliminate the doubt that you (formerly) had to battle and conquer -  Perhaps you enjoy the battles though you have said otherwise -  Nothing like a 'good bloody battle' to challenge the 'resources'-  Do you (like you daughter mentioned) work better under pressure - how about the challenge of overcoming the odds against an objective?  Have you really examined you reasons for choosing these things?  Perhaps there is some lingering doubt - perhaps a built-in excuse for when you choose to doubt.  Doubts are sometimes a camouflage for choosing not to experience - at that particular time.
I think that concept stinks!  I would prefer to believe I could choose an easy path.
The concept may stink but I think you are employing it (from time to time).  The 'easy' path is much more attuned to your choices (if you would only allow yourself to take them seriously - believe and it is yours)!
(I've got to admit that I took off on Victor, more than once, for not having the results I thought I'd chosen.  This following statements reflects some of those subtle encounters).  
Good grief!  Well, let's see now, I have affirmed, chosen and to the best of my ability and understanding, perceived.  What more can "mortal me do?"  This choosing seems to be more an ideology.
'Little ole you?  Poor Child!  Look how hard you tried and (as usual) 'it' was snatched away from you - 'it' evades you - 'it' is too hard to get or 'it' is not worth all the trouble you have had getting there - any of those sound familiar?  Perhaps your 'sympathy' is worth all the 'losses' or perhaps the attitude of later teaching "because I have suffered through all this learning myself - now I am qualified to teach others."
(To another of his answers, "Its is always as you truly CHOOSE," I retorted sarcastically regarding one of my unmanifested choices).                                      
Well, you didn't prepare us for skipping so many steps.
You aren't skipping anything the steps are -----
1. CHOICE and BELIEF
2.  REALITY
3.  CREATIVITY
4.  LOGIC
5.  REASON
What have you skipped except the 'fluff' that you interjected?  Why don't you just take some time by yourself - ride your bicycle to the beach and sit and write write write - Don't think in your 'logical' way - just let all your ideas pour forth.  Your are compounding your confusion by trying to work in the HOWS.
What about the situations I view as contradictions to my choice?
That is your perception - if you want it all to fit your logic - keep mixing in lots of extra, long past thoughts that have no bearing - you can really make some goulash out of this.
(This particular conversation dealt with the choice of a car (I thought I'd made.  I wondered why he'd suggested me getting a price bid while in the meantime any benefit of a better price had been negated by higher interest rates.  This is just a reminder of the results of confusion and unawareness).
James - you are the determining factor in acquiring the car - or any of the other affirmations.  When it was finally presented to you - you backed off - throwing in all the "why NOTS" -  Your comfort was at stake and though you can pick this out in others - you can't see it in yourself.  Once you get the car - you will feel let down that it is - after all is said and done - only a car - and no longer a beautiful dream!!
I backed off?
Yes - you couldn't get out of there (the showroom) fast enough and whether you realize it or not - you are afraid to have the affirmations manifest because it makes you vulnerable to new and greater experience.  We can scrap about this all day James but the fact remains - the car 'of your dreams' is going to remain that until you can 'face' SUCCESS!
And what suggestions do you have in order for me to face it?
Firstly you must recognize where you are - and then where you choose to be.  If what you're doing isn't what you want to do, don't do it.  Don't feel sorry and get down on yourself, that won't work for you.  What in this world do you think it would take to make you happy?  Find out what it is and go for it.  This is a hard egg to swallow James but you have had success with your choices up until now and the only limits are those that you allow - Go back to the basics, James.  You are getting too much external input to see your own truths!!  Take the time to talk only to James - you will know!!
(Within a few years of this conversation Pauline and I walked into a Mercedes Benz dealership and said, "We want a smoke gray 300SDL," and picked it up the following day.  Nine years later we still own it - it was a great choice and we have not considered buying another car.  However, at that time I continued to complain about other choices that had supposedly fizzled).
You are still that close - but you are allowing outside influences to become a cog in your machinery and it does NOT belong there.  This is becoming all bogged down with whys and hows and wherefores.  Simplify James and see your truth!!  You are only working yourself more into a deep blue funk by becoming dolorous over 'contradictions' (your opinion).  Please take time to look at the present moment objectively.  Don't DO anything!!  Just sit - and think and write each thought that enters your mind.  You will see that about 80 of each 100 are stupid, irrelevant and non-productive.  Please do not take offense to my - rather - firm words because you are only making things worse by being subjective.
(I further complained that I was probably setting myself up for another lesson in patience by becoming suddenly aware that a job I'd apportioned an allotted time was going to take much longer).
If you choose 8 weeks - 8 weeks it shall be - and you still haven't learned patience!  It is a means to an end but you are looking only at the 'end' of your nose - you have had several 'means' presented to you James - none of which seem to suit you so I'm sure you are narrowing down your field of choices to some that might be appropriate but I cannot tell you what they may be.  You have rejected every one thus far - now for a change why don't you create what ever it is that will suit you?  And meanwhile think how effective your lectures are to those youngsters who have had no exposure to this kind of gut-wrenching conversation.  
James - going round and round with me doesn't answer your question.  It must come from you and all you are accomplishing right now is filling up paper!  This is not a 'whoop of success - or plea in desperation' - this is a way of life - practice your own preachings!
(I continued to babble on that it wasn't all coming together, etc., etc.).
James - the 'problem' is your perception that you have one - have you allowed others to convince you that every one has limitations and that we all must give 'up  something?!?'  It is exactly as you expect it to be.  Now stop wallowing in despair - what have you to despair for?  You have all that you have chosen and you are enjoying your life and you are sharing with those you love - what can be so bad about enjoying the present?  If there is a delay in some 'things' - it is because you have chosen the delay.  Why can't you see that there is success in your life NOW!!  It does get better tomorrow but why yearn for that and lose today?
(I went all the way and even complained about the lacking the satisfaction I expected from teaching my awareness classes).
I can only say - that is your perception.  Have you asked yourself why?  Is this another case of "how sweet anticipation - and how bland accomplishments?"
(I continued by complaining that I couldn't focus on a priority choice because of being distracted by others that hadn't manifested).
Frankly, James - your concentration is excellent on all the wrong things.  You are thinking of failure, failure, failure, inadequacy and insecurity.  It is not focusing on what you are doing but what you have NOT done that is so distracting.  I am not making excuses James, after all, I am trying to help you - help yourself and instead you are 
wallowing in self pity and recrimination.  This can be BORING BORING BORING so let's stop with all the reverses and get it OVER WITH!!
(I continued).
Is that why my affirmations have not manifested because I believe in failure, inadequacy and insecurity?  I choose to KNOW.
James - that is typical of your reverse thinking - how about the affirmations that have manifested.  How about the peace of mind - you HAVE gained - How about... This kind of thinking can serve no purpose WHATSOEVER.  Choice and belief ARE the only requirements - you have had them both before.  When you again choose and believe you are NOT JINXED - BLACKBALLED OR WHATEVER STUPID IDEAS OCCUR -

                    YOU WILL HAVE!!!!

That is all - no point in TALKING THIS TO DEATH.  It's a matter of YES OR NO -  When you are ready we will go on - let's forget the previous TRYS.  I am beginning to YAWN at this too James - but we HAVE come this far - do you think that quitting now when YOU KNOW YOU ARE SO CLOSE - would enhance your choices and beliefs in OTHER AREAS?  I daresay this has gone on long enough and THE EFFORT IS WORTH THE PRIZE - Now again - when you are ready?
(It's embarrassing for me to tell you but I wouldn't quit and labored on with this question):
Ok, so you've guided me to the gate - why not guide me through the gate?  To fruition!
THAT IS WHAT I AM ATTEMPTING - JAMES - but you have quite unexpectedly introduced some deviations in the path to a conclusion.  Now you are questioning the very circumstances which you (seemed) TRULY to choose.  Think about it for a moment please.
(The particular choice we were discussing might as well have been a 300 foot cliff with the 200 foot rope "problem."  I was attempting to blame him for my inability to manifest a longer rope and made the comment that it made me feel defensive for having a lack of belief and faith).
May I also make a remark about the drift of the conversation?  I feel as though your are using me for a scapegoat for what you seem to see as something standing in your way - either it is or it is NOT - it is certainly not an enigma - as you seem to 'see' me - is it?  I don't understand your flare-ups at something your don't even acknowledge as being THERE.  Am I getting closer to knowing what is in your mind?
(My chastising, continued).
I must be a masochist?
Your choice!  Sometimes it's not masochism - but the result of not wanting too much 'good' all at once (theoretically so you can savor the small tastes of success) or do you value 'things' more highly if they 'come hard?' If it came easily James would you feel it was a result of growing awareness - or only a continuation of your previous "ability to 'earn' a living" (in spite of it all)?  I feel you have chosen the dramatic result and thus have 'set yourself up' for a HUGE change.  Do you see any 'logic' to that?  Your interest has not been in having so much MATERIALLY.  
Your interest has been in self development and understanding fully your 'lessons.'  As before we discussed perhaps the 'motive' has been "I was at the bottom of the barrel and I CHOSE to have and abundance - well LO AND BEHOLD - now I have an abundance so I can tell you (my students!) the solution is AS SIMPLE AS CHOOSING!"
It is something to think about -examining your TRUE THOUGHTS - once again - James - your choice).  I'm trying to open your eyes to your own destructive thought patters so you can eliminate the negatives!  Do these ideas possess your subconscious mind?  Are you trying to eliminate them or are you putting them on the list to keep it in your consciousness?
Some people use their 'problems' as a shield to repel 'change' no matter how logical it may seem, "your solutions are not suited to my problems" - that seems to be the attitude.  By admitting something would work - they lose the comfortable - familiar feeling of those problems they've fitted around themselves like a cozy lounging 
robe.  The changes are many along the way and very seldom are they 'frightening, unrewarding and unpleasant' so WHY  WORRY?!!
You MUST experience SOMETHING - would you prefer it to be boredom - apathy - blasé non-involvement??  What do you CHOOSE - taking a step FORWARD or sitting on your DUFF!  Do not fear the 'unknown' (usually it is BETTER than the 'KNOWN').  Try to move forward for you can always stop and rest - reconsider - retreat (if you choose).  The CHANGE is exhilarating - to say the very least!  (I apologize for the preceding dullness of the conversation but it is best you know the process involves personal evaluation that isn't always inspiring.  Now on to lighter subjects).

                            INDEPENDENCE    

Can psychiatry assist in the elimination of negative thoughts that produce unaware behavior patterns?
The problems persons face every day could be considered need of psychiatric help but it is your choice if you will face it and solve it - or allow it to overtake your life and beat you down - a bad business deal - a social fauxpas or a lost love.  Anything CAN set off your balance if YOU CHOOSE to allow it.
Isn't a person seeking help when he takes the time and spends the money to be counseled by a psychiatrist?
He could be - but more likely he is transferring the responsibility to another.  If he is truly seeking he may actually get some benefit from it.
I define responsibility to mean accountability for one's conduct and obligations.  It must have an equally subliminal meaning as so many people will paraphrase their responsibilities by saying. "Well, I wouldn't include that as something for which I'm responsible."  I have to admit I'm one of them or I wouldn't complain that I'm not where I want to be.
There aren't any exclusions!  When one is seeking and choosing - the means are available but one cannot 'help' another - he can only provide a means for that person to help himself.  In other words, he is only a tool to that other person.
Why is it so difficult for mortals to think of ourselves, our interest and accept the responsibility for our lives.
It has been so in-bred for so long that we feel we have to be responsible for others.  This is not so!!!  Each has a choice.  If you choose to take responsibility for others' lives, do not expect them to be responsible ALSO!  It's not easy when your 'thoughts' are so heavy and you have "wrapped so many stones around your neck."  You are the one who is struggling - don't try to save the 'rest' and take away their feelings of accomplishment when they can save themselves.  It is unnecessary and unfulfilling.
What's your definition of responsibility?
It is choosing and manifesting those choices.
By that definition wouldn't a welfare recipient be responsible?
If he has made a conscious choice he is responsible for it.
What chance would there be in having this be a true choice?
Not much - it is recognized as stealing - which one would not (generally) choose.  Incidentally, there is a difference between charity and community.
In somewhat the same vein it appears to be contradictory that one would use a guide to become responsible and self reliant.  Isn't this dependency?
There are many lessons and everyone has a different approach and a different level of difficulty in each lesson.  By learning independence you use your guides for their REAL purpose - to GUIDE.
Most of our friends who sought answers from you regarding their independence have since acted as though they've given it no subsequent thought.  Has the enchantment of your suggestions come and gone for them?
No - dear friend - not come and gone but now becoming common place.  What was before a desperate situation is now a 'bum' day - see how jaded we become - so quickly!!  John for instance, has not looked at his affirmations in months - has not bothered to go over them for changes - additions or deletions - he has not attempted to reach his guide AT ALL and has been very lax about recording dreams and thoughts.  He is getting results in direct relationship with his commitment to himself.
Would you mind if I mention this to him?
Not at all!  He is deluding himself if he won't even attempt to find his own truth and can't be bothered because "he has company - he has chores - he has a big headache."  Each excuse is taking him further from himself!
The persons you have exposed this material to are the greatest 'test' for your belief and confidence in your own choice.  It has been a struggle to overcome but you have and you will become more confident as you begin meeting persons with whom you have this belief (in yourselves) in common.  It will be interesting to finally be able to discuss this with others than only with each other.  
You are not going to change the world, James.  A lot of people have wasted their lives and energies doing that.  You are only going to change a few people's view and have some fun doing it.  Keep that in mind.  Take a lesson from people like P.T. Barnum - a laugh "sells" faster than a poke in the eye.
The book will reflect my ideas but also your interpretation of them - and each readers' choice of his interpretations.  Remember this James, for if some do not understand and attack your interpretation, you need not defend your ideas.  Just allow them their own ideas and wish them well in their choices.  If they seek - you may help them to "know" - if they do not - or even reject - it is not your loss.  It is their choice - by all means.  Let them know there is an alternative.  James, when one is seeking - it does not take long to absorb a lesson - as you well know - a twinkling of the eye and all is changed - just look forward to the time when you have a 'captive' audience.
I've already understand the hostility that will be expressed.  I'm convinced it won't recede until there is a fuller awareness of choice.
I am sure you will encounter some - but remember - it is their choice to read the book or not and while they do not agree with everything, they may find one or two words of encouragement and enlightenment.
I feel so peaceful with the lessons it's difficult to understand (except with your views on the Bible) where the conflict with the public will arise.  It's a shame more hasn't been done to expose these thoughts which lie somewhere within the psychic, philosophical, metaphysical, religious the pragmatic and a few more.
Many have attempted to explain 'what is' - but the subject is so simple - they feel they have to embellish it with explanation etc.  'Logic' does not seem to fit in this area. (Although when you 'really' understand, it is the most logical of all thoughts).
I'm concerned about giving the impression in the book that we are more gifted/aware than others and hence capable of something they are not.  I've certainly attempted to provide enough examples of my unawareness so this conclusion isn't reached.
Of course, you are unique in this world but it could have happened to others, as well.  You were seeking - they were not.
So it won't be misleading to make this representation?
To represent that you were seeking answers to some of you questions?  To represent that you have the belief in yourself and infinite intelligence to grasp an answer, when you see it?  This is not misleading, James!  This is fact!
I'm also concerned about the impression I make by my interpretation.  I'm not concerned that it represents an unacceptable viewpoint (possibly egotistic or anti-religious) - I'm only concerned it may dissuade before it inspires.
Yes - of course!  You want it to be successful but not "faddish" - intriguing but not creating dependence and provocative but not too "far out."  You will know.
Another area that concerns me is empathy.  From a casual reading the impreesion from this book could seem impersonal.  Does it reflecte a proper concern for others?
In the empathy I may seem 'short' to you but eventually you will understand my method of keeping you from becoming dependent on my empathy.  You will know as a teacher that you cannot accept responsibility for the others choice (and results) or they will NEVER enjoy TRUE CHOICES - they will always look to you for 'guidance' (or total responsibility).
Could we ask, why you as a guide, choose a specific approach to teaching?
It is best for me to do it my way - it is best for you to make your own choice.  This may also be best for you - at any rate - it's better than doing NOTHING!
These are universal thoughts and not much needs to change there.  It applies to all levels.  The only changes may be in specific areas - as time references - involvement with others and so on!  One must use the teachings to create his own expressions - not a reflection of (and comparison to) the teachers' work.
What would you say about teachings that do not extract one's own choice?
It is not teaching - it is foisting your thoughts on others - vis-a-vis - brainwashing!

                     EXERCISING THE LESSONS   

What do you suggest we do first to best apply these lessons?
First, write down in black and white everything that's going thorough your mind at the moment.  This will take some time and effort - a LOT of it!  Expect that and you won't be surprised if you spend many agonizing hours doing this.  Your true thoughts will begin to surface and you will KNOW when it hits.  Talk to me when you have put as much time in your thoughts as you have in your WORRIES!!  Experiences and thoughts seem to bombard you with details that are window-dressing so to speak.  As you record your thoughts, dreams etc, the important messages will stand out and you will know what is useful.  You have to get your thoughts out of the mish-mash of your mind and then begin programming the clear thoughts for your expectations.  It is difficult if you are letting 'problems' pervade your whole waking self. 
The answers may lie in your thought book. You need to record your thoughts and dreams every day!  Even several times a day if you are having a barrage of thoughts (and I think you are).  Get it all down where you can look at it - pick it apart and you'll probably find a very minor 'problem' that's causing all the tension.  That is a real benefit of the thought and dream book because it is surely a 'safety' valve for your 'pressure level.'  The meditation too releases much unneeded stress. 
You will discover you TRUE THOUGHTS - they may not all come as skyrockets and fireworks - some come very very gradually and just slip into your conscious thoughts without much "to-do."  Begin by listing them - then choose your end results - then proceed with the steps - it's very simple when you allow it to be!
It seems so unorthodox to accept your recommendation of spending so much time deliberating our thoughts, motives, and affirmations.
The whole point of this period is to examining your REAL thoughts, goals, affirmations.  When you have had decades to learn to "bury" them, it does take a few moments to dig them up - and as 'we' have seen - perhaps 'we' do not 'know' exactly our TRUE THOUGHTS yet.  If something is standing in your way you are allowing it to be an obstacle - that also is a TRUE THOUGHT - if you are now thinking it.
Is it natural to be so acutely aware of thoughts, feelings and emotions that the present carefree life style of fun and laughter is replaced with stoic concern?
Not `natural' but quite 'normal' if one becomes aware (as one becomes aware).  It is easy to see all the negativism, cynicism etc. in the carefree and most persons (at first) go over the 'deep end' for awhile.  It will pass (if it hasn't yet) and the laughter and enjoyment will be back - but in an even more intense form - for is it not YOUR CHOICE to be happy, enjoy and be concerned with your life - not just a happenstance that comes along occasionally between the long blue moods?
When writing our thoughts are we to concentrate on those things that detract from our awareness or attempt to discover our choices?
You will by the very idea of your growing awareness, begin to recognize those things which are not constructive to your life.  You have already become aware of some - temper tantrums, reliving old hurts, going over and over past choices (mistakes) allowing yourself discomfort because of others' opinions and so on.  These - when discovered - seem to drop away like a fog dissipating.  You don't have to know 'everything' to be aware of what is holding you back.  Writing your thoughts give you a record of your progress in development.  It gives you a barometer of the importance of each emotion, each encounter, and each CHOICE!
Where does a mortals next thought originate?  How can an original thought be conditioned negatively?
Mortals are capable of (limited only by their own choices) creative thought.  The subconscious mind (or other than Beta stages of brain activity) creates the thoughts from a 'databank' of experiences and emotions.  When one chooses to recollect the negative aspects, one receives negative output.  When you make a choice - your 'sub' goes to work on it - setting it up - planning the time - circumstances - and results.  That is the way 'choice' fits in the picture.
This gives me the feeling I'm not in control of my life if my sub sets up planning, timing and the like.
Oh but you do James!  Only not everything on the conscious level - the sub is also you - remember - and actually quite capable of taking over the whole 'ballgame' if you choose to turn it over to him.  The timing is perfect - don't try to second guess your sub - you have to know your true choices before you go jumping into things.  You seem to question areas where you have made a TRUE CHOICE because the timing is not SOON ENOUGH for you and then get discouraged that you feel you don't KNOW your TRUE CHOICES!!  They are not THAT ELUSIVE JAMES.
The question now seems to revolve around WHEN.  If you are aware of your true thoughts you can make 'deadlines' but most persons are so concerned with the timing, they lose sight of the 'end' result (and concentrate on HOW).  You will KNOW and understand your TRUE THOUGHTS and the conscious level will be the determining factor - as soon as you choose to ACKNOWLEDGE that this is your choice - as all have been.  The steps will become automatic eventually and you will be in full cooperation with your 'sub' but until you can overcome all these years of conditioning to "DO SOMETHING" - your sub will have to take the initiative to monitor the timing.
The subconscious is the determining factor of timing and approach - IN MOST CASES - however - since you are so advanced in this learning - you CAN bypass the 'waiting period' IF YOU CHOOSE!!  Time is only relative to unawareness.  The time should not be a primary consideration.  The first and foremost should be sensual - all else follows!  Some have a different concept of time - imagine Michelangelo saying - 'By August, I shall finish the Sistine job and about December I'll begin some piecework?'
That is difficult to imagine.  Does each person have a subliminal awareness to the perfect timing of his choices?
Your 'subconscious' (actually your SUPERconscious) makes the time table to jell with your TRUE thoughts - ideas - motives.  It knows far better than your 'waking' self what is appropriate - what will feel good - when to begin and end and so on.
Incidentally, time seems to be the least of your 'worries' at the moment - do you have enough time for your sensual pleasures - if you chose to enjoy any of them?  The time for relaxation?  For meditation?  Do you use your time or does it run you down?  Are you 'pressed' by time - or 'caressed??'
Good point, Victor.  During which step does the sub become involved to determine timing?
He takes over from choice - he is the monitor of your belief (thus reality - logic and reason).  When you are not off on some tangent!  Stick to the path you are on and don't stray off on the tangents that are only distractions of you true choices.
How would you characterize the conscious and subconscious level of man relative to other levels of his consciousness?
The other levels are awareness - only not total (awareness) as kindergarten is considered education - just like graduate physics.  The ones you are now concerning yourself with - sub and 'beta' (or waking) - conscious - are plenty to work with until you have reached a bit more understanding.
Is the meditative state of alpha an awareness state?
Yes - and there are many more steps (in awareness) so you won't run out of goals for awhile!
Does man have any means to control his sub other than by his acceptance of thoughts?
Well - the sub is like a computer - if you feed it the right information - it performs!  The sub does not reason - right or wrong, good, bad, etc.  Only does as it is told.  Very simple and - I might add - a good balance to your conscious (emotional) self.  It works with the Universal Mind to accomplish and end result but primarily it can function on orders from the consciousness.  The 'sub' will be very cooperative when you make a true choice - just turn it over to 'him' (her - it - JAKE or whatever).  JAKE loves a challenge.  He doesn't have much chance for 'CREATIVE' license.  But all the emotions in the world won't change its conclusions.  He doesn't have emotions as you do consciously - he is like a computer - the tears would only rust its components.
I wasn't thinking of "crying" - whimpering a bit more maybe.  I've done my share of crying without results.  Another one Jake is oblivious to is TRYING.  He doesn't understand that either.
Sounds like CRYING -
Could be we've uncovered the explanation to another riddle!  Does the sub ever allow a person to become involved in a detrimental (dangerous) situation on the path to a true choice?                                     
There is a potential of danger in most things that you do - however if the (entire) facet has not chosen 'an accident' or demise - it will keep you from 'potentially' dangerous situations.
Have we ever established if the sub manifested only true thoughts?
Now that is interesting.  The sub - being like a computer - can sort out - and reject - non-essential data.  However, when you have a TRUE THOUGHT - it is (in the origin) a conscious thought - the sub will kick it around - refine it but doesn't originate any of its own.
Does that answer compute to a yes or a no?
Yes - the computer can only work with TRUE THOUGHTS (I.E. ESSENTIAL DATA).
Does the sub question a true choice?
Your 'sub' can question things like motive - desire - timing - and the like.  Not to worry, though JAKE is not emotionally involved.
Is that why you keep saying, "careful of what you choose for surely you will get it?"
Yes.  A true thought does NOT have to be good for you!  Some persons manifest TRUE thoughts as cancer - blindness - heart failure and so on!
Oh, Oh!
That is why I remind you to look VERY carefully at your choices - because "you surely will get them."
Why won't the sub effect anything but a TRUE CHOICE?
Because he 'KNOWS' your 'TRUE CHOICES' from all the debris you implant in your consciousness.  He is like a computer - if you tell him what to do - he does it - the extra data you feed him does not alter that course.
What's the best way to become friends with JAKE to assist our understanding of timing and circumstances?
Meditation!  That is the purpose of recalling your dreams - thoughts, etc. - to program him (sub) instead of taking his schedule - (though he seems quite deliberate lately and generally KNOWS better than your conscious self).
That's interesting.  Why do you interpret what I do as cliff-hanging if it's really the sub who determines timing?
The CH's are what you program - the sub KNOWS when it's best and does not sympathize with your stressful encounters.
What do you suggest to eliminate the CH's other than acquiescing the timing to the sub?
Get your mind off it and let you JAKE work.  Relax - enjoy - and recreate your peaceful atmosphere!  Take it easy - enjoy this learning stage - and try to be patient if everything doesn't seem to fit in proper squares.
Did mortal consciousness always contain a sub?
There was a time when there was only consciousness, however, not mortal.
I meant on earth plane.  Did earth man always have a sub or did it develop as a result of developing awareness?
The 'sub' is that part of 'man' that is still a part of Universal Consciousness - the memory of all that is!  The subconscious is a level of 'life' - shall we say?  It is, however, more like the levels of the body - astral - ethereal - physical - and so on.  You could compare it to the consciousness as the astral body to the physical.  Both very necessary but one is simply a different form - has different qualities and of course the subconscious does not have the limitations of the conscious levels.  In mortal terms - it would be too overwhelming to fully unleash.
I think it's wonderful that the sub knows the perfect timing, however, this doesn't have much to do with soothing us mortals.  What can we do to enable our conscious level to know timing, what and when to do, thus creating that, "We're in the groove," feeling?              
The choice - once made makes the happening!  Don't wonder how just KNOW that it IS!!!  You will SEE!!!!!
Do you have a subconscious or is this just a mortal "convenience"?
I am all my levels of consciousness simultaneously -  It is more convenient this way  - believe me!
Then why are we designed this way if your way is more convenient?
Punishment for being mortals!  Ha Ha Ha!
So there is hell on earth after all!
Only in your mind!
Real funny - and at times I could take you seriously!!
We've discussed consciousness extensively but haven't discussed conscience.  Is it normal to have a conscience?
'Normal' - are you asking me to say 'good or bad?'  James, a conscience is all you have been taught to 'worry' over.  It can be developmental for some circumstances - the whole idea, through, is not constructive thinking and for the 'trouble' - I would say hardly worth the lesson.
Is conscience construed by you as guilt?
That seems to be the most of it.
With all the negative thoughts in today's environment how can one best go about extracting only the positive thoughts from the subconscious...if in fact we do extract them?
Be aware that thoughts are either positive or negative.  You'll have some come through but let them quickly pass, eventually a negative will be so rare you might hold one a few minutes to re-examine the feelings that previously pervaded your whole life.
Do thoughts contain energy?
Thoughts have energy but the amount or intensity of each is determined by the "thinker/thoughtee/desiree."
What kind of energy?
The same as you - physical, emotional, electrical, chemical, etc.  A thought is a portion of consciousness and contains all the attributes of consciousness.
How can thoughts of a physical, chemical and electrical nature transfix insulators such as lead?
It takes another form - another dimension from that you are accustomed to.  This is the meta-physical - the 'other' side of logical science.
So quit being so logical, huh?
Logic is not the solution - try to open your mind - become as a child - use your imagination - trust your instincts - you will learn much more than in 'public school.'
How would you define a positive thought?
One which you determine will have a benefit for you - in some cases - the "I'll think positively - IN SPITE OF ALL THE NEGATIVES" or the type of thought which eliminates the negative aspects BY CHOICE!
Is there any difference between positive thinking and awareness?
Yes - in the interpretation that most consider 'positive' as 'in spite of the odds against it' -  Awareness is KNOWING your reality is as you perceive.
What do most mortals believe to be the purpose of thought?
Most persons have no idea there is a purpose.  That is why so few people use the gift of thought and reason to any advantage at all.  They allow previous 'learned responses' to rule their thoughts and that interferes with their TRUE THOUGHTS.  
Write - Write - Write!  You must record thoughts - dreams and especially AFFIRMATIONS to realize your TRUE THOUGHTS - NO EXCUSES!  Look for the answers in your own thoughts - look for questions you have been asking yourself.
You have mentioned the practice of meditation to help assist our awareness.  How does meditation contribute to one's reality?  Can't reality be perceived without meditation?
In meditation one can KNOW his 'TRUE' thoughts.  Alpha (meditative state) is very common, not only in meditation, but also driving to work in the morning, long showers, etc.  The state of deep relaxation is what we are striving for at this time.  The state of 'alpha' is the basic end result that we are attempting to come to.  It is a physiological state of lower metabolism.  The 'meditation state' is the euphoric feeling that comes as a result of this 'physical' transformation.  Without meditating, one usually sees only the "busy-ness."  The "busyness" of living is erased - at least temporarily so you can communicate with your own consciousness and the Universal Mind.  It will allow you to see the negative, isolate it, and remove it from your thoughts!  Sometimes you need just relaxation - you do not have to "produce" all the time.  You can allow yourself some time just for 'fantasizing' and visualizing.
What is the main purpose of meditation?
The key is to expel outside interruptions and thought - rambling.  You have these ideas in your minds, however, you have to practice the steps, especially focusing on only one idea at any given time.  The main purpose of meditation is to ease your mind and spirit from the barrage of stimuli that it is constantly encountering.  The next is to contemplate the meaning of life and be aware of the importance of each life - then and only then - comes the meditation for manifestation of tangible goals, "planning" events - visualizing solutions to queries or focusing your attentiveness on the subject at hand.  It is important in keeping alive the faculties or such active meditation, but first and foremost is meditation for personal quietude and peach within.  You have access to all knowledge so use it - whenever - wherever - you so choose.
Why is the "busy-ness" of life erased during meditation?
These surface emotions are man-made and not at all natural  to the human form.  Thus - in a natural state of alpha (meditation) they fall away as dead leaves on a tree.  They cannot be retained in a natural state - as meditation or alpha.
Are you saying beta, our awake state isn't our natural state?
No - it is a man-made state of alertness, tension and fear.
Are you implying man was designed to lie prone or sit cross legged, palms cupped upwards, in a meditative state?
The 'alpha' state of relaxation need not be prone nor unaware. It is a period of focused attention at a very comfortable metabolic rate for the human body.  It is the natural state.
So the beta state would be analogous to high blood pressure?
Yes, of course - it is a period of 'stress.'
Was there a time when mans' metabolism operated only in the alpha level?
There are some who live very effectively in these levels and only chance into 'beta' in times of sudden danger or upset.  It is not so unusual.  
The more time you spend in alpha - the natural state - the more perfect will be your health - mental and physical.
Is time and space perceived the same in beta as in other states of consciousness?
Time and space are perceived differently in dream states or other levels.  I would say that time and space and sensual stimuli are unique in their effect on the beta level.
What occurs in the delta and theta levels of consciousness?
They are simply deeper levels of the 'alpha' state - still very 'aware' but not as 'active' - shall we say?  Theta is the unconscious (man's label).  In this state the body is often in trauma - and often the "consciousness" can leave the body.  It can be a regenerative time or it can be a debilitating period.
What is the difference between being in the alpha state (meditation) and being hypnotized?
In meditation you focus on what you choose.  In hypnosis - you focus on what is presented to be focused upon.
What occurs during the deeper levels of consciousness when we're unaware of conscious thought?
The deeper levels are concerned with Universal Consciousness - you may think you don't have a thought or idea or affirmation but at that time you are tuning into the most powerful of all ideas, thoughts and affirmatives.  In that state, you have access to all the ideas, thoughts, and powers to enact any and all of your affirmations.
Are these deeper level ideas and choices different from what are likely to be derived from conscious thought?  Does a person's self-worth determine choices at this level?
Yes, on both questions.  1) The 'deeper level' choices have more to do with life pattern choices than material/tangible goals.  2) The person who feels 'unworthy' does limit what he expects - not only in material goals but also in love, esteem and awareness.  The point we are progressing toward is that point when you can enter this level at will and later we will use deeper meditative states for communication, telepathy, projection, etc.  It is much different than simple fantasizing as you are presently doing.  It is belief and conviction that what you are imaging - seeing in minds pictures - is reality, as you make the entire picture of reality about you.
Is this Universal Mind's ultimate intent of mortal's application of experience?
Man has asked for eons of time "What's it all about, Alfie?"  My only comment is that the steps, theatrical though they may seem to you, are very necessary in the Process of learning "what is."  You are not yet in a capacity to judge the means - only the results.
Hummmm!!!
Try this experiment:  Sit quietly, in the state that you are in at this time.  Try to think of one and only one subject.  Do not allow busy thoughts to seep in and take you away from the productive relaxation.  You will have great difficulty because your mind races off on tangents concerned only vaguely with the idea on which you should be dwelling.  Your mind, presently is on too many concrete thoughts and the visualization seems too frivolous so you reject it.  To clarify; to go "into" alpha, you must clear your mind of all extraneous thoughts concentrating your energies on total relaxation.  When in the alpha, or deeper levels of brain activity, you may then sort out your thoughts, dreams, intuitions and ideas without the distractions of unessential data.  In alpha state, you have already cleared out the non-essential information and can then focus on one idea.  When I instructed you to record thoughts, dreams, ideas this is a simple method of clearing your mind of data which would otherwise repeat themselves in your "pondering moments" many times over with no real value of understanding.  By recording, and re-reading your notes from time to time, a pattern will emerge and give you an indication of what is really on your mind.
Throughout these lessons you have suggested we record our dreams.  I have, but they seem so abstract that it's difficult to justify the time invested.
To begin, all will seem meaningless, but out of chaos, will develop a pattern and you will understand your deeper thoughts.  The idea of recording dreams and thoughts is to get them off your mind and on paper where you can examine them.  There is a pattern - you are at least noticing a lessening of tension, are you not?
A terrific one but I have credited this as the effect of writing in my thought book rather than recording dreams.
It is a combination of the two.  The thoughts, lessening concern over problems etc., have resulted from having your dreams work out small niggling problems.  You need not concern yourself - it is improving your attitude.
That's good to hear - in spite of the confusion.
You will understand dear.  That is the purpose of 'rehearsals' - to perfect the scene!  In dreams, answers often come to you in a very exaggerated manner so that the message is clear to you.  It is not a sign of it being that much more 'crucial' than other messages - only conveying a thought.
Are we supposed to be capable of deciphering the absurdity of dreams?
Eventually you will see more meaning in your dreams - for now it is enough just to remember them clearly and record so that later when you can use your dream time more productively, it will be ingrained habit to remember and record.  Eventually the dreams will not seem "weird" - at least - no more 'weird' than the other unusual happenings in your life.  You will decipher them easily and will also use your dream states to gain answers for your day to day questions.  
Dreams and visions are most explanatory of what you are thinking, if you will just write them down and analyze them.  I will not interpret them for you for that is the purpose of introspection.  We each interpret our dreams differently - though I don't think the symbols vary all that much.  Perception is the key - of course.
Dreams often put me in a state of restlessness and concern.  Why is such a dream manifested?
When you are aware of your dreams - as you have been for the last several months, you needed feedback to understand your TRUE thoughts - but occasionally they reflect only you changing DIET!!
I'm still looking forward to the dream that makes sense.
Don't hold your breath - my son!
Did you reflect on your dreams with the same curiosity?
Of course - I think each was the key to the mystery of life!  A joke James -
Are they projected to us as a result of our consciousness or subconsciousness?
It can be either - it depends upon 'your state of mind.'
Is it an expression of belief to question one's dreams for answers to his queries?
It is an expression of your KNOWING that there is an answer to your questions and it comes from within (or contact with Universal Consciousness).
You've mentioned you communicate to us in dreams.  Why communicate the difficult way?  I probably miss 99% of the message that way?
It will be more clear to you as you learn to use your inner senses.  I also communicate these same things in our conversations but there are some things that are better "understood" than stated and thence trying to explain in your terms of time and space.
If the dream state is natural why is there such alertness, tension and fear in dreams?
It is in preparation for 'awake' living - or alternately a carryover from it.  It is like an animal - going through his daily maneuvers (alpha) then bristling when he hears a snapping branch - or 'sensing' danger (the bristling would be the beta state - more adrenaline - faster heart beat - shallower breathing, etc).
Why do people become neurotic if kept from dreaming?  It would appear "weird" dreams would have little affect on creating mental stability.
The dreams are a release from all the input one can generate in his 'little brain' - all the "ifs" and "possibilities."  If one had to experience everything which he considers it would be too demanding on the physical body - Just too much data to handle in one plane.
Do dreams contain premonitions?
Yes - dreams are often premonitions and your 'sub' sends you messages via dreams.
I've had several occasions where an incident triggered the recall of a dream...or was the dream a premonition of the incident?
It could be recalled either way but the end result is the same - it is pre-knowledge of a happening.  This is another reason for training your self to remember and record dreams.
What does a premonition most generally convey?
A choice.
Why an advance preview?
Why not?  How else will you feel assured it is a choice?
Whose choice - the dreamer?
If it concerns him - yes - if it concerns others - it may be telepathic also.
So telepathy is receiving communication of another's choice?
Yes - and if available the person/persons involved should be alerted since - in many cases - they cannot read their owns thoughts.
This is the last thing I'd expect you to say.  Isn't this akin to trying to assume another's responsibility - or trying to teach awareness to a non-seeker?
Yes - of course - it is generally futile - however, you won't get many messages about others - you will have plenty of your own to keep you hopping!
Do you perceive the meaning of my dreams differently than my conscious thoughts?
Yes - your dreams - though more symbolic, are most direct - the conscious thoughts still have a lot of variables.
That wasn't an answer to the meaning of my question but let's pursue it.  Why is this the case?  I thought the reverse would be true with the conscious conditioning the sub.
Your sub conscious can more readily accept your conscious thoughts of choice and belief.  (It sinks in there) - your consciousness still questions some of this area.
Interesting.  I've always thought the conscious had to fully believe first!
Another breakthrough!  You only have to send the 'sub' the message - enough times - and JAKE takes it from there.  When JAKE accepts it - it is.
How do I continue to hamper myself with a doubting consciousness?
You know HOW - now do you want to know WHY?
Actually, I never thought of the question before now.  Sure, let's have it!
By questioning every choice you make - you have not had much practice (until recently) in making choices and it still "seems" as though someone can take away the privilege.
Why?
Thinking - at the same instant - (of the choice) "I know it can't be - but I wish," etc.
(IF THERE WAS ANYTHING CLOSER TO THE MEAT THAN THIS LAST STATEMENT I HAVE YET TO HEAR IT.  IF YOU FEEL THIS AT THE OUTSET OF MAKING CHOICES...JUST KEEP GOING.  IT IS A LEARNED RESPONSE).
Make your dreams work for you.  In dream states all are with Infinite Mind.  You can use this mind as easily as your own.  You must listen to your dreams for they speak volumes.  Suggest before you go to sleep you will remember the significance.  This is step one --- I have told you to be still --- Listen to you own intelligence.
Yes, Victor.  I remember when we started you said, "dream in stillness."
Yes, all is within.  You are aware even when your mind seems muddled.  You have the gift of Infinite Intelligence, use it for you queries.  It will not fail you.  Take your life one step at a time.  Recall your dreams, they are solutions to your problems of day by day life.  The esoteric questions are the most simple to answer.  Each day you learn more and more.  You must also have a quiet time and place to assess the thoughts of each day.  Take the time to study your thoughts.  You must simplify your thoughts.  You will know when your are as a child not a worldly scholar.  Dream in stillness - learn while you sleep.
Please simplify, "...when you are as a child..."
As a child I wish to dispel the aura of worldliness.  Children have emotions that are not false.  There is genuine hate, love, joy, despair, etc., not facades of these same emotions.  You must first learn again the simplicity of a child then you will proceed.
That's a big order.  What's the first step?
Step one, do not expect a miracle.  You have learned your lessons one by one, now you learn these steps one by one.  As you recall thoughts, they will guide you to new awareness.  Do not dwell upon each thought but recall the experiences associated with your thoughts of each day.  This will bring you to understanding of your deeper 
thoughts.  Begin your meditations by writing in your thought book - tensions - obligations and such will then be listed and not be rolling through your mind unattended.
Why visualize on one idea during meditation?
It is the most productive time to communicate with your SUB - also U.C.  When one is determined in a certain area, concentrating on that particular subject gives it tremendous power and the more attention you give, the more power it gains so that it will be accomplished more quickly.  It builds up a reserve (as a storage battery) and when it is fully charged, then will be your "ignition" or blast-off.  The situation seems at a standstill for a certain period of time, then as if by 'magic' it is done!  You will enjoy the resultant feelings of joy - exuberance and gratitude for the 'happenings.'
I've read about various tapes we could buy with various sound tracks that induce meditation.
The tapes - I hope he listens to his own stories for he might believe that this 'sound' will induce meditation where training and true dedication could not - BAH HUMBUG!
I just saved $150.00!
Your meditation can be improved, but not by others' inducements.  It is your choice to meditate - when - how deeply - etc.  The only improvement can come from within - your own attitude toward your life and your choices.
What comes to me in meditation?  Are thoughts during meditation my truths or will they still be tainted by present prejudices, fears, etc?
You will begin to see TRUTH in your own thoughts.  Try writing down your observations after each meditation - the truth will emerge and you can have a good laugh over all the JUNK MAIL going through your post office.  We change our perception in meditation - from subjective (emotionally involved) to objective the facts (true thoughts) are seen without the accompanying 'social values' interjected.  Yes - we all have the information within (or available through Universal Consciousness) but not everyone uses the information for the same end result.
Do you have to practice meditation as one would a piano in order for the "art" to be performed correctly?
In a way - it's like a piano exercise - that one can clearly play the notes to form a melody - the difference is that meditation allows you to clearly define each note and not have to incorporate them into someone else's melody - but strictly your own interpretation of what you choose.
How do you compare the results of practicing the piano to meditating?
Both are disciplines.  The meditation (exercise) will eliminate distractions as tension - worry - pre-conceived ideas as the piano exercise will eliminate the fingers striking keys indiscriminately and making a sour note.  
Does the body and psyche undergo unrealized pressures until one discovers his personal perception of truth?
It is certainly not a natural state.  Your body (and psyche) can overcome a tremendous amount of such 'pressure' but - WHY?  It is UNNECESSARY and time wasting and UNPRODUCTIVE.
Would it be your suggestion to ignore or choose another environment should a person discover his present one to be the culprit?
In my opinion - choosing a tranquil and pleasant environment would ALWAYS be the choice.  However, there are others that choose to accomplish a tranquillity (in the end) IN SPITE of the odds against it.  It is an individual CHOICE.
The meditations help you get 'in touch' with yourself - your real thoughts, your true choices.  By affirming and then meditating you accomplish that affirmation or eliminate it through another choice.  If you listen to your self - you will know your true choices and there won't be any surprises. Now it's time to get yourself moving James - It's nice to know the answers but they don't do anyone any good unless they are USED!!!
Just pick a particular STAR and shoot for that!  There are so many wonderful 'challenges' to choose from!              
I love you!

EPILOGUE

I'm optimistic that this introduction of a different medium has put you more at ease than perhaps you were when you started.  Should you choose to continue your quest for awareness and want to contact your own guide, as a part of your learning process, I make the following suggestions.  Firstly, review the chapter -  EXERCISING THE LESSONS.   Spend some time recording your thoughts as suggested.  I would advise you to invest a couple weeks on this.  The effect of this in itself will be enlightening and the results will enable you to make a list of meaningful questions.  Your questions should stress the relevance of improvement in your life -  enjoyment, awareness, purpose, etc.  Review and study this list attempting to deduce it to some specific questions.  When this is accomplished place them in order of importance.  
You are now ready to meet your guide.  For a positive indication that you are making contact I suggest you begin as we started.  Acquire a Ouiji board and start your questioning by asking, "Is our guide with us - and what is your name?"  Continue by using your questions as a reference to the direction you choose to take the conversation. Your efforts and line of questioning will make it much easier for your guide to want to make contact with you because he knows you are serious and not using his time and effort to question his existence.  Let my past account for this part of your learning...no need for both of us to experience it.  
Should you get a prankster, who could make some disparaging remarks, pay them no more heed than you would a base mortal  - tell them to leave you alone and continue to ask for a contact with your guide...just continue to ask your developmental questions!  HAVE NO FEAR!
You may not get an immediate contact but keep trying...the pay off is too dear to pass up.  Once you have made contact, you now have enough insight on how to progress and your life will take on new and enriched meaning.  
ENJOY